Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

The Intel Core 5 211E and Intel Processor 300T share Intel Socket 1700, a 10 nm Intel process, DDR4 and DDR5 dual-channel memory support, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes, but their recorded profiles diverge sharply. The Core 5 211E has 10 cores, 16 threads, a base clock of 2.70, a boost clock of 4.90, a TDP of 65, and an average benchmark score of 37829. The Processor 300T has 2 cores, 4 threads, a base clock of 3.40, no listed boost clock, a TDP of 35, and an average benchmark score of 0.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The dedicated head-to-head benchmark set for this pairing has 0 entries, and the wins counters are 0 for both processors. That leaves the Core 5 211E's standalone benchmark suite as the only measured evidence in the comparison. In Cinebench R23, it scores 20389 multi-core and 2878 single-core. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 8563 multi-core and 1208 single-core. In Cinebench R15, they are 2055 multi-core and 289 single-core.

The PassMark results include multithread 23833, single-thread 4006, integer math 88117, floating point math 66402, extended instructions 21592, data compression 346757, data encryption 17938, random string sorting 34308, physics 702, and find prime numbers 43. The Processor 300T has no recorded score in any of those tests, so the Core 5 211E is the only part with measurable wins in this pairing. Its largest raw scores are data compression 346757, integer math 88117, floating point math 66402, and multithread 23833.

The average-score comparison reinforces the Core 5 211E's standing: 37829, which is 0.1 above AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (37804), 0.2 above AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 (37762), 0.2 below AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37904), and 0.2 below Intel Core i9-14901E (37911).

Architecture Differences

The Processor 300T is listed with the Raptor Lake architecture and the Raptor Lake-S codename, while the Core 5 211E has no architecture field listed but is identified by the Bartlett Lake codename and the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation label. Both parts are built on Intel's 10 nm process at Intel, and both use Intel Socket 1700. The Core 5 211E's die is 257 mm²; the Processor 300T's die is 163 mm².

Core counts differ substantially: 10 cores and 16 threads versus 2 cores and 4 threads. Cache organization also differs. L1 cache is 80 KB per core on both, but L2 cache is 2 MB per core on the Core 5 211E versus 1.25 MB per core on the Processor 300T, and L3 cache is 20 MB shared versus 6 MB shared.

Memory support is similar in type: both support DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus. The Core 5 211E lists memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s; the Processor 300T has no listed bandwidth figure. ECC memory is supported on the Core 5 211E but not on the Processor 300T. Both have PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. The integrated GPU differs: UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 211E, UHD Graphics 710 on the Processor 300T.

Clock behavior is also different: the Core 5 211E starts at 2.70 and boosts to 4.90, while the Processor 300T runs at 3.40 with no boost clock listed. TDP is 65 for the Core 5 211E and 35 for the Processor 300T.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark record gives the Core 5 211E a clean sweep in measured workloads. It holds the only single-thread scores: Cinebench R23 single 2878, Cinebench R20 single 1208, Cinebench R15 single 289, and PassMark single-thread 4006. It also holds the only multi-thread scores: Cinebench R23 multi 20389, Cinebench R20 multi 8563, Cinebench R15 multi 2055, and PassMark multithread 23833.

In math and data tests, the Core 5 211E records integer math 88117, floating point math 66402, extended instructions 21592, find prime numbers 43, data compression 346757, data encryption 17938, random string sorting 34308, and physics 702. The Processor 300T has no benchmark wins because it has no benchmark entries.

The Processor 300T's recorded advantages are structural rather than measured: lower TDP of 35 versus 65, smaller die of 163 mm² versus 257 mm², higher base clock of 3.40 versus 2.70, and earlier release date of 2024-01-07 versus 2025-01-12.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of each processor?

A: The Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads. The Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: Does the Processor 300T have any benchmark scores?

A: No. Its benchmark data is empty, its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50. The Core 5 211E has a populated benchmark suite and an 86th percentile.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Core 5 211E has a boost clock of 4.90. The Processor 300T has no boost clock listed; its base clock is 3.40.

Q: How does the Core 5 211E compare with its nearest rivals by average score?

A: Its average benchmark score of 37829 is 0.1 above AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (37804), 0.2 above AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 (37762), 0.2 below AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37904), and 0.2 below Intel Core i9-14901E (37911).

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Core 5 211E lists ECC memory support as true. The Processor 300T lists ECC memory support as false.

Q: What are the cache differences?

A: L1 cache is 80 KB per core on both. L2 cache is 2 MB per core on the Core 5 211E and 1.25 MB per core on the Processor 300T. L3 cache is 20 MB shared on the Core 5 211E and 6 MB shared on the Processor 300T.

Specification Differences

| Field | Core 5 211E | Processor 300T |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Not listed | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-S |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Cores | 10 | 2 |

| Threads | 16 | 4 |

| Base clock | 2.70 | 3.40 |

| Boost clock | 4.90 | Not listed |

| TDP | 65 | 35 |

| Die size | 257 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC memory | true | false |

| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Release date | 2025-01-12 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | $82 |

| Part number | SRQERQ65F | SRN3K |

| Percentile versus all CPUs | 86 | 50 |

| Average benchmark score | 37829 | 0 |

The Verdict

Based only on the recorded data, the Core 5 211E is the clear choice for measured compute workloads. It is the only processor in this pairing with Cinebench or PassMark results, and its 86th percentile versus all CPUs contrasts with the Processor 300T's 50th percentile. Its average benchmark score of 37829 also places it within 0.2 of AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Intel Core i9-14901E.

The Processor 300T, by contrast, has no benchmark evidence; its data consists of a lower TDP of 35, a smaller die of 163 mm², a higher base clock of 3.40, and an earlier release date. The Core 5 211E should be selected for workloads represented by multi-threaded and single-threaded benchmarks. The Processor 300T is the part whose recorded attributes suit low-TDP, small-die desktop integration.