Intel Core 5 213PTE vs Intel Core 5 223PE Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The head-to-head data is unambiguous: the Intel Core 5 223PE wins all 17 recorded benchmark comparisons. There is no single test where the Intel Core 5 213PTE takes the lead. The margin varies widely by workload, from a narrow 1.3% edge in prime number finding to a commanding 34.6% advantage in extended instructions.

For single-threaded tasks, the 223PE consistently leads by roughly 18%. Cinebench R15 single-core shows 376 versus 309, R20 single-core shows 1568 versus 1289, and R23 single-core shows 3734 versus 3070. PassMark single-thread confirms the pattern at 4219 versus 3718, an 11.9% gap. The 223PE also wins in floating-point math by 6.2% (76468 versus 71722) and integer math by 6.7% (99819 versus 93109).

Multi-threaded workloads show a similar but slightly larger advantage for the 223PE. Cinebench R23 multi-core delivers 26455 versus 21751, a 17.8% gap that repeats across R15, R20, and PassMark multithread. The 223PE also dominates in data compression (346623 versus 261083, a 24.7% lead) and data encryption (18448 versus 14413, a 21.9% lead). Extended instructions show the largest divergence: 24672 versus 16146, a 34.6% advantage for the 223PE.

The 213PTE has no recorded wins, so the use-case split is one-sided. For every category measured, the 223PE delivers higher scores. The smallest margin appears in prime number calculation (159 versus 157), where the two processors are nearly indistinguishable, indicating that this particular workload saturates differently than the others.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same silicon foundation. They carry the Bartlett Lake codename, belong to the Core 5 generation, and are fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. Each has 8 cores and 16 threads, with identical cache hierarchies: 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3.

The key architectural divergence is the base clock. The 213PTE runs at 2.10 GHz, while the 223PE runs at 2.90 GHz. Both boost to 5.20 GHz. This 0.8 GHz base clock difference explains most of the performance spread in sustained workloads, since the higher base clock allows the 223PE to maintain higher throughput before boosting kicks in.

Power envelopes also differ. The 213PTE has a 45 W TDP, while the 223PE has a 65 W TDP. This 20 W difference in thermal design power correlates with the higher base clock and the performance advantage observed. The 223PE consumes more power but delivers proportionally higher scores across the board.

Memory support is identical in type (DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel) but differs in bandwidth. The 213PTE records 76.8 GB/s, while the 223PE records 89.6 GB/s. That 12.8 GB/s bandwidth advantage likely contributes to the larger gaps seen in data-heavy workloads like compression and encryption, where memory throughput matters more than in pure compute tasks.

Both processors use Intel Socket 1700, support PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, include UHD Graphics 730 integrated graphics, and support ECC memory. Neither has an unlocked multiplier. Both launched on the same date and are listed as Active in production status. The launch MSRP for the 213PTE is $221, and for the 223PE it is $232.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear conclusion: the Intel Core 5 223PE is the superior processor in every measured dimension. Its 17-win sweep leaves no ambiguity. The 223PE's 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs versus the 213PTE's 83rd percentile further confirms the hierarchy. The average benchmark score of 40585 for the 223PE versus 32924 for the 213PTE represents a 23.2% overall advantage.

The 213PTE still functions as a capable desktop processor. Its 83rd percentile places it above most CPUs in the database, and its performance is comparable to the Intel Core i7-12700 (which scores 32942, a 0.1% difference) and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (33079, a 0.5% difference). The 213PTE sits within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H and 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G.

The 223PE, by contrast, competes at a higher tier. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core 7 253PE (40557, a 0.1% difference), the Intel Xeon 6357P (40630, a 0.1% difference), and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G (40718, a 0.3% difference). The 223PE effectively bridges into the next performance class.

For users selecting between these two, the 223PE is the clear choice unless the 45 W TDP of the 213PTE is a binding constraint. The 223PE's 65 W envelope is higher, but the performance return is substantial: roughly 18% in most compute benchmarks and over 30% in extended instruction workloads. The 213PTE makes sense only in power-limited scenarios where its lower TDP is mandatory.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE has an average benchmark score of 40585, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 32924.

Q: How large is the performance gap in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The 223PE scores 26455 versus 21751 for the 213PTE, a 17.8% advantage for the 223PE.

Q: Do both processors share the same cache configuration?

A: Yes, both have 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock?

A: The 223PE runs at 2.90 GHz base, while the 213PTE runs at 2.10 GHz. Both boost to 5.20 GHz.

Q: Is there any benchmark where the 213PTE wins?

A: No. The 223PE wins all 17 recorded head-to-head benchmark comparisons.

Q: Do these processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both support ECC memory, along with DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The 223PE's dominance is consistent, but the magnitude varies by workload type. The largest gap appears in PassMark extended instructions, where the 223PE scores 24672 versus 16146, a 34.6% lead. This test likely exercises SIMD or specialized instruction paths that benefit from the higher base clock combined with the memory bandwidth advantage.

Data compression shows a 24.7% lead (346623 versus 261083), followed by data encryption at 21.9% (18448 versus 14413). These memory-intensive workloads benefit directly from the 223PE's 89.6 GB/s bandwidth versus 76.8 GB/s for the 213PTE. The compression gap also reflects the multithread advantage, as compression scales well with sustained core throughput.

The Cinebench suite shows a uniform 17.8% gap across R15, R20, and R23, for both single-core and multi-core variants. This consistency suggests the performance difference is primarily clock-driven rather than workload-specific. The 223PE's higher base clock (2.90 GHz versus 2.10 GHz) provides a proportional uplift in both single-threaded and multi-threaded rendering tasks.

PassMark multithread shows a 17.8% gap (31124 versus 25590), matching the Cinebench pattern. Random string sorting follows at 15.9% (35798 versus 30106), while physics trails at 11.8% (2493 versus 2199). Single-thread tests show an 11.9% gap (4219 versus 3718). Integer math shows a 6.7% lead (99819 versus 93109), and floating-point math shows a 6.2% lead (76468 versus 71722).

The narrowest margin is in prime number finding: 159 versus 157, a 1.3% difference. This workload appears to be limited by factors other than clock speed or bandwidth, potentially by branch prediction or divisor throughput, where the two processors behave nearly identically.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 213PTE | Intel Core 5 223PE |

|---|---|---|

| Base Clock | 2.10 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | $232 |

| Part Number | SA4QM | SA4QF |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 83 | 87 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 32924 | 40585 |

All other specifications are identical: 8 cores, 16 threads, 10 nm process, Bartlett Lake codename, Intel Socket 1700, DDR4/DDR5 dual-channel memory, ECC support, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, UHD Graphics 730, and a locked multiplier. Both are desktop parts launched on the same date with Active production status.