Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core i9-14901TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the Intel Core 5 211E against the Intel Core i9-14901TE. Instead, the comparison relies on the recorded average benchmark scores and percentile placements. The Intel Core 5 211E holds an average benchmark score of 37829, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE shows no recorded average benchmark score (0), placing it in the 50th percentile across all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 211E sits in the 86th percentile, a substantial gap that indicates a significantly higher standing among all recorded processors.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core 5 211E provide context for its performance tier. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37804, a delta of 0.1% relative to the Core 5 211E. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 37762, a delta of 0.2%. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904, a delta of -0.2%. The Intel Core i9-14901E scores 37911, also a delta of -0.2%. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the Core 5 211E performs essentially on par with these four rivals in aggregate scoring.

For the Core 5 211E, individual benchmark results are recorded across Cinebench and PassMark suites. In Cinebench R15 multicore, it scores 2055; in single-core, 289. Cinebench R20 multicore shows 8563, single-core 1208. Cinebench R23 multicore reaches 20389, single-core 2878. PassMark results include multithread at 23833, single-thread at 4006, and singlethread at 4006 (duplicate entry). Other PassMark tests: data compression 346757, data encryption 17938, extended instructions 21592, find prime numbers 43, floating point math 66402, integer math 88117, physics 702, and random string sorting 34308.

The Intel Core i9-14901TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This absence means the head-to-head comparison cannot draw on direct test results. The data instead shows a clear asymmetry: one processor has a full benchmark profile, the other has none. The Core 5 211E's 86th percentile versus the i9-14901TE's 50th percentile indicates the Core 5 211E outperforms the i9-14901TE in overall standing, but the lack of i9-14901TE scores limits the precision of that claim.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 211E wins in every measurable benchmark category because the Intel Core i9-14901TE has no recorded scores. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Core 5 211E delivers 20389, a strong indicator of multithreaded capability. Its single-core score of 2878 in the same suite shows competent per-thread performance. PassMark multithread at 23833 and single-thread at 4006 reinforce this pattern. The Core 5 211E also excels in specific workloads: data compression at 346757, integer math at 88117, floating point math at 66402, extended instructions at 21592, and random string sorting at 34308. Encryption at 17938 and physics at 702 round out the profile.

For the Intel Core i9-14901TE, the database shows no wins because no benchmark data exists. Its 50th percentile placement is the only comparative figure, and that sits far below the Core 5 211E's 86th percentile. The i9-14901TE does have a higher boost clock (5.50 GHz versus 4.90 GHz) and more L3 cache (36 MB versus 20 MB), but without benchmark scores, these specifications cannot be translated into performance wins.

The use-case split is therefore one-sided. The Core 5 211E handles multithreaded tasks like rendering, as Cinebench R23 multicore at 20389 suggests. It manages single-threaded workloads, shown by the 2878 R23 single-core score. PassMark tests indicate strength in data-intensive operations, with compression and sorting scores in the hundreds of thousands and tens of thousands respectively. The i9-14901TE's lack of recorded data means no use case can be attributed to it from benchmarks. Its 45 TDP and 8-core, 16-thread configuration suggest a lower-power profile, but the database does not quantify its performance in any workload.

The Verdict

The data directs a clear choice toward the Intel Core 5 211E for anyone relying on recorded benchmark performance. It holds an 86th percentile rank, an average benchmark score of 37829, and a full suite of scores across Cinebench and PassMark. The Intel Core i9-14901TE holds a 50th percentile rank and an average benchmark score of 0, with no individual tests recorded. The Core 5 211E delivers 10 cores and 16 threads, a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The i9-14901TE offers 8 cores and 16 threads, a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The i9-14901TE's higher boost and larger cache do not compensate for its absence of benchmark scores in this database.

The Core 5 211E's nearest rival scores, all within 0.2% of its average, place it in a competitive tier. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Intel Core i9-14901E both score slightly higher (37904 and 37911 respectively, deltas of -0.2%), while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 score slightly lower (37804 and 37762, deltas of 0.1% and 0.2%). These margins are negligible, indicating the Core 5 211E performs on par with these processors in aggregate.

For the i9-14901TE, the 50th percentile suggests it sits at the median of all CPUs, but no scores verify its capabilities. The Core 5 211E's 86th percentile places it well above the median. From the recorded data, the Core 5 211E is the only processor with measurable performance, and it wins every category by default. The i9-14901TE's higher boost clock and larger L3 cache remain theoretical advantages without benchmark confirmation.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has an average benchmark score of 37829. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: How do the percentile rankings compare?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E ranks in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core i9-14901TE ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has recorded benchmark results?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has a full set of recorded Cinebench and PassMark scores. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has no recorded benchmark scores.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share several architectural foundations. Both use the Intel Socket 1700 and are built on a 10 nm process node by Intel. Both have a die size of 257 mm². Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. Both support ECC memory. Both provide PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Both are desktop market segments with active production status. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The Intel Core 5 211E uses the codename Bartlett Lake with a generation label of Core 5 (Bartlett Lake). The Intel Core i9-14901TE uses the codename Raptor Lake-R, with an architecture of Raptor Lake and a generation label of Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh). The i9-14901TE belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, while the Core 5 211E has no series designation.

The core counts differ: the Core 5 211E has 10 cores, the i9-14901TE has 8 cores. Both have 16 threads. The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core, and the L2 cache is identical at 2 MB per core. The L3 cache differs: 20 MB shared on the Core 5 211E versus 36 MB shared on the i9-14901TE. The integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 211E versus UHD Graphics 770 on the i9-14901TE.

The release dates differ. The Core 5 211E was released on 2025-01-12T17:00:00.000Z. The i9-14901TE was released on 2024-06-30T17:00:00.000Z. The part numbers differ: SRQERQ65F for the Core 5 211E and Q49CSRNJJ for the i9-14901TE. The Core 5 211E has a launch MSRP of $221. The i9-14901TE has no recorded launch MSRP.

Specification Differences

The base clocks differ. The Intel Core 5 211E has a base clock of 2.70 GHz. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz. The boost clocks differ as well: 4.90 GHz for the Core 5 211E and 5.50 GHz for the i9-14901TE.

The TDP differs. The Core 5 211E has a TDP of 65. The i9-14901TE has a TDP of 45.

The memory bandwidth field differs. The Core 5 211E has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The i9-14901TE has no recorded memory bandwidth.

The integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 211E versus UHD Graphics 770 on the i9-14901TE.

The release dates differ: 2025-01-12T17:00:00.000Z for the Core 5 211E and 2024-06-30T17:00:00.000Z for the i9-14901TE.

The launch MSRP differs: $221 for the Core 5 211E, none recorded for the i9-14901TE.

The part numbers differ: SRQERQ65F for the Core 5 211E and Q49CSRNJJ for the i9-14901TE.

The generation labels differ: Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) versus Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh). The codenames differ: Bartlett Lake versus Raptor Lake-R. The i9-14901TE has a series designation of Core 14th Gen, while the Core 5 211E has no series designation. The i9-14901TE has an architecture of Raptor Lake, while the Core 5 211E has no architecture field recorded.