Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core i5-14500T Comparison
Intel Core 5 211E
Core i5-14500T
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core i5-14500T
The Verdict
The recorded data splits these two Intel Socket 1700 processors along clear lines. The Intel Core 5 211E wins 15 of the 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, while the Intel Core i5-14500T wins only 2. The average benchmark score reinforces this: the Core 5 211E sits at 37829, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, whereas the Core i5-14500T averages 28065 and lands in the 80th percentile. For users prioritizing raw multi-threaded throughput, sustained rendering, and single-core responsiveness, the Core 5 211E is the data-backed choice. The Core i5-14500T, however, holds two specific victories that hint at a different workload profile, particularly in physics calculations and prime number generation. The Core 5 211E is not universally faster; it simply wins in more general-purpose categories. The Core i5-14500T remains competitive in niche tasks where its architecture favors certain instruction patterns.
Where Each One Wins
The Core 5 211E dominates the Cinebench suite. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 20389 against 11790 for the Core i5-14500T, a 72.9% advantage. Single-core R23 shows a 56.6% lead (2878 versus 1838). These are not marginal gaps; they indicate a substantial performance tier difference in both lightly threaded and heavily threaded workloads. The PassMark suite also favors the Core 5 211E in data compression (346757 versus 262417, 32.1% ahead), extended instructions (21592 versus 16043, 34.6% ahead), and random string sorting (34308 versus 28462, 20.5% ahead). Integer math and floating-point math also go to the Core 5 211E by 8.9% and 12.8%, respectively.
The Core i5-14500T wins in exactly two tests. PassMark find prime numbers shows 81 for the Core i5-14500T against 43 for the Core 5 211E, a 46.9% reversal. PassMark physics shows 1288 versus 702, a 45.5% lead for the Core i5-14500T. These wins suggest that in specific computational patterns, particularly those involving prime sieving and physics simulation, the Core i5-14500T's core configuration extracts more work. The data does not explain why, but the consistency across both wins points to an architectural quirk rather than measurement noise.
Architecture Differences
Both processors use Intel's 10 nm process node and share the Intel Socket 1700, dual-channel memory, DDR4 and DDR5 support, ECC memory capability, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The differences begin with core counts. The Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the Core 5 211E posts higher multi-threaded scores in Cinebench, which indicates its cores are individually stronger or clocked more aggressively.
Clock speeds differ notably. The Core 5 211E has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Core i5-14500T has a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Core 5 211E's higher base clock likely contributes to its single-core lead, while the similar boost clocks keep the gap smaller in single-thread tests. Thermal design power also diverges: the Core 5 211E is rated at 65 W, the Core i5-14500T at 35 W. This means the Core i5-14500T draws less power at base, but the benchmark data shows it cannot match the Core 5 211E's output.
Cache hierarchies differ. Both have 80 KB L1 per core. The Core 5 211E has 2 MB L2 per core and 20 MB shared L3. The Core i5-14500T has 1.25 MB L2 per core and 24 MB shared L3. The Core 5 211E has more L2 per core, while the Core i5-14500T has more total L3. Die size also differs: 257 mm² for the Core 5 211E versus 215 mm² for the Core i5-14500T. The Core 5 211E carries the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Core i5-14500T belongs to Raptor Lake-R. Integrated graphics differ as well: UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 211E, UHD Graphics 770 on the Core i5-14500T.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E records an average benchmark score of 37829, compared to 28065 for the Intel Core i5-14500T. This places the Core 5 211E in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core i5-14500T sits in the 80th percentile.
Q: How many benchmark wins does each processor hold?
A: The Core 5 211E wins 15 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons. The Core i5-14500T wins 2, specifically in PassMark find prime numbers and PassMark physics.
Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?
A: The largest gap is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Core 5 211E scores 20389 versus 11790, a 72.9% advantage. The second largest is in Cinebench R23 single-core at 56.6%.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: Yes, both the Intel Core 5 211E and the Intel Core i5-14500T support ECC memory, and both use dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory.
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads. Despite this, the Core 5 211E achieves higher multi-threaded benchmark scores.
Q: What is the difference in thermal design power?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E is rated at 65 W, while the Intel Core i5-14500T is rated at 35 W. The Core i5-14500T has a lower power envelope, but the Core 5 211E delivers higher performance in most recorded tests.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The Cinebench R23 multi-core test delivers the most decisive result. The Core 5 211E scores 20389, the Core i5-14500T scores 11790, a 72.9% delta. This is not a close contest; it suggests the Core 5 211E handles sustained multi-core loads far better. Cinebench R23 single-core follows a similar pattern: 2878 versus 1838, a 56.6% lead. The single-core gap is smaller in absolute terms but still substantial.
Cinebench R15 and R20 show narrower margins. In R15 multi-core, the Core 5 211E leads 2055 to 2022, just 1.6%. R15 single-core shows a 14.7% lead (289 versus 252). R20 multi-core gives the Core 5 211E a 4.7% edge (8563 versus 8177), and R20 single-core matches that 4.7% delta (1208 versus 1154). The older Cinebench versions tell a tighter story, while the newer R23 reveals a larger architectural advantage.
PassMark tests split into two camps. The Core 5 211E wins data compression by 32.1% (346757 versus 262417), extended instructions by 34.6% (21592 versus 16043), random string sorting by 20.5% (34308 versus 28462), floating-point math by 12.8% (66402 versus 58869), and integer math by 8.9% (88117 versus 80922). Data encryption goes to the Core 5 211E by 16.4% (17938 versus 15410). Multi-threaded PassMark shows a smaller 4% lead (23833 versus 22910), and single-thread PassMark shows 7.2% (4006 versus 3736).
The Core i5-14500T's two wins are notable for their magnitude. PassMark find prime numbers: 81 versus 43, a 46.9% advantage. PassMark physics: 1288 versus 702, a 45.5% advantage. These are the only tests where the Core i5-14500T exceeds the Core 5 211E by a wide margin. The data indicates that prime number generation and physics simulation workloads favor the Core i5-14500T's core layout, even though it loses decisively elsewhere.
Specification Differences
The two processors share several specifications: both are Intel parts on the 10 nm node, use Intel Socket 1700, support DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, have ECC memory support, use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, and have locked multipliers. Core count differs: the Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads. Base clock differs significantly: 2.70 GHz for the Core 5 211E versus 1.70 GHz for the Core i5-14500T. Boost clock is closer: 4.90 GHz versus 4.80 GHz. Thermal design power differs: 65 W for the Core 5 211E, 35 W for the Core i5-14500T.
Cache allocation differs. Both have 80 KB L1 per core. The Core 5 211E has 2 MB L2 per core and 20 MB shared L3. The Core i5-14500T has 1.25 MB L2 per core and 24 MB shared L3. Die size differs: 257 mm² for the Core 5 211E, 215 mm² for the Core i5-14500T. Integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 211E, UHD Graphics 770 on the Core i5-14500T. Memory bandwidth is listed only for the Core 5 211E at 76.8 GB/s; the Core i5-14500T has no recorded bandwidth figure. Codename and generation differ: Bartlett Lake for the Core 5 211E, Raptor Lake-R for the Core i5-14500T. Release dates differ, with the Core i5-14500T released earlier. Part numbers also differ: SRQERQ65F for the Core 5 211E, SRN3P for the Core i5-14500T.