Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core 5 315 Comparison
Intel Core 5 211E
Core 5 315
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core 5 315
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The benchmark data shows a dominant performance profile for the Intel Core 5 211E across most workloads, with 13 wins against 4 for the Intel Core 5 315. The largest deltas appear in compute-heavy integer and compression tasks, while the 315 takes narrow or specialized victories.
In Cinebench testing, the 211E is consistently ahead by a fixed 57.1% margin. The R15 multicore score is 2055 versus 1308, R20 multicore is 8563 versus 5452, and R23 multicore is 20389 versus 12981. Single-core results follow the same pattern: R15 single-core is 289 against 184, R20 single-core is 1208 against 769, and R23 single-core is 2878 against 1832. This uniformity suggests the performance gap is structural, not workload-specific.
PassMark integer math delivers the widest gap in the entire comparison. The 211E scores 88117 against 31690, a 178.1% advantage. Data compression shows a 137.3% delta, with 346757 versus 146143. Random string sorting is also heavily skewed, 34308 versus 17551, a 95.5% difference. Extended instructions favor the 211E by 64.3%, scoring 21592 versus 13143. Data encryption shows a 61.3% lead, 17938 versus 11119. Floating point math is 56.5% higher on the 211E, 66402 versus 42441. PassMark multithread lands at 23833 versus 15272, a 56.1% advantage.
The 315 wins only four tests, and three of those are narrow. PassMark single-thread shows 4021 versus 4006, a 0.4% edge for the 315. The two notable exceptions are physics and prime number finding. PassMark physics goes to the 315 with 1163 versus 702, a 39.6% margin. PassMark find prime numbers shows 112 versus 43, a 61.6% advantage for the 315. These results indicate the 315 has a different compute profile, likely favoring certain instruction patterns or lower-latency execution.
The average benchmark score tells the same story at a glance: the 211E sits at 37829, while the 315 sits at 18188. The 211E ranks in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, the 315 in the 72nd. The 211E’s nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at 37804 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 at 37762 (0.2% behind), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 37904 (0.2% ahead). The 315’s nearest rivals are the AMD EPYC 9274F at 18189, the Intel Core i7-9700 at 18180, the Intel Core i7-1365U at 18177, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700U at 18176, all within 0.1% of the 315.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core throughput in Cinebench R23?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E scores 20389 in Cinebench R23 multicore, versus 12981 for the Intel Core 5 315, a 57.1% advantage.
Q: Does the Intel Core 5 315 win any benchmark by a wide margin?
A: Yes, the 315 wins PassMark find prime numbers by 61.6% (112 versus 43) and PassMark physics by 39.6% (1163 versus 702). These are the only two large wins for the 315.
Q: How close is single-thread performance between the two?
A: The PassMark single-thread scores are nearly identical: 4021 for the 315 and 4006 for the 211E, a 0.4% difference. However, in Cinebench R23 single-core, the 211E leads by 57.1% (2878 versus 1832).
Q: What is the overall benchmark percentile ranking for each?
A: The Intel Core 5 211E is in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core 5 315 is in the 72nd percentile.
Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?
A: The 211E has an average benchmark score of 37829, more than double the 18188 average of the 315.
Q: Are the nearest rivals for these two processors similar in performance?
A: No. The 211E’s nearest rivals are all near the 37800 to 37900 average score range (AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132, AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Intel Core i9-14901E). The 315’s nearest rivals are all near 18180 to 18189 (AMD EPYC 9274F, Intel Core i7-9700, Intel Core i7-1365U, AMD Ryzen 7 5700U).
The Verdict
The data points to a clear split: the Intel Core 5 211E is the stronger compute processor in nearly every measured category. Its 178.1% lead in integer math and 137.3% lead in data compression indicate a substantial advantage for CPU-heavy workloads, rendering, and batch processing. The 57.1% consistent lead across all Cinebench versions reinforces this, as does the 86th percentile ranking.
The Intel Core 5 315 is only competitive in single-thread PassMark tests, where it edges out the 211E by 0.4%, and in two specialized workloads: physics and prime number finding. Its 39.6% physics win and 61.6% prime number win show that the 315 can outperform in specific instruction sequences, possibly due to its higher base efficiency or different microarchitecture behavior. However, these wins do not offset the overall average score gap of 19641 points.
For applications that rely on floating-point physics simulations or prime number sieving, the 315 has a measurable advantage. For all other general-purpose computing, multithreaded rendering, data compression, encryption, and integer-heavy tasks, the 211E is the decisive choice. The 72nd percentile ranking of the 315 places it among mainstream mobile processors, while the 211E sits in the upper tier of desktop parts.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 5 315 has 6 cores and 6 threads. Base clocks are 2.70 GHz for the 211E and 1.50 GHz for the 315. Boost clocks are 4.90 GHz versus 4.40 GHz. Thermal design power is 65 watts for the 211E and 15 watts for the 315.
Socket types are incompatible: the 211E uses Intel Socket 1700, the 315 uses Intel BGA 1516. The 211E supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The 315 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a single-channel bus and 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported on the 211E but not on the 315.
PCIe capability differs as well: the 211E offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes, the 315 offers Gen 4 with 6 lanes. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730 on the 211E and Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) on the 315. The market segment is Desktop for the 211E and Mobile for the 315. Launch MSRP is $221 for the 211E and $340 for the 315. The 211E released on 2025-01-12, while the 315 released on 2026-04-15.
Architecture Differences
The two chips come from different Intel families. The 211E is based on the Bartlett Lake codename, while the 315 is based on Wildcat Lake. Process nodes are distinct: the 211E uses a 10 nm node, the 315 uses a 3 nm node. Both are fabricated by Intel, but the die size is recorded only for the 211E at 257 mm²; the 315 has no die size data.
Cache hierarchies are fundamentally different. The 211E allocates 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core, with 20 MB of shared L3. The 315 has a total L1 of 192 KB, 2.5 MB of L2, and only 6 MB of shared L3. The 211E’s per-core L2 design scales with core count, while the 315 uses a smaller fixed L2. The L3 difference is significant: 20 MB versus 6 MB, which contributes to the 211E’s large lead in data-heavy workloads.
The generations are listed as Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) for the 211E and Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) for the 315. Part numbers are SRQERQ65F and SAEFC respectively. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The 315’s 3 nm node and 15 watt TDP indicate a low-power design intended for mobile platforms, while the 211E’s 10 nm node and 65 watt TDP reflect a desktop-oriented part with higher power delivery. The 315’s single-channel memory bus and Gen 4 PCIe lanes further confirm its mobile positioning, whereas the 211E’s dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support and Gen 5 PCIe align with desktop workloads.