Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core i7-13700 Comparison
Intel Core 5 211E
Core i7-13700
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core i7-13700
FAQ
Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E records an average benchmark score of 37,829, while the Intel Core i7-13700 posts 37,135. The Core 5 211E sits 0.2% ahead of the i7-13700 in this aggregate metric.
Q: How do the two chips rank among all CPUs?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E lands in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core i7-13700 sits in the 85th percentile. The Core 5 211E's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (0.2% slower) and Intel Core i9-14901E (0.2% faster), while the i7-13700's closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 7 160, with a 0% delta.
Q: In which benchmark does the Core 5 211E achieve its biggest single-core victory?
A: The Core 5 211E beats the i7-13700 by 43.3% in Cinebench R23 single-core, scoring 2,878 versus 2,008.5. It also wins Cinebench R15 single-core by 1.4% (289 vs. 285).
Q: What is the largest multi-core performance gap between the two?
A: The i7-13700 leads by 70.7% in PassMark find prime numbers (147 vs. 43), and by 65.8% in PassMark physics (2,053 vs. 702). In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i7-13700 posts 3,692 against 2,055, a 44.3% advantage.
Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?
A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. However, the Core 5 211E lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the i7-13700's memory bandwidth field is not recorded in the database.
Q: How many benchmark wins does each processor claim in the head-to-head comparison?
A: The Intel Core i7-13700 wins 15 of the 17 head-to-head benchmarks. The Intel Core 5 211E wins 2: Cinebench R15 single-core and Cinebench R23 single-core.
The Verdict
The data points to two distinct use cases. The Intel Core 5 211E is the pick for single-threaded workloads that prioritize per-core responsiveness, as evidenced by its 43.3% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core and its 1.4% edge in Cinebench R15 single-core. Its 86th percentile ranking and 37,829 average score, slightly ahead of the i7-13700's 37,135, reinforce that it is no slouch in general productivity.
The Intel Core i7-13700, however, is the dominant choice for heavily multithreaded tasks. It wins 15 of 17 head-to-head matchups, with multi-core deltas ranging from 19.6% to 70.7% across Cinebench and PassMark tests. The i7-13700's 16 cores and 24 threads against the Core 5 211E's 10 cores and 16 threads translate directly into large advantages in rendering, physics simulation, and integer math. Its 85th percentile ranking is nearly identical to the Core 5 211E's 86th, but the shape of its performance is heavily weighted toward parallel throughput.
For users running software that scales across many threads, the i7-13700 is the clear winner. For those whose primary workloads are lightly threaded or latency-sensitive, the Core 5 211E offers comparable aggregate performance with a notable single-core boost. The i7-13700 also carries a higher launch MSRP of $384, versus $221 for the Core 5 211E, though both are locked multipliers and target the desktop socket 1700 platform.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The i7-13700's multi-core dominance is consistent across every Cinebench multi-threaded test. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 3,692 versus 2,055, a 44.3% lead. Cinebench R20 multi-core shows 12,806 against 8,563, a 33.1% gap. Cinebench R23 multi-core narrows the difference to 19.6%, with 25,369 for the i7-13700 and 20,389 for the Core 5 211E. The pattern holds in PassMark: multithread scores 36,387 against 23,833, a 34.5% delta, and integer math posts 138,974 versus 88,117, a 36.6% lead.
The i7-13700's strongest wins come in specialized math and physics workloads. PassMark find prime numbers shows a 70.7% advantage (147 vs. 43), and PassMark physics delivers a 65.8% lead (2,053 vs. 702). Floating-point math also favors the i7-13700 by 32.1% (97,723 vs. 66,402). Data compression and encryption follow suit: 443,900 versus 346,757 (21.9% delta) and 25,653 versus 17,938 (30.1% delta), respectively.
The Core 5 211E's two victories are notable for their magnitude. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 2,878 against the i7-13700's 2,008.5, a 43.3% margin. Cinebench R15 single-core is closer: 289 versus 285, a 1.4% edge. In PassMark single-thread, the i7-13700 narrowly wins 4,101 versus 4,006, a 2.3% difference. The Core 5 211E also loses extended instructions by 18.8% (21,592 vs. 26,578) and random string sorting by 26.1% (34,308 vs. 46,418).
Aggregate scores tell a nuanced story. The Core 5 211E's 37,829 average edges the i7-13700's 37,135, but the i7-13700's nearest rivals cluster tightly around 37,112 to 37,161, while the Core 5 211E's rivals range from 37,762 to 37,911. This suggests the Core 5 211E's aggregate strength comes from its exceptional single-core result, while the i7-13700's many multi-core wins are offset by its weaker single-core showing.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ most sharply in core and thread counts. The Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the i7-13700 has 16 cores and 24 threads. Base clocks differ: 2.70 GHz for the Core 5 211E versus 2.10 GHz for the i7-13700. Boost clocks also differ, with the i7-13700 reaching 5.20 GHz against the Core 5 211E's 4.90 GHz.
Both are 65W TDP parts and use Intel Socket 1700. The Core 5 211E comes from the Bartlett Lake codename, while the i7-13700 is from Raptor Lake-S, with its architecture listed as Raptor Lake. Both use a 10 nm process node and a 257 mm² die size. L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core, and L2 is 2 MB per core for both. L3 cache differs: the Core 5 211E has 20 MB shared, while the i7-13700 has 30 MB shared.
Integrated graphics differ: the Core 5 211E carries UHD Graphics 730, while the i7-13700 has UHD Graphics 770. Memory bandwidth is recorded only for the Core 5 211E at 76.8 GB/s. Both support DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel memory, ECC, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Release dates are 2025-01-12 for the Core 5 211E and 2023-01-03 for the i7-13700. Launch MSRP values are $221 and $384, respectively. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.
Architecture Differences
The Core 5 211E is built on the Bartlett Lake architecture, while the i7-13700 uses Raptor Lake. Both are fabricated by Intel on a 10 nm process, and both have a die size of 257 mm². The fundamental architectural divergence lies in core organization: the Core 5 211E offers 10 cores and 16 threads, whereas the i7-13700 provides 16 cores and 24 threads. This difference explains the i7-13700's consistent multi-core advantage across Cinebench and PassMark workloads.
The i7-13700's larger 30 MB shared L3 cache versus the Core 5 211E's 20 MB shared L3 cache likely contributes to its stronger performance in data-heavy tasks like compression (443,900 vs. 346,757) and encryption (25,653 vs. 17,938). The Core 5 211E's higher base clock of 2.70 GHz versus the i7-13700's 2.10 GHz, combined with its newer Bartlett Lake design, helps explain the 43.3% single-core Cinebench R23 victory.
Both processors integrate graphics, but the i7-13700's UHD Graphics 770 is a higher-tier part than the Core 5 211E's UHD Graphics 730. Both support ECC memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The i7-13700's earlier release date of 2023-01-03 and its Raptor Lake lineage position it as a mature design, while the Core 5 211E's 2025-01-12 release date and Bartlett Lake codename suggest a newer implementation. The 65W TDP is identical for both, and neither has an unlocked multiplier, indicating both are intended for fixed-clock operation in desktop systems.