Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core 7 150HL Comparison

The Intel Core 5 213PTE and Intel Core 7 150HL are both 45-watt desktop processors on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, but the benchmark data reveals a clear separation in capability and positioning. The Core 5 213PTE is the only one of the two with recorded performance measurements, while the Core 7 150HL has no benchmark scores in the database, making a direct numerical comparison impossible for most tests. The Core 5 213PTE delivers substantial multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, whereas the Core 7 150HL sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero due to missing data. The architectural differences, particularly core count and PCIe generation, define the practical use cases for each processor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors, and the Core 7 150HL has no individual benchmark scores recorded. Consequently, the Core 5 213PTE holds a nominal advantage in every measured test by default, but this is a data artifact rather than a performance verdict. The Core 5 213PTE records an average benchmark score of 32924, while the Core 7 150HL records zero. In the absence of direct comparisons, the Core 5 213PTE’s individual results can be interpreted against its nearest rivals to establish its performance class. Its average score of 32924 places it within 0.1% of the Intel Core i7-12700, which scores 32942, and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, which scores 32812. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D by 0.5% (33079) and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G by 0.5% (33089). These deltas are all within one percentage point, indicating that the Core 5 213PTE performs in the same tier as these four established processors despite its lower core count.

The Core 5 213PTE’s single-thread performance is notable. It scores 3718 in the Passmark single-thread test, 309 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 1289 in Cinebench R20 single-core, and 3070 in Cinebench R23 single-core. Its boost clock of 5.20 GHz supports these results, as the processor can reach high frequencies on lightly threaded workloads. Multi-threaded results are also strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21751, a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9135, and a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2192. The Passmark multithread score of 25590 confirms that the 8-core, 16-thread configuration handles parallel workloads effectively. Because the Core 7 150HL has no scores, the head-to-head section necessarily relies on the absence of data: the Core 5 213PTE is the only processor of the two with measurable performance, and the Core 7 150HL cannot be positioned relative to it in any benchmark.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ fundamentally in their underlying designs. The Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation with a Bartlett Lake architecture label, while the Core 7 150HL uses the Raptor Lake-PS codename with a Raptor Lake architecture. Both are built on a 10 nm process node at Intel’s foundry, so the manufacturing process is identical, but the core configurations diverge sharply. The Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads. This difference in core and thread counts is the most significant architectural gap, as the Core 7 150HL offers 6 additional cores and 4 additional threads. Both processors share the same cache hierarchy in terms of per-core allocations: 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core, with 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The total cache capacity is therefore not directly comparable without knowing the exact core topology, but the per-core values are identical.

Memory support is also shared. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Core 5 213PTE has a measured memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Core 7 150HL’s memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. ECC memory support differs: the Core 5 213PTE supports ECC, while the Core 7 150HL does not. PCIe capabilities are another point of separation. The Core 5 213PTE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Core 7 150HL provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. This gives the Core 5 213PTE a distinct advantage for high-bandwidth expansion devices, though the Core 7 150HL’s lower lane count is sufficient for more modest configurations. The integrated graphics also differ. The Core 5 213PTE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core 7 150HL uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, which is a more capable integrated GPU. The Core 5 213PTE has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the Core 7 150HL has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Core 5 213PTE therefore has a higher boost ceiling, while the Core 7 150HL has a higher base clock. Both are locked processors, with no unlocked multiplier available on either.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 213PTE wins in scenarios that demand high single-thread performance and modern PCIe connectivity. Its boost clock of 5.20 GHz is 0.20 GHz higher than the Core 7 150HL’s 5.00 GHz, and its recorded single-thread scores, such as 3718 in Passmark and 3070 in Cinebench R23, confirm strong performance in lightly threaded applications. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes supports current-generation graphics cards and NVMe storage at higher bandwidth than the Core 7 150HL’s PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes. ECC memory support makes the Core 5 213PTE suitable for reliability-focused workstation tasks where memory error correction is required. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21751, handle moderately parallel workloads without issue, and the 83rd percentile ranking places it above the majority of all CPUs in the database.

The Core 7 150HL wins on core count and integrated graphics. With 14 cores and 20 threads, it offers substantially more parallel processing capacity than the Core 5 213PTE’s 8 cores and 16 threads, which should benefit heavily threaded workloads such as rendering, encoding, and compilation. Its Iris Xe Graphics 96EU is a more powerful integrated GPU than the UHD Graphics 730 found in the Core 5 213PTE, making it better suited for systems that rely on integrated graphics for display output or light GPU-accelerated tasks. The higher base clock of 2.40 GHz provides a small advantage in sustained workloads that do not reach boost frequencies. However, the absence of benchmark data for the Core 7 150HL means these advantages are inferred from specifications rather than measured performance. The database records no wins for either processor in head-to-head tests, and both have zero wins in the winsA and winsB fields, so the specification analysis is the only basis for differentiation.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Core 5 213PTE is the better-documented and more broadly capable processor for most users, particularly those who prioritize single-thread performance, modern PCIe connectivity, and ECC memory support. Its benchmark scores place it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, and its average score of 32924 is statistically tied with the Intel Core i7-12700, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, all within 0.5% of its result. The 5.20 GHz boost clock and 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes make it a strong choice for a desktop system built around high-performance components. Its launch MSRP is $221, and it is an active product with a release date in early 2026. The Core 7 150HL, by contrast, has no recorded performance data, no average benchmark score, and a 50th percentile ranking that reflects its unknown status rather than measured capability. Its 14 cores and 20 threads suggest a theoretical advantage in multi-threaded workloads, and its Iris Xe Graphics 96EU is a superior integrated GPU, but these are specification-based conclusions. Users who need maximum core count and better integrated graphics from the specification sheet may prefer the Core 7 150HL, but the Core 5 213PTE is the only one of the two with verified performance in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock of each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and the Intel Core 7 150HL has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 7 150HL does not.

Q: Which processor has faster PCIe connectivity?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel Core 7 150HL provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU.

Q: What are the integrated graphics on each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses UHD Graphics 730, and the Intel Core 7 150HL uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core 5 213PTE?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has an average benchmark score of 32924, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core 7 150HL has an average benchmark score of 0.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 213PTE | Intel Core 7 150HL |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 14 |

| Threads | 16 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 2.10 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| Architecture | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-PS |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Core 7 (Raptor Lake-PS) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-04-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | Not recorded |

| Part Number | SA4QM | Unknown |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 83 | 50 |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 32924 | 0 |