Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core 7 253PQE Comparison

Intel Core 5 211E and Intel Core 7 253PQE are both 10-core desktop processors from Intel's Bartlett Lake generation, built on the same 10 nm process and using the same Intel Socket 1700. Despite these shared foundations, the two parts are positioned very differently in the database, with the Core 7 253PQE delivering consistently higher scores across every recorded benchmark. The Core 5 211E sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 7 253PQE reaches the 91st percentile. The average benchmark score for the Core 5 211E is 37,829, compared to 55,919 for the Core 7 253PQE, a gap that places the Core 7 253PQE alongside significantly stronger competition in the nearest rival lists.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Intel Core 7 253PQE for any workload that benefits from additional thread count or higher clock speeds. It records 20 threads versus 16 for the Core 5 211E, and its boost clock reaches 5.70 GHz compared to 4.90 GHz. In every one of the 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, the Core 7 253PQE wins, with deltas ranging from -8.7% in single-threaded PassMark tests to -79.1% in the prime number finding test. The Core 5 211E does not win a single recorded comparison.

The Core 5 211E is the lower-power option, with a 65 W TDP versus 125 W for the Core 7 253PQE. It also launches at a lower price point, but the performance gap is substantial. For users who prioritize multi-threaded throughput, the Core 7 253PQE delivers 42.8% higher PassMark multithread scores. For single-threaded tasks, the Core 7 253PQE still leads, but the margin narrows to 8.7%. The Core 5 211E also supports the same DDR4 and DDR5 memory types and includes ECC memory support, making it a viable choice for systems where lower power draw and a lower launch MSRP are more important than peak performance.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PQE has 20 threads, while the Intel Core 5 211E has 16 threads. Both have 10 cores.

Q: How do the single-core Cinebench R23 scores compare?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PQE scores 4,431 in Cinebench R23 single-core, while the Intel Core 5 211E scores 2,878. The Core 7 253PQE leads by 35% in this test.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache capacity?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PQE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core 5 211E has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Both have 80 KB L1 cache per core and 2 MB L2 cache per core.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core 5 211E and the Intel Core 7 253PQE support ECC memory. Both also support DDR4 and DDR5 memory types.

Q: Which processor has a higher integrated graphics model?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PQE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Intel Core 5 211E uses UHD Graphics 730.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has a launch MSRP of $221, and the Intel Core 7 253PQE has a launch MSRP of $409.

Architecture Differences

Both processors come from the Bartlett Lake codename and are manufactured by Intel on a 10 nm process node. They share the same L1 cache structure at 80 KB per core and the same L2 cache at 2 MB per core. The key architectural distinction is the L3 cache: the Core 5 211E has 20 MB shared, while the Core 7 253PQE has 33 MB shared. This additional cache capacity on the Core 7 253PQE coincides with its higher thread count and clock speeds.

The Core 5 211E has a die size of 257 mm², while the die size for the Core 7 253PQE is not recorded in the database. Both processors support dual-channel memory, with the Core 5 211E offering 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth and the Core 7 253PQE offering 89.6 GB/s. Both use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics differ, with the Core 5 211E featuring UHD Graphics 730 and the Core 7 253PQE featuring UHD Graphics 770. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both use the Intel Socket 1700.

Specification Differences

The most significant specification difference is thread count: the Core 5 211E provides 16 threads, while the Core 7 253PQE provides 20 threads. Base clocks also differ substantially, with the Core 5 211E running at 2.70 GHz and the Core 7 253PQE at 3.50 GHz. Boost clocks follow the same pattern, at 4.90 GHz for the Core 5 211E and 5.70 GHz for the Core 7 253PQE. The TDP rating is 65 W for the Core 5 211E and 125 W for the Core 7 253PQE.

Memory bandwidth is another differentiator, with the Core 5 211E rated at 76.8 GB/s and the Core 7 253PQE at 89.6 GB/s. The L3 cache is 20 MB on the Core 5 211E and 33 MB on the Core 7 253PQE. Integrated graphics differ as well, with UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 211E and UHD Graphics 770 on the Core 7 253PQE. The release dates are distinct, with the Core 5 211E appearing in the database earlier than the Core 7 253PQE. The Core 5 211E has a listed die size of 257 mm², while the Core 7 253PQE does not have a recorded die size.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Core 7 253PQE dominates the benchmark comparisons, winning all 17 recorded tests. The smallest margin is in PassMark single-thread and singlethread tests, where the Core 7 253PQE scores 4,389 against 4,006 for the Core 5 211E, a delta of -8.7%. The largest margin is in PassMark find prime numbers, where the Core 7 253PQE scores 206 versus 43, a delta of -79.1%. PassMark physics also shows a wide gap, with the Core 7 253PQE at 2,970 and the Core 5 211E at 702, a delta of -76.4%.

In Cinebench tests, the Core 7 253PQE is consistently about 35% ahead. Cinebench R23 multicore shows 31,390 for the Core 7 253PQE against 20,389 for the Core 5 211E. Cinebench R23 single-core shows 4,431 versus 2,878. Cinebench R20 multicore scores are 13,183 and 8,563, while single-core scores are 1,861 and 1,208. Cinebench R15 follows the same pattern, with multicore scores of 3,163 and 2,055, and single-core scores of 446 and 289.

PassMark integer math shows the Core 7 253PQE at 137,795 versus 88,117 for the Core 5 211E, a delta of -36.1%. Floating-point math scores are 105,279 and 66,402, a delta of -36.9%. Data compression scores are 487,335 and 346,757, a delta of -28.8%. Data encryption shows 25,515 against 17,938, a delta of -29.7%. Extended instructions scores are 32,390 and 21,592, a delta of -33.3%. Random string sorting shows 54,222 versus 34,308, a delta of -36.7%. The PassMark multithread score for the Core 7 253PQE is 41,656, which is 42.8% higher than the 23,833 recorded for the Core 5 211E.

The average benchmark score for the Core 7 253PQE is 55,919, placing it near the Intel Core i9-14900HX (56,004, delta -0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 (56,273, delta -0.6%). The Core 5 211E, with an average score of 37,829, sits close to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 (37,762, delta 0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37,904, delta -0.2%). The percentile data reinforces this positioning: the Core 5 211E is in the 86th percentile, while the Core 7 253PQE is in the 91st percentile. The recorded benchmark results indicate that the Core 7 253PQE is the stronger processor in every measured category, with the Core 5 211E offering a lower TDP and a lower launch MSRP as its primary distinguishing features.