Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison
Intel Core 5 211E
Core i5-14501TE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core i5-14501TE
FAQ
Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core 5 211E and the Intel Core i5-14501TE?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.
Q: How do the two processors compare in terms of clock speeds?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has a lower base clock of 2.20 GHz but a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz.
Q: What are the thermal design power (TDP) ratings for these chips?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has a TDP of 45 watts.
Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?
A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 211E has 20 MB of shared L3 cache.
Q: What integrated graphics do these processors include?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E uses UHD Graphics 730. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses UHD Graphics 770.
Q: What is the release date difference between the two?
A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE was released on June 30, 2024. The Intel Core 5 211E followed on January 12, 2025.
Architecture Differences
The two processors share the same Intel Socket 1700, a 10 nm process node from Intel, and dual-channel memory support for DDR4 and DDR5. Both also support ECC memory and provide PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The architectural split appears in the core design and cache hierarchy.
The Intel Core 5 211E uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation. Its die size is 257 mm². It uses 10 cores with 16 threads, and each core has 80 KB of L1 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache. The shared L3 cache totals 20 MB.
The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake-R codename and is part of the Core 14th Gen series with Raptor Lake architecture. Its die size is 215 mm². It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with the same 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache per core is smaller at 1.25 MB, but the shared L3 cache is larger at 24 MB.
The core count difference is significant, with the 211E offering 4 more cores and 4 more threads. The L2 cache allocation also differs, with the 211E giving each core 2 MB versus 1.25 MB on the 14501TE. However, the 14501TE compensates with a larger L3 pool and a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 4.90 GHz on the 211E.
The base clocks differ as well, with the 211E running at 2.70 GHz and the 14501TE at 2.20 GHz. The TDP ratings reflect this, with the 211E rated at 65 watts and the 14501TE at 45 watts. Both chips have locked multipliers, meaning they do not support manual overclocking.
The integrated graphics differ, with the 211E using UHD Graphics 730 and the 14501TE using UHD Graphics 770. The launch MSRP for the 211E was $221. The 14501TE has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Core 5 211E and the Intel Core i5-14501TE. The 211E has a full set of recorded benchmark scores, while the 14501TE has no benchmark entries in the database.
The Intel Core 5 211E scores 2055 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 289 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 8563 multi-core and 1208 single-core. The Cinebench R23 results are 20389 multi-core and 2878 single-core.
PassMark results for the 211E include data compression at 346757, data encryption at 17938, extended instructions at 21592, and find prime numbers at 43. Floating point math scores 66402, integer math scores 88117, and multi-thread performance scores 23833. Physics scores 702, random string sorting scores 34308, and single-thread scores 4006.
The 211E has an average benchmark score of 37829, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37804, a delta of 0.1 percent. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 37762, a delta of 0.2 percent. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904, a delta of -0.2 percent. The Intel Core i9-14901E scores 37911, also a delta of -0.2 percent.
These deltas show the 211E sits in a very competitive band where less than 0.3 percent separates it from four different rival processors. The performance profile is essentially tied with these alternatives, with the 211E slightly ahead of two and slightly behind two.
The 14501TE has no benchmark scores recorded, so its average benchmark score is zero and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50. This means no direct performance comparison can be made from the database. The win counts for both processors are zero in the head-to-head category.
Specification Differences
The specification table below isolates only the fields where the two processors differ:
| Specification | Intel Core 5 211E | Intel Core i5-14501TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base Clock | 2.70 GHz | 2.20 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | 5.10 GHz |
| TDP | 65 W | 45 W |
| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-R |
| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |
| Die Size | 257 mm² | 215 mm² |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |
| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2024-06-30 |
| Launch MSRP | $221 | Not recorded |
| Part Number | SRQERQ65F | Q49KSRNJN |
The fields that are identical include the socket (Intel Socket 1700), process node (10 nm), foundry (Intel), L1 cache (80 KB per core), memory support (DDR4, DDR5), memory bus (Dual-channel), ECC support (true), PCIe configuration (Gen 5, 16 Lanes CPU only), market segment (Desktop), production status (Active), and multiplier unlocked (false).
The 211E offers more cores, threads, a higher base clock, larger per-core L2 cache, and a larger die. The 14501TE offers a higher boost clock, lower TDP, larger L3 cache, and a smaller die.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core 5 211E holds the advantage in multi-core-oriented workloads. Its 10 cores and 16 threads provide more parallel execution capacity than the 6-core, 12-thread configuration of the 14501TE. The 211E also has a higher base clock of 2.70 GHz versus 2.20 GHz, which helps in sustained workloads that do not reach boost frequencies. The larger L2 cache per core at 2 MB versus 1.25 MB also favors the 211E for workloads with high per-core data locality.
The 211E's recorded benchmark scores confirm strong multi-core performance. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20389 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 23833 indicate solid throughput for heavily threaded applications. Its percentile ranking of 86 places it above the vast majority of CPUs in the database. The 211E also carries a higher TDP of 65 watts, which allows it to sustain higher power draw for longer periods under load.
The Intel Core i5-14501TE wins in single-thread peak performance due to its higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz. For lightly threaded tasks that depend on maximum clock speed, the 14501TE has a clear specification advantage. The larger 24 MB L3 cache also benefits workloads with large shared data sets that need frequent access across cores.
The 14501TE's lower TDP of 45 watts makes it the more power-efficient option on paper. Systems with tighter thermal envelopes or smaller cooling solutions would favor this chip. The smaller die size of 215 mm² versus 257 mm² also indicates a more compact silicon footprint.
The integrated graphics differ, with the 14501TE using UHD Graphics 770 and the 211E using UHD Graphics 730. For systems relying on the integrated GPU without a discrete card, the 770 designation suggests a higher-tier graphics solution.
The database shows no recorded benchmarks for the 14501TE, so its practical performance cannot be quantified here. The 211E has extensive benchmark coverage and an average score of 37829, placing it in the 86th percentile. The nearest rival data confirms the 211E performs within 0.2 percent of several high-end processors, including the Intel Core i9-14901E.
For multi-threaded productivity, rendering, compilation, and data processing, the 211E has the core count and the recorded scores to back its position. For single-thread burst workloads, maximum clock speed, and lower power draw, the 14501TE has the specification advantage despite lacking benchmark data. The choice between them depends on whether the workload favors parallel throughput or peak single-core frequency.