Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core i9-14900T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data records a decisive sweep. Across all 17 recorded comparisons, the Intel Core i9-14900T posts the higher score, while the Intel Core 5 211E does not claim a single win in any workload tested. The largest gaps appear in multi-threaded and specialized compute tasks, while the narrowest margin shows up in single-threaded PassMark testing.

Starting with Cinebench, the i9-14900T leads by a consistent margin in nearly every rendering test. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the i9-14900T scores 30803 against 20389 for the Core 5 211E, a delta of -33.8% from the perspective of the Core 5. The same -33.8% delta appears in Cinebench R20 multicore (12937 versus 8563) and Cinebench R15 multicore (3104 versus 2055). The single-core Cinebench results follow the same pattern: Cinebench R23 single-core shows 4348 versus 2878, Cinebench R20 single-core shows 1826 versus 1208, and Cinebench R15 single-core shows 438 versus 289, all with a delta of -33.8% or -34%.

PassMark results paint a more varied picture. The closest contest is PassMark single-thread, where the i9-14900T scores 4016 and the Core 5 211E scores 4006, a delta of only -0.2%. This near-tie indicates that in lightly threaded, single-core workloads, the two processors are effectively equivalent. The same -0.2% delta appears for the duplicate PassMark singlethread recording.

The widest gap in the entire dataset appears in PassMark find prime numbers. The i9-14900T scores 164, while the Core 5 211E scores 43, a delta of -73.8%. This workload, which is heavily dependent on integer throughput and core count, strongly favors the higher-core-count processor. PassMark physics shows a similarly large gap: 2245 versus 702, a delta of -68.7%. Data encryption also separates the two clearly, with the i9-14900T scoring 27062 versus 17938, a delta of -33.7%.

The remaining PassMark tests show moderate to large advantages for the i9-14900T. Integer math shows 138149 versus 88117, a delta of -36.2%. Multithreaded performance shows 36239 versus 23833, a delta of -34.2%. Floating point math shows 92699 versus 66402, a delta of -28.4%. Random string sorting shows 49484 versus 34308, a delta of -30.7%. Data compression shows 436066 versus 346757, a delta of -20.5%. The smallest non-single-thread gap is in extended instructions, where the i9-14900T scores 23660 versus 21592, a delta of -8.7%.

Where Each One Wins

The i9-14900T wins every recorded benchmark, so in terms of raw measured performance, there is no workload category where the Core 5 211E comes out ahead. That said, the magnitude of the advantage varies significantly by workload type, which clarifies where each processor is more or less competitive.

The Core 5 211E is closest to the i9-14900T in single-threaded PassMark testing, with a delta of -0.2%. This suggests that for basic single-threaded desktop responsiveness, the two processors are nearly indistinguishable. The Core 5 211E also comes within -8.7% in PassMark extended instructions, a workload that benefits from modern instruction set support rather than raw core count. These two results represent the only areas where the Core 5 211E stays within single-digit percentage points of its rival.

The i9-14900T dominates in heavily parallel workloads. The -73.8% delta in find prime numbers, the -68.7% delta in physics, and the -36.2% delta in integer math all point to a processor that scales far better with thread count. The Cinebench multicore results, all near -33.8%, reinforce this: the i9-14900T delivers roughly a third more rendering throughput in every Cinebench version tested.

For users focused on data compression, the i9-14900T leads by a smaller but still substantial margin of -20.5%. The extended instructions workload, at -8.7%, is the only other test where the gap falls below 20%. The overall pattern is clear: the i9-14900T wins everywhere, but its advantage is largest in multi-threaded compute, integer-heavy math, and physics simulation, while its advantage is smallest in single-threaded and extended instruction workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel design families. The Core 5 211E uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation. The i9-14900T uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename, within the Core 14th Gen series, and belongs to the Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation.

Both processors are built on the same 10 nm process node and are fabricated by Intel. Both use a die size of 257 mm². The socket is identical for both: Intel Socket 1700. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking headroom is restricted on both parts.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The Core 5 211E provides 10 cores and 16 threads. The i9-14900T provides 24 cores and 32 threads. This difference, 14 additional cores and 16 additional threads for the i9-14900T, explains the large multicore performance gap in the benchmark data.

Cache configuration also differs. Both processors list 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core. The shared L3 cache, however, is 20 MB on the Core 5 211E and 36 MB on the i9-14900T. The i9-14900T therefore carries 16 MB more shared L3 cache, which supports its larger core count and helps with data-heavy workloads.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 5 211E uses UHD Graphics 730, while the i9-14900T uses UHD Graphics 770. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus. The Core 5 211E lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the i9-14900T does not have a recorded memory bandwidth figure in the database. Both support ECC memory. Both use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Specification Differences

The specification sheet shows several clear differences between the two processors, all recorded in the database.

The Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads. The i9-14900T has 24 cores and 32 threads. Base clock speeds differ: the Core 5 211E runs at 2.70 GHz, while the i9-14900T runs at 1.10 GHz. Boost clocks reverse the ordering: the Core 5 211E boosts to 4.90 GHz, while the i9-14900T boosts to 5.50 GHz. The i9-14900T therefore has a higher maximum clock despite a much lower base clock.

Thermal design power differs significantly. The Core 5 211E has a TDP of 65 watts. The i9-14900T has a TDP of 35 watts. This makes the i9-14900T the lower-power part on paper, despite its higher core count and higher boost clock.

Shared L3 cache differs: 20 MB for the Core 5 211E versus 36 MB for the i9-14900T. The memory bandwidth field shows 76.8 GB/s for the Core 5 211E, while the i9-14900T has no recorded value. Integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics 730 for the Core 5 211E versus UHD Graphics 770 for the i9-14900T. The release dates differ: the Core 5 211E launched on 2025-01-12, while the i9-14900T launched on 2024-01-07. The part numbers are SRQERQ65F for the Core 5 211E and SRN3U for the i9-14900T. The launch MSRP is $221 for the Core 5 211E and $549 for the i9-14900T.

Fields that are the same include the process node (10 nm), foundry (Intel), die size (257 mm²), L1 cache per core (80 KB), L2 cache per core (2 MB), socket (Intel Socket 1700), memory support (DDR4, DDR5), memory bus (dual-channel), ECC support (true), PCIe version and lane count (Gen 5, 16 lanes CPU only), market segment (Desktop), production status (Active), and multiplier unlock status (false).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900T has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How large is the performance gap in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The i9-14900T scores 30803 in Cinebench R23 multicore, while the Core 5 211E scores 20389, a delta of -33.8% for the Core 5.

Q: Is there any benchmark where the Core 5 211E is close to the i9-14900T?

A: Yes. In PassMark single-thread, the Core 5 211E scores 4006 versus 4016 for the i9-14900T, a delta of only -0.2%. In PassMark extended instructions, the Core 5 scores 21592 versus 23660, a delta of -8.7%.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest gap is in PassMark find prime numbers, where the i9-14900T scores 164 and the Core 5 211E scores 43, a delta of -73.8%. PassMark physics is close behind at -68.7%.

Q: Do the two processors use the same socket?

A: Yes, both use Intel Socket 1700. They also share the same 10 nm process node and a die size of 257 mm².

Q: Which processor has the lower TDP?

A: The i9-14900T has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Core 5 211E has a TDP of 65 watts.

The Verdict

The recorded data is unambiguous. The Intel Core i9-14900T wins all 17 head-to-head benchmarks against the Intel Core 5 211E. The average benchmark score for the i9-14900T is 51015, compared to 37829 for the Core 5 211E. The i9-14900T sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs in the database, while the Core 5 211E sits at the 86th percentile.

The i9-14900T delivers its largest advantages in multi-threaded and specialized workloads. The -73.8% delta in find prime numbers, the -68.7% delta in physics, and the -36.2% delta in integer math all indicate that the 24-core, 32-thread configuration is the right choice for heavily parallel compute tasks. The Cinebench multicore results, consistently around -33.8%, confirm this pattern across multiple rendering versions. Data encryption, multithreaded PassMark, and random string sorting all show deltas between -30.7% and -34.2%, reinforcing the multi-threaded advantage.

The Core 5 211E is not without competitive pockets. The -0.2% delta in PassMark single-thread means the two processors are effectively tied for single-threaded desktop tasks. The -8.7% delta in extended instructions shows that the Core 5 211E handles instruction-heavy workloads reasonably well. These two results are the only areas where the Core 5 211E stays within single-digit percentage points.

For buyers who prioritize maximum multi-threaded throughput, rendering performance, and physics compute, the i9-14900T is the processor the data supports. Its higher core count, larger 36 MB L3 cache, and higher 5.50 GHz boost clock all align with the benchmark outcomes. Its lower 35 watt TDP also makes it an efficient choice on paper, despite its higher launch MSRP of $549.

For buyers who need only basic single-threaded performance and want to spend less, the Core 5 211E offers near-identical single-thread PassMark scores at a launch MSRP of $221. The data shows that in single-threaded tasks, the Core 5 211E falls behind by only 0.2%. However, for any workload that scales across cores, the i9-14900T is the clear winner, with advantages ranging from -8.7% to -73.8% across the rest of the benchmark suite.