Intel Core 5 211E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-42-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 5 211E holds a decisive advantage across every recorded benchmark in the database. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-42-100 has no benchmark entries, which means no direct comparison scores exist between the two processors. The Intel chip’s percentile ranking versus all CPUs stands at 86, while the Snapdragon sits at 50, a substantial gap that reflects the Intel part’s positioning among higher-performing desktop processors.

The Intel Core 5 211E delivers its strongest results in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23 multicore, it records 20389 points, a figure that places it well above typical mobile processors. Its Cinebench R20 multicore score reaches 8563, and the older Cinebench R15 multicore test yields 2055. Single-thread performance also favors Intel: Cinebench R23 singlecore scores 2878, R20 singlecore scores 1208, and R15 singlecore scores 289. These numbers indicate a processor capable of both sustained multi-core throughput and responsive single-threaded tasks.

The PassMark suite reinforces the Intel chip’s dominance. PassMark multithread scores 23833, while PassMark single_thread records 4006. Integer math performance reaches 88117, floating point math hits 66402, and extended instructions score 21592. Data compression completes at 346757, while data encryption scores 17938. Random string sorting finishes at 34308, and the find prime numbers test produces a score of 43. Physics testing yields 702. These results paint a consistent picture: the Intel Core 5 211E is a capable desktop chip with strong computational throughput across varied instruction patterns.

Because the Snapdragon X1P-42-100 has no recorded benchmarks or nearest rivals in the database, the head-to-head comparison is one-sided. The Intel processor’s average benchmark score of 37829 contrasts with the Snapdragon’s average of 0, a difference that stems entirely from the absence of test data for the Qualcomm part. The Intel chip’s nearest rivals, all AMD or Intel parts with average scores between 37762 and 37911, show that the Core 5 211E sits within a tight performance cluster. It trails the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 by 0.2% and the Intel Core i9-14901E by 0.2%, while leading the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 by 0.1% and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 by 0.2%. These deltas are marginal, indicating that the Core 5 211E performs on par with its closest competitors.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 211E compare to the Snapdragon X1P-42-100 in benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has 17 recorded benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multicore result of 20389 and a PassMark single_thread score of 4006. The Snapdragon X1P-42-100 has zero recorded benchmark scores in the database, so no direct comparison is possible.

Q: What is the performance percentile for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E sits at the 86th percentile versus all CPUs. The Snapdragon X1P-42-100 sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads. The Snapdragon X1P-42-100 has 8 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds of these two chips?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Snapdragon X1P-42-100 has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no recorded boost clock.

Q: What memory types do they support?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration. The Snapdragon X1P-42-100 supports LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel configuration.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Snapdragon X1P-42-100 records a memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. The Intel Core 5 211E records 76.8 GB/s.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies and manufacturing processes. The Intel Core 5 211E uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel, while the Snapdragon X1P-42-100 uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel chip’s codename is Bartlett Lake, part of the Core 5 generation, whereas the Snapdragon uses the Oryon codename within the Snapdragon X (Plus) generation.

The Intel processor has 10 cores and 16 threads, indicating hyper-threading support. The Snapdragon has 8 cores and 8 threads, meaning no simultaneous multithreading. Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The Intel chip allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Snapdragon provides 288 KB of L1 cache per core, 12 MB of L2 cache per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel die size is 257 mm², while the Snapdragon’s die size is not recorded.

Memory support diverges: Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with ECC memory enabled, while Qualcomm supports only LPDDR5X without ECC. The memory bus is dual-channel for both, but the Snapdragon’s bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s exceeds Intel’s 76.8 GB/s. PCIe connectivity also differs: Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while Qualcomm provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730 on the Intel side and Adreno X1-45 on the Snapdragon side.

The Intel part targets the desktop market segment with a TDP of 65 watts, while the Snapdragon targets mobile with a TDP of 30 watts. The Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700, the Snapdragon uses Qualcomm BGA 2073. Both processors are active in production and have locked multipliers. The Intel chip’s part number is SRQERQ65F, and the Snapdragon’s is X1P42100.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the Intel Core 5 211E for any workload requiring computational throughput. Its 86th percentile ranking versus all CPUs, combined with strong Cinebench and PassMark scores, positions it as a solid desktop processor. The Snapdragon X1P-42-100, with its 50th percentile and no recorded benchmarks, cannot be assessed for performance from the available data. The Intel chip’s 10 cores and 16 threads provide a structural advantage over the Snapdragon’s 8 cores and 8 threads for multi-threaded tasks. The Intel part also offers a higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz compared to the Snapdragon’s base clock of 3.40 GHz, though the Snapdragon’s base clock is higher than Intel’s 2.70 GHz base.

The Snapdragon does hold advantages in specific areas. Its 4 nm process node from TSMC is more advanced than Intel’s 10 nm node, which likely contributes to its lower 30-watt TDP versus Intel’s 65 watts. Memory bandwidth is nearly double: 135.2 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. The Snapdragon’s L1 cache per core is larger at 288 KB versus 80 KB, and its L2 cache per module is 12 MB versus 2 MB per core. The Intel chip counters with a larger shared L3 cache of 20 MB versus 6 MB.

For users prioritizing raw compute performance, the Intel Core 5 211E is the clear choice based on recorded data. For users prioritizing power efficiency and memory bandwidth, the Snapdragon X1P-42-100 has architectural advantages, but its lack of benchmark scores prevents a performance-based recommendation.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 211E | Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-42-100 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 10 | 8 |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.70 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | Not recorded |

| TDP | 65 watts | 30 watts |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Qualcomm BGA 2073 |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB per core | 288 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB per core | 12 MB per module |

| L3 Cache | 20 MB shared | 6 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 135.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes | Gen 4, 12 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Adreno X1-45 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2024-08-27 |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | Not recorded |

| Part Number | SRQERQ65F | X1P42100 |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 211E wins in every recorded benchmark category. Multi-threaded workloads show the largest margins: Cinebench R23 multicore at 20389, PassMark multithread at 23833, integer math at 88117, and floating point math at 66402. Single-threaded performance also favors Intel, with PassMark single_thread at 4006 and Cinebench R23 singlecore at 2878. The Intel chip’s 10 cores and 16 threads provide a clear structural edge for parallel tasks, while its 4.90 GHz boost clock supports responsive single-threaded execution. The 20 MB shared L3 cache aids in workloads with repeated data access patterns.

The Snapdragon X1P-42-100 wins in power efficiency and memory-related specifications. Its 30-watt TDP is less than half of Intel’s 65 watts, making it suited for thermally constrained environments. The 135.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, nearly double Intel’s 76.8 GB/s, benefits memory-intensive operations such as large data transfers. The 4 nm TSMC process node suggests a more modern manufacturing approach, and the larger per-core L1 cache of 288 KB may improve certain latency-sensitive tasks. However, with no benchmark scores recorded, these advantages remain theoretical rather than demonstrated.

For desktop users running compute-heavy applications, the Intel Core 5 211E is the only choice supported by measured data. For mobile or low-power scenarios where memory bandwidth matters and benchmark scores are not available, the Snapdragon X1P-42-100 offers architectural features that could prove beneficial, but the database cannot confirm actual performance.