Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core 7 240H Comparison

The Intel Core 5 211E and Intel Core 7 240H are both 10-core, 16-thread Intel processors, but they target different market segments and deliver distinctly different performance profiles. The Core 5 211E is a desktop part on the LGA 1700 socket, while the Core 7 240H is a mobile processor on the BGA 1744 socket. Benchmark data shows the Core 5 211E takes the majority of wins, 13 out of 17 head-to-head tests, while the Core 7 240H secures 4. The Core 5 211E also holds a higher average benchmark score of 37,829 versus 31,483 for the Core 7 240H, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs compared to the 82nd percentile for the mobile chip.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 211E dominates in most compute-heavy workloads, particularly those that stress single-core performance and sustained multi-core rendering. Its most decisive victories come in Cinebench R23, where it leads by 29.3% in multi-core and by a massive 67.4% in single-core. This desktop processor also excels in data compression, scoring 346,757 compared to 271,774 for the Core 7 240H, a 27.6% advantage, and in extended instruction workloads, where it posts a 27.8% lead. The Core 5 211E is the clear choice for content creation, scientific computing, and any task that relies on heavy integer or floating-point math, as it also wins integer math by 9.6% and floating-point math by 12.7%.

The Intel Core 7 240H, despite being the mobile part, shows strength in specific scenarios that favor its design. Its most notable win is in PassMark physics, where it scores 1,723 against 702 for the Core 5 211E, a 59.3% advantage. It also leads in prime number finding, scoring 102 versus 43, a 57.8% margin, and edges out the Core 5 211E in PassMark multithread with a score of 23,975 against 23,833, a slim 0.6% lead. The Core 7 240H also wins Cinebench R15 multi-core with 2,360 versus 2,055, a 12.9% margin. These results indicate the mobile chip has a different scheduling or cache behavior that benefits certain algorithmic workloads, despite its lower overall average score.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share the same 10 nm process node and are both fabricated by Intel, but their underlying designs diverge significantly. The Core 5 211E uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation, while the Core 7 240H uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-H codename and belongs to the Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. The Core 5 211E is a desktop part with a 65 W TDP, while the Core 7 240H is a mobile processor with a 45 W TDP, reflecting the latter's focus on power efficiency for laptops.

Cache configurations also differ. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core, but the Core 5 211E has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core 7 240H has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 5 211E supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Core 7 240H. PCIe lane counts differ as well: the Core 5 211E offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core 7 240H offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ, with the Core 5 211E using UHD Graphics 730 and the Core 7 240H using Iris Xe Graphics 64EU. The Core 5 211E has a die size of 257 mm², while the die size for the Core 7 240H is not recorded.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking divergence appears in Cinebench R23 single-core, where the Core 5 211E scores 2,878 against 1,719 for the Core 7 240H, a 67.4% lead. This is the largest margin in any test and highlights the desktop part's superior per-thread performance, driven by its higher base clock of 2.70 GHz compared to 2.50 GHz and its boost clock of 4.90 GHz versus 5.20 GHz for the mobile chip. The Core 5 211E also leads in Cinebench R23 multi-core, scoring 20,389 versus 15,764, a 29.3% advantage, despite the Core 7 240H having a higher boost clock.

In Cinebench R15, the results split. The Core 5 211E wins single-core with 289 against 249, a 16.1% margin, but the Core 7 240H wins multi-core with 2,360 against 2,055, a 12.9% margin. Cinebench R20 shows a near tie: the Core 5 211E scores 8,563 in multi-core versus 8,562 for the Core 7 240H, a 0% difference, and both score exactly 1,208 in single-core. PassMark tests follow a similar pattern, with the Core 5 211E winning data compression (346,757 vs 271,774), data encryption (17,938 vs 15,155), extended instructions (21,592 vs 16,897), floating-point math (66,402 vs 58,905), integer math (88,117 vs 80,396), random string sorting (34,308 vs 28,866), and single-thread (4,006 vs 3,782). The Core 7 240H counters with wins in find prime numbers (102 vs 43), physics (1,723 vs 702), and a narrow multithread victory (23,975 vs 23,833).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has an average benchmark score of 37,829, while the Intel Core 7 240H scores 31,483, placing the desktop part in the 86th percentile and the mobile part in the 82nd percentile.

Q: How do the two processors compare in single-core Cinebench R23?

A: The Core 5 211E scores 2,878, which is 67.4% higher than the Core 7 240H's 1,719, making it the clear winner in single-threaded rendering.

Q: Does the Core 7 240H win any benchmark by a large margin?

A: Yes, the Core 7 240H wins PassMark physics by 59.3% (1,723 vs 702) and PassMark find prime numbers by 57.8% (102 vs 43), showing a strong edge in specific algorithmic tasks.

Q: What are the memory support differences between the two?

A: Both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory, but only the Core 5 211E supports ECC memory. The Core 5 211E has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Core 7 240H does not have a recorded bandwidth figure.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Core 7 240H has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core 5 211E has 20 MB, a difference that may contribute to the mobile part's wins in physics and prime number tests.

Q: How many head-to-head benchmarks does each processor win?

A: The Core 5 211E wins 13 of the 17 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, while the Core 7 240H wins 4.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The Core 5 211E has a base clock of 2.70 GHz, while the Core 7 240H has a base clock of 2.50 GHz. The Core 7 240H has a higher boost clock at 5.20 GHz, compared to 4.90 GHz for the Core 5 211E. The Core 5 211E has a TDP of 65 W, while the Core 7 240H has a TDP of 45 W. The socket types differ: the Core 5 211E uses Intel Socket 1700, and the Core 7 240H uses Intel BGA 1744. The Core 5 211E is a desktop processor, while the Core 7 240H is a mobile processor. The L3 cache is 20 MB shared for the Core 5 211E and 24 MB shared for the Core 7 240H. The Core 5 211E supports ECC memory, while the Core 7 240H does not. PCIe lane counts differ: the Core 5 211E has Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core 7 240H has Gen 5, 8 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ: the Core 5 211E uses UHD Graphics 730, and the Core 7 240H uses Iris Xe Graphics 64EU. The Core 5 211E has a die size of 257 mm², while the Core 7 240H has no recorded die size. The Core 5 211E was released on 2025-01-12, while the Core 7 240H was released on 2024-12-17. The Core 5 211E has a launch MSRP of $221, while the Core 7 240H has a launch MSRP of $502. The part numbers are SRQERQ65F for the Core 5 211E and SRQ6TQ5ML for the Core 7 240H. Both have 10 cores and 16 threads, 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, use a 10 nm process from Intel, support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel bus, and have locked multipliers.