Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core 7 150HL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 5 211E and Intel Core 7 150HL do not share any directly recorded benchmark scores. The database contains a full suite of measurements for the Core 5 211E, including Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 results, plus PassMark workload scores. The Core 7 150HL has no recorded benchmark entries. Therefore, a direct score-by-score comparison is impossible from the recorded data.

The Core 5 211E delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20389 and a single-core score of 2878. In Cinebench R20, it records 8563 multicore and 1208 single-core. Cinebench R15 shows 2055 multicore and 289 single-core. PassMark results include a single-thread score of 4006, a multithread score of 23833, integer math at 88117, floating point math at 66402, and data compression at 346757.

For the Core 7 150HL, the database has no benchmark scores, no average score, and no rival comparisons. Its percentile rank of 50 against all CPUs is derived from an average benchmark score of 0, which indicates the absence of measured data rather than a genuine performance floor. The Core 5 211E holds a percentile of 86 and an average benchmark score of 37829.

The nearest rivals to the Core 5 211E show how tightly grouped the field is. AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37804, a delta of 0.1% from the Core 5 211E. AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 37762, up 0.2%. AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904, down 0.2%. Intel Core i9-14901E scores 37911, also down 0.2%. The Core 5 211E sits within a 0.2% band across all four rivals, meaning the benchmark results place it statistically level with each of them.

The Core 7 150HL has no rival data to interpret. Its absence of recorded scores means no wins, no losses, and no head-to-head deltas can be computed. The database shows winsA at 0 and winsB at 0, confirming that no comparative benchmark events exist between these two processors.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher benchmark scores in the database?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has a complete set of benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multicore result of 20389 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4006. The Intel Core 7 150HL has no recorded benchmark scores at all, so no comparison can be made.

Q: How does the Core 5 211E compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core 5 211E shows an average benchmark score of 37829. Its closest rival, AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132, scores 37804 (0.1% higher), while AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 37762 (0.2% higher). AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904 (0.2% lower), and Intel Core i9-14901E scores 37911 (0.2% lower). All four rivals fall within a 0.2% margin of the Core 5 211E.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The Core 5 211E sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. The Core 7 150HL sits at the 50th percentile, but that figure corresponds to an average benchmark score of 0, indicating no measured performance data exists for it.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads. The Core 7 150HL offers 4 additional cores and 4 additional threads.

Q: What are the clock speed differences between the two?

A: The Core 5 211E has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Core 7 150HL has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Core 5 211E starts faster, but the Core 7 150HL boosts higher.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The Core 5 211E records a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Core 7 150HL has no memory bandwidth figure in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 211E wins in every measurable benchmark category because it is the only processor with recorded scores. Its Cinebench R23 multicore result of 20389 and single-core result of 2878 establish a performance baseline. PassMark integer math at 88117, floating point math at 66402, and extended instructions at 21592 all come from the Core 5 211E. Data encryption scores 17938, random string sorting scores 34308, and find prime numbers scores 43. These are the only multithread and single-thread measurements available for either processor.

The Core 7 150HL wins in specifications that the database records without benchmark confirmation. It has more cores (14 versus 10), more threads (20 versus 16), and a higher boost clock (5.00 GHz versus 4.90 GHz). It also carries a larger shared L3 cache of 24 MB compared to 20 MB on the Core 5 211E. Its integrated graphics, Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, is a more capable GPU solution than the UHD Graphics 730 found on the Core 5 211E.

For workloads that rely on raw core count and thread parallelism, the Core 7 150HL has the structural advantage on paper. For workloads that depend on measured execution speed, only the Core 5 211E has data to show. The Core 5 211E also wins on power efficiency in one respect: despite a higher TDP of 65 watts versus 45 watts, it delivers all of its recorded performance at that envelope. The Core 7 150HL cannot claim any performance result because none are recorded.

The Core 5 211E wins in percentile ranking at 86 versus 50 for the Core 7 150HL. It also wins on release date recency, launching on 2025-01-12 compared to the Core 7 150HL's 2024-04-07. The Core 5 211E has a launch MSRP of $221, while the Core 7 150HL has no launch MSRP recorded.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across multiple specifications. The Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks differ: 2.70 GHz for the Core 5 211E versus 2.40 GHz for the Core 7 150HL. Boost clocks also differ: 4.90 GHz versus 5.00 GHz, favoring the Core 7 150HL.

TDP ratings differ significantly. The Core 5 211E has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Core 7 150HL has a TDP of 45 watts. Both use Intel Socket 1700. The Core 5 211E uses the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Core 7 150HL uses Raptor Lake-PS. The Core 5 211E is a 10 nm part from Intel; the Core 7 150HL is also 10 nm from Intel. The Core 5 211E has a die size of 257 mm², while the Core 7 150HL has no die size recorded.

L3 cache differs: 20 MB shared on the Core 5 211E versus 24 MB shared on the Core 7 150HL. L1 and L2 cache are identical at 80 KB per core and 2 MB per core respectively. Memory bandwidth is recorded only for the Core 5 211E at 76.8 GB/s; the Core 7 150HL has no bandwidth figure.

ECC memory support differs. The Core 5 211E supports ECC memory; the Core 7 150HL does not. PCIe capabilities differ: the Core 5 211E supports Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core 7 150HL supports Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ: UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 5 211E versus Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on the Core 7 150HL.

Release dates differ by roughly nine months. The Core 5 211E launched on 2025-01-12; the Core 7 150HL launched on 2024-04-07. The Core 5 211E has a part number of SRQERQ65F; the Core 7 150HL has an unknown part number. The Core 5 211E has a launch MSRP of $221; the Core 7 150HL has none recorded. Both processors have locked multipliers.

Architecture Differences

The architecture split is clear. The Core 5 211E belongs to the Bartlett Lake generation, while the Core 7 150HL belongs to the Raptor Lake-PS generation. The Core 5 211E has no explicit architecture field beyond its codename, while the Core 7 150HL is explicitly identified as Raptor Lake architecture.

Both processors are built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry. The Core 5 211E has a die size of 257 mm²; the Core 7 150HL has no die size recorded. Transistor counts are not recorded for either processor.

Cache hierarchy differs only at the L3 level. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core. The Core 5 211E shares 20 MB of L3, while the Core 7 150HL shares 24 MB of L3. Neither processor has 3D V-Cache.

The core and thread counts reflect a structural difference. The Core 7 150HL uses 14 cores and 20 threads, which implies a hybrid configuration with more performance and efficiency core types than the Core 5 211E's 10 cores and 16 threads. The exact core type mix is not recorded in the database.

Memory controllers differ in ECC capability. The Core 5 211E supports ECC memory, a feature typically associated with workstation or embedded reliability requirements. The Core 7 150HL does not support ECC. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, but only the Core 5 211E has a measured memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

PCIe implementation differs by generation and lane count. The Core 5 211E offers Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Core 7 150HL offers Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes. This gives the Core 5 211E a wider and faster interface for expansion devices.

Integrated graphics differ substantially. The Core 5 211E uses UHD Graphics 730, while the Core 7 150HL uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The Iris Xe solution with 96 execution units is a more robust integrated GPU than the UHD 730, which aligns with the Core 7 150HL's higher thread count and larger L3 cache.

Production status is active for both processors, and both are desktop market segments. The Core 5 211E is the newer part by release date, launching on 2025-01-12 versus 2024-04-07 for the Core 7 150HL. The Core 5 211E also carries a higher TDP of 65 watts versus 45 watts, which may reflect a different power delivery design despite the shared socket.