Intel Core 5 211TE vs Intel Core 5 223PQE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for this comparison. The Intel Core 5 211TE has a complete benchmark profile across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and Passmark workloads, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has no recorded benchmark scores at all. This means the 211TE holds every measured performance advantage by default, not because it necessarily outperforms the 223PQE in every scenario, but because the 223PQE simply has no data recorded.

Looking at the 211TE's absolute scores provides context for what the 223PQE would need to surpass. In Cinebench R23, the 211TE scores 12201 multicore and 1722 singlecore. The R20 results show 5124 multicore and 723 singlecore, while R15 shows 1229 multicore and 173 singlecore. Passmark results include 33991 in integer math, 26150 in floating point math, 133434 in data compression, and 14838 in random string sorting. The 211TE also records 11685 in multithread, 1408 in single thread, 7231 in data encryption, 8615 in extended instructions, and 1278 in physics.

The 211TE sits at the 69th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15370. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD EPYC 7543 with an average score of 15477 (0.7% higher), the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U at 15682 (2% higher), the AMD EPYC 7702P at 15130 (1.6% lower), and the Intel Core i3-1315U at 15022 (2.3% lower). These deltas are all within a narrow 4.3 percentage point band, indicating the 211TE performs competitively with a diverse set of server, mobile, and desktop processors.

Since the 223PQE has zero recorded benchmarks and an average score of 0, the head-to-head comparison is entirely one-sided. The 223PQE's percentile ranking of 50 places it at the median in the database, but this percentile appears to be a placeholder rather than a data-driven measurement. Without scores, no delta percentages can be calculated, and no wins can be assigned to either processor.

Architecture Differences

Both processors belong to the Bartlett Lake family and share the Core 5 generation designation. Both use Intel's 10 nm process node with Intel as the foundry. Both use the Intel Socket 1700 platform and support DDR4 and DDR5 memory via a dual-channel memory bus. Both support ECC memory, and both provide PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

The core configurations differ significantly. The 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the 223PQE has 8 cores and 16 threads. This means the 223PQE achieves its 16 threads with fewer physical cores, likely through hyper-threading across all 8 cores, whereas the 211TE's 16 threads could come from a mix of performance and efficiency cores. The 211TE has a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The 223PQE runs substantially faster with a 4.00 GHz base clock and a 5.50 GHz boost clock.

Cache structures also diverge. Both processors share an 80 KB L1 cache per core. The L2 cache differs: the 211TE has 1.25 MB per core, while the 223PQE has 2 MB per core. The L3 cache totals 20 MB shared on the 211TE versus 24 MB shared on the 223PQE. The 223PQE's larger per-core L2 and larger shared L3 suggest it is designed to feed its higher clock speeds with more local data.

Thermal design power shows a stark contrast. The 211TE is rated at 45 watts, while the 223PQE is rated at 125 watts. This nearly threefold difference indicates the 223PQE is engineered for sustained high-frequency operation at the cost of significantly more power draw. The 211TE's lower TDP positions it for more thermally constrained environments.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The 211TE includes UHD Graphics 730, while the 223PQE includes UHD Graphics 770. Memory bandwidth also increases on the 223PQE: 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s on the 211TE, likely due to the higher base clock and possibly faster memory controller operation.

The die size is recorded only for the 211TE at 215 mm². No die size is listed for the 223PQE. The 211TE's release date is 2025-01-12, while the 223PQE's release date is 2026-03-08, making the 223PQE a later addition to the Bartlett Lake lineup.

Where Each One Wins

The 211TE wins in any measured benchmark category because it is the only processor with recorded data. Its 69th percentile ranking and average score of 15370 show a capable desktop processor that handles a broad range of workloads. The Passmark integer math score of 33991 and floating point math score of 26150 indicate strong general-purpose computing. Data compression at 133434 shows particularly robust performance for archive and data-heavy tasks. The 211TE's single-thread score of 1408 in Passmark and 1722 in Cinebench R23 suggest respectable everyday responsiveness.

The 223PQE's advantages are entirely speculative based on its specifications. Its higher base clock of 4.00 GHz versus 1.70 GHz and higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz versus 4.80 GHz indicate a processor that should deliver substantially stronger single-threaded performance in workloads that respond to clock speed. Its larger L2 cache per core (2 MB versus 1.25 MB) and larger L3 cache (24 MB versus 20 MB) point toward better cache-hit rates in data-intensive workloads. The higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s suggests faster data movement for memory-bound tasks.

The 223PQE's higher TDP of 125 watts versus 45 watts indicates it is designed for sustained performance without power throttling, whereas the 211TE's lower TDP suggests it may be constrained in prolonged heavy workloads. The 223PQE's UHD Graphics 770 is a higher-tier integrated GPU than the 211TE's UHD Graphics 730, which could benefit light graphics tasks.

For workloads that are heavily single-threaded, clock-speed-sensitive, or cache-dependent, the 223PQE's specifications suggest it would win based on architectural advantages. For workloads that benefit from more physical cores, the 211TE's 10 cores versus 8 cores could provide an edge in fully parallel multithreaded scenarios, though the 223PQE's higher clocks may offset this in some cases.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 211TE | Intel Core 5 223PQE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 8 |

| Threads | 16 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 1.70 GHz | 4.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 5.50 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 125 W |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | Not recorded |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2026-03-08 |

Both processors share the same socket, process node, foundry, L1 cache size, memory support type, memory bus width, ECC support, PCIe configuration, and production status of Active. Neither has an unlocked multiplier. The 211TE has part number SRQDL, while the 223PQE has part number SA4QC.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has 8 cores. Both processors have 16 threads.

Q: How do the clock speeds compare between the two?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Intel Core 5 211TE has a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: What is the thermal design power difference?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE is rated at 45 watts TDP, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE is rated at 125 watts TDP.

Q: Which processor has a larger cache?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 211TE has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has higher memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has 76.8 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has recorded benchmark scores?

A: Only the Intel Core 5 211TE has benchmark scores in the database. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has no recorded benchmark results.

The Verdict

The data presents an incomplete comparison. The Intel Core 5 211TE has a full benchmark profile showing it performs at the 69th percentile among all CPUs, with an average score of 15370 and competitive margins against server processors like the AMD EPYC 7543 and mobile processors like the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U. Its 10 cores, 16 threads, and 45 watt TDP make it a balanced desktop processor suited for workloads that benefit from multiple physical cores without extreme power draw.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE offers no measured performance data. Its specifications, however, indicate a different design philosophy: 8 cores with 16 threads running at dramatically higher clock speeds (4.00 GHz base, 5.50 GHz boost), a much larger 125 watt TDP, bigger caches, and faster memory bandwidth. These specifications suggest the 223PQE is built for maximum single-threaded throughput and sustained high-frequency operation, potentially outpacing the 211TE in clock-sensitive workloads.

The 211TE is the only processor with verified performance in the database. The 223PQE's superiority can only be inferred from its architectural specifications. Users who prioritize measured, confirmed performance should look to the 211TE, as its benchmark results are documented across multiple test suites. Users who need maximum clock speed, larger caches, and higher memory bandwidth, and who are willing to accept the higher 125 watt TDP, would find the 223PQE's specifications compelling, but no recorded data validates its real-world performance. The 223PQE's later release date of 2026-03-08 versus the 211TE's 2025-01-12 also suggests it is a more recent design, though the absence of benchmarks leaves its actual capabilities unverified.