Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225H Comparison
Intel Core 5 211E
Core Ultra 5 225H
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
The Verdict
The data splits these two processors into distinct roles. The Intel Core 5 211E is the stronger multi-threaded rendering chip in the Cinebench R23 workload, winning by 39.4% in multicore and 46.2% in singlecore. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H counters with broader wins across PassMark tests, claiming 11 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks. The 211E suits desktop workloads favoring integer math, compression, and sustained render tasks. The 225H fits mobile systems needing balanced throughput, encryption speed, and floating-point muscle. The 211E ranks in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the 225H sits at the 82nd percentile, confirming the 211E as the higher overall performer despite its lower benchmark average of 37829 versus 31508.
Architecture Differences
The two chips diverge at the silicon level. The Core 5 211E uses Intel's 10 nm process built in-house, while the Core Ultra 5 225H uses a 3 nm node from TSMC. The 211E carries the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation, whereas the 225H uses Arrow Lake-H architecture in the Core Ultra Series 2. The desktop 211E fits Intel Socket 1700 with a 65 TDP. The mobile 225H uses Intel BGA 2049 with a 28 TDP, reflecting its lower power envelope.
Cache structures differ per core. The 211E provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. The 225H offers 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3. Memory support also separates them: the 211E runs DDR4 and DDR5, the 225H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Memory bandwidth favors the 225H at 102.4 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. The 211E supports ECC memory; the 225H does not. PCIe lanes differ, with the 211E providing Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes and the 225H providing Gen 5 with 8 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well: the 211E uses UHD Graphics 730, the 225H uses Arc Graphics 130T. Both launched on the same release date and remain in active production.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H has 14 cores and 14 threads. The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads. The 211E has more threads despite fewer cores.
Q: Does the Intel Core 5 211E support ECC memory?
A: Yes, the 211E supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H does not support ECC memory.
Q: Which chip has the higher base clock?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E has a base clock of 2.70 GHz. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H has a base clock of 1.70 GHz. Both share the same boost clock of 4.90 GHz.
Q: How do the Cinebench R23 scores compare?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E scores 20389 in multicore and 2878 in singlecore. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H scores 14629.5 in multicore and 1969 in singlecore. The 211E leads by 39.4% and 46.2% respectively.
Q: Which chip has the higher average benchmark score?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E has an average benchmark score of 37829. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H has an average benchmark score of 31508.
Q: What are the nearest rivals for each chip?
A: The 211E's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 with a 0.1% delta. The 225H's nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-13500 with a 0% delta.
Specification Differences
| Field | Intel Core 5 211E | Intel Core Ultra 5 225H |
|-------|-------------------|------------------------|
| Cores | 10 | 14 |
| Threads | 16 | 14 |
| Base Clock | 2.70 GHz | 1.70 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | 4.90 GHz |
| TDP | 65 | 28 |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 2049 |
| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Arrow Lake-H |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | 18 MB (shared) |
| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
| ECC Memory | true | false |
| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |
| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Arc Graphics 130T |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |
| Launch MSRP | $221 | null |
| Part Number | SRQERQ65F | SRQAM |
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The largest wins for the Intel Core 5 211E come in Cinebench R23. In multicore, the 211E scores 20389 against 14629.5, a 39.4% advantage. In singlecore, the 211E scores 2878 against 1969, a 46.2% margin. The 211E also wins PassMark integer math by 28.6% (88117 versus 68520) and data compression by 22.3% (346757 versus 283451). A narrower victory appears in random string sorting, where the 211E leads by 1.9% (34308 versus 33654). The singlecore Cinebench R15 test goes to the 211E by 0.2% (289 versus 288.5).
The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H claims the remaining benchmarks with varying margins. Its most decisive win is PassMark find prime numbers, scoring 220 against 43, an 80.5% gap. PassMark physics shows a 62.6% advantage (1877 versus 702). Floating point math goes to the 225H by 23.3% (86540 versus 66402). Data encryption favors the 225H by 16.3% (21428 versus 17938). PassMark multithread shows a 15.2% lead (28119 versus 23833). Cinebench R20 multicore goes to the 225H by 14.7% (10041 versus 8563), and R20 singlecore also goes to the 225H by 14.7% (1417 versus 1208). Cinebench R15 multicore favors the 225H by 14.3% (2397.5 versus 2055). PassMark single thread shows a 5.9% edge for the 225H (4258 versus 4006), and extended instructions favor the 225H by 1.5% (21915 versus 21592).
Across all 17 head-to-head tests, the 225H wins 11 and the 211E wins 6. The 211E's wins are concentrated in rendering, integer math, compression, and sorting. The 225H's wins span encryption, physics, floating point, prime number computation, and both Cinebench R20 tests.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core 5 211E wins in Cinebench R23, both multicore and singlecore, making it the stronger choice for rendering workloads that scale with that benchmark. The 39.4% multicore lead and 46.2% singlecore lead indicate the 211E delivers substantially higher render throughput. Its PassMark integer math win by 28.6% points to advantages in general arithmetic and logic-heavy tasks. The 22.3% data compression win suggests faster file archiving and compression pipelines. The 1.9% random string sorting win, while small, adds a secondary data-processing edge. The 211E also carries ECC memory support, which the 225H lacks, and its 16 PCIe lanes double the 225H's 8 lanes for expansion-heavy desktop configurations.
The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H wins in Cinebench R20, both multicore and singlecore, by 14.7% each, showing a different rendering profile from the R23 results. Its 80.5% lead in find prime numbers indicates a strong advantage in integer-heavy prime computation. The 62.6% physics win suggests better performance in physics simulation workloads. The 23.3% floating point lead shows superiority in scientific and graphics math. The 16.3% encryption win points to faster data security operations. The 15.2% multithread win and 5.9% single thread win confirm broader PassMark throughput. The 225H's higher memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s supports its memory-bound workloads, and its lower 28 TDP makes it suitable for mobile platforms where power efficiency matters. The 225H also supports LPDDR5X memory, which the 211E cannot use.