Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core 7 251E Comparison
Intel Core 5 211E
Core 7 251E
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core 7 251E
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The Intel Core 5 211E and Intel Core 7 251E are both Bartlett Lake processors on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, but the benchmark database contains a complete set of measurements for only one of them. The Core 5 211E has recorded scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and the Passmark suite, while the Core 7 251E currently has no benchmark entries in the database. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible for most workloads.
What the data does show is the Core 5 211E's absolute performance profile. In Cinebench R23, it scores 20389 points in multi-core and 2878 points in single-core. The R20 run produces 8563 multi-core and 1208 single-core, while R15 yields 2055 multi-core and 289 single-core. These results place the Core 5 211E at the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database.
The average benchmark score for the Core 5 211E is 37829. Its nearest rivals in the database are tightly clustered. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37804, a delta of 0.1 percent. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 37762, a 0.2 percent gap. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904, putting the Intel part 0.2 percent behind. The Intel Core i9-14901E scores 37911, also 0.2 percent ahead. These deltas are all within noise, meaning the Core 5 211E lands in a performance band essentially identical to those four processors.
Passmark results for the Core 5 211E show its strongest areas. The multithread score is 23833, single-thread is 4006, integer math reaches 88117, and floating-point math hits 66402. Data compression scores 346757, data encryption 17938, extended instructions 21592, and random string sorting 34308. The physics test scores 702, and the find prime numbers test returns 43.
The Core 7 251E has no recorded scores, no nearest rivals, and an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentile is listed at 50, which reflects the absence of data rather than measured performance. The database cannot currently confirm any head-to-head win for either processor, as the head-to-head benchmark table is empty and both win counters are zero.
Where Each One Wins
Because the Core 7 251E has no benchmark entries, the only use-case analysis that can be grounded in measured data applies to the Core 5 211E. The Passmark suite provides a split across workload types. The Core 5 211E shows a strong showing in data compression with a score of 346757, which is the highest single Passmark value recorded for the chip. Integer math at 88117 and floating-point math at 66402 both indicate solid general-purpose compute capabilities. Data encryption at 17938 and extended instructions at 21592 round out the encryption and SIMD-oriented workloads.
The single-thread Passmark score of 4006, paired with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2878, indicates that lightly threaded tasks are handled well. The multi-core Cinebench figures, particularly the R23 score of 20389, show that the 10-core, 16-thread configuration scales effectively across all cores.
For the Core 7 251E, the database currently offers no measured wins in any category. The chip's specifications do show a larger configuration: 24 cores, 32 threads, and a 36 MB shared L3 cache versus the Core 5 211E's 20 MB. The boost clock is also higher at 5.60 GHz versus 4.90 GHz. Those architectural differences suggest where the Core 7 251E might perform differently, but no benchmark results exist to confirm it.
Architecture Differences
Both processors share the same Bartlett Lake codename, the same 10 nm process node, the same Intel foundry, the same 257 mm² die size, and the same Intel Socket 1700. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, both support ECC memory, and both expose PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Both were released on the same date, 2025-01-12, and both are currently listed as Active production parts.
The core configurations differ substantially. The Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 7 251E has 24 cores and 32 threads. Base clocks are 2.70 GHz for the Core 5 211E and 2.10 GHz for the Core 7 251E. Boost clocks are 4.90 GHz and 5.60 GHz respectively. The Core 7 251E therefore has a lower base clock but a higher boost clock, which is consistent with a larger core count drawing from the same 65 watt TDP envelope.
Cache hierarchies are also different. Both chips use 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core. The shared L3 cache is 20 MB on the Core 5 211E and 36 MB on the Core 7 251E. Memory bandwidth differs as well: the Core 5 211E lists 76.8 GB/s, while the Core 7 251E lists 89.6 GB/s.
Integrated graphics differ: the Core 5 211E uses UHD Graphics 730, and the Core 7 251E uses UHD Graphics 770. Both chips have locked multipliers, so neither supports unlocked overclocking. The launch MSRP for the Core 5 211E is $221, and the launch MSRP for the Core 7 251E is $384.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores?
A: The Intel Core 7 251E has 24 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads.
Q: What is the boost clock difference?
A: The Core 7 251E boosts to 5.60 GHz, while the Core 5 211E boosts to 4.90 GHz.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: Yes, both the Core 5 211E and the Core 7 251E support ECC memory.
Q: How does the L3 cache compare?
A: The Core 5 211E has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 7 251E has 36 MB of shared L3 cache.
Q: Are there recorded benchmark scores for both processors?
A: No. The database contains full benchmark results for the Core 5 211E, including Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and Passmark tests. The Core 7 251E has no benchmark entries recorded.
Q: What is the memory bandwidth for each?
A: The Core 5 211E has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Core 7 251E has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.
The Verdict
The recorded data allows a clear verdict only for the Intel Core 5 211E. Its average benchmark score of 37829 places it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, and its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and the Intel Core i9-14901E, are all within 0.2 percent. The Core 5 211E is therefore a well-rounded desktop processor in the database's measurements, with strong multi-core Cinebench R23 performance at 20389 and a single-thread score of 2878.
The Intel Core 7 251E cannot be evaluated on measured performance because the database has no benchmark results for it. Its specifications show a larger core count, more threads, more L3 cache, a higher boost clock, and higher memory bandwidth. Those specifications would typically place it in a different performance class than the Core 5 211E, but without recorded scores, any claim about its actual performance would be speculation. The database shows the Core 5 211E as the only one of the two with verified results, and it performs within 0.2 percent of several established rivals. The Core 7 251E remains a specification-only entry for now.