Intel Core 5 210H vs Intel Core i5-13400F Comparison
Intel Core 5 210H
Core i5-13400F
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 5 210H vs Intel Core i5-13400F
The Verdict
The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i5-13400F wins every single head-to-head benchmark in the database, taking all 17 recorded tests against the Intel Core 5 210H. The average benchmark scores confirm the gap, with the i5-13400F posting 25,292 versus the Core 5 210H's 24,872. Both processors sit at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, which places them in the same broad performance tier, but the margin between them is consistent and often large.
The i5-13400F is the pick for desktop users who want maximum compute throughput without an integrated GPU. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 22,604 versus the Core 5 210H's 11,830 is a staggering 91.1% advantage, and that pattern repeats across every workload. The Core 5 210H, despite its higher 4.80 GHz boost clock, cannot close the gap in any measured test. For laptop buyers, the Core 5 210H is the only sensible choice among these two, since the i5-13400F is a Socket 1700 desktop part. But the benchmark data offers no scenario where the Core 5 210H wins a performance comparison.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core i5-13400F wins every single recorded benchmark. That is not an exaggeration: 17 wins out of 17 head-to-head tests. The closest contest is in single-thread PassMark, where the i5-13400F scores 3,634 versus the Core 5 210H's 3,539, a narrow 2.7% margin. That small delta suggests the two chips have similar single-core ceiling when the workload does not scale across many threads. But even there, the i5-13400F holds the advantage.
The largest wins for the i5-13400F come in multicore-heavy tasks. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows a 91.1% lead, and Cinebench R23 single-core still gives the i5-13400F an 80.2% advantage. The pattern holds across PassMark workloads: data compression is 43% faster, extended instructions 48.4% faster, and prime number finding 56.6% faster. For the Core 5 210H, there is no benchmark category where it leads; the closest it comes is the single-thread PassMark tests, where it trails by only 2.7%.
The i5-13400F wins decisively in every category that involves parallel processing, which includes physics simulation (38.2% ahead), floating-point math (34.4% ahead), and integer math (30% ahead). The Core 5 210H has an integrated Iris Xe Graphics 48EU, which the i5-13400F lacks, but the benchmark data does not include integrated graphics performance. For CPU-only workloads, the i5-13400F is the clear winner, and the Core 5 210H is not competitive in any measured metric.
Architecture Differences
Both processors share the same Raptor Lake architecture family, but they are distinct products built for different sockets and markets. The i5-13400F is a desktop part with the codename Raptor Lake-S, while the Core 5 210H is a mobile part with the codename Raptor Lake-H. Both are built on Intel's 10 nm process, and both are manufactured by Intel. The i5-13400F has a die size of 215 mm², while the Core 5 210H's die size is not recorded in the database.
The core counts differ significantly. The i5-13400F has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 5 210H has 8 cores and 12 threads. The i5-13400F has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Core 5 210H has a lower base clock of 2.20 GHz but a higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Despite the higher boost clock, the Core 5 210H cannot overcome the core deficit.
The cache layouts are also different. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and a 2 MB L2 cache per core in the Core 5 210H, but the i5-13400F has a smaller L2 cache at 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is a larger difference: the i5-13400F has 20 MB shared, whereas the Core 5 210H has only 12 MB shared. The i5-13400F's larger shared cache is one factor in its superior multi-core results.
The memory support is identical: both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory buses. Neither supports ECC memory. The PCIe configuration differs, with the i5-13400F offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) and the Core 5 210H offering Gen 5 with 8 lanes. The i5-13400F has no integrated graphics, while the Core 5 210H includes Iris Xe Graphics 48EU. The i5-13400F uses Socket 1700 for desktop, while the Core 5 210H uses BGA 1744 for mobile.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core 5 210H has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core i5-13400F's 4.60 GHz. However, the i5-13400F still wins every benchmark despite the lower boost clock.
Q: Does the i5-13400F have more cores and threads?
A: Yes. The i5-13400F has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 5 210H has 8 cores and 12 threads. This extra parallel capacity is evident in the multi-core benchmark results.
Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?
A: The i5-13400F has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core 5 210H has 12 MB. The i5-13400F also has a smaller L2 cache per core at 1.25 MB, compared to 2 MB per core for the Core 5 210H.
Q: Are both processors on the same manufacturing process?
A: Yes. Both are built on Intel's 10 nm process and are made by Intel.
Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?
A: The Intel Core 5 210H has Iris Xe Graphics 48EU, while the Intel Core i5-13400F does not have any integrated graphics.
Q: What are the market segments for each?
A: The i5-13400F is a desktop processor with a 65 W TDP, while the Core 5 210H is a mobile processor with a 45 W TDP.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The largest single win for the i5-13400F is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it scores 22,604 against the Core 5 210H's 11,830, a 91.1% advantage. This is the biggest proportional gap in the entire dataset. The Cinebench R23 single-core test also shows a massive 80.2% lead, with the i5-13400F posting 3,191 versus 1,771. That single-core result is surprising given the higher boost clock on the Core 5 210H, but the data is clear.
In the older Cinebench R20 tests, the i5-13400F is 36.7% ahead in both multi-core and single-core. The multi-core score is 8,892 versus 6,504, and the single-core score is 1,255 versus 918. Cinebench R15 shows a similar pattern with 29.7% and 30% advantages, respectively.
PassMark tests show a consistent wall of wins for the i5-13400F. The largest PassMark lead is in prime number finding: 83 versus 53, a 56.6% advantage. Extended instructions show 19,847 versus 13,370, which is 48.4% ahead. Data compression is 311,364 versus 217,805, a 43% gap. The i5-13400F also leads in floating-point math (60,539 versus 45,057, up 34.4%), integer math (79,942 versus 61,503, up 30%), multithread (25,032 versus 18,252, up 37.1%), physics (1,437 versus 1,040, up 38.2%), and random string sorting (32,076 versus 23,451, up 36.8%). The data encryption test shows 16,608 versus 12,187, a 36.3% lead.
The closest contest is in PassMark single-thread, where the i5-13400F scores 3,634 against the Core 5 210H's 3,539. That is a 2.7% difference, which is the only head-to-head result under 30%. The same 2.7% margin appears in the PassMark singlethread test, which is listed separately but shows identical scores. The i5-13400F wins every single test, and the only competitive margin is in single-threaded workloads.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ across nearly every key specification field. The i5-13400F has 10 cores and 16 threads, whereas the Core 5 210H has 8 cores and 12 threads. The base clock is higher for the i5-13400F at 2.50 GHz, while the Core 5 210H is at 2.20 GHz. The boost clock is higher for the Core 5 210H at 4.80 GHz, versus 4.60 GHz for the i5-13400F. The TDP is 65 W for the i5-13400F and 45 W for the Core 5 210H.
The sockets are different: the i5-13400F uses the Intel Socket 1700, while the Core 5 210H uses the Intel BGA 1744. The process node is the same at 10 nm, but the die size is 215 mm² for the i5-13400F and is not recorded for the Core 5 210H. The L2 cache per core is 1.25 MB for the i5-13400F and 2 MB for the Core 5 210H. The L3 cache is 20 MB shared for the i5-13400F and 12 MB shared for the Core 5 210H.
The PCIe implementation differs: the i5-13400F has Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the Core 5 210H has Gen 5 with 8 lanes. The i5-13400F has no integrated graphics, while the Core 5 210H has Iris Xe Graphics 48EU. The market segment is Desktop for the i5-13400F and Mobile for the Core 5 210H. The release dates are also different: the i5-13400F was released on 2023-01-03, while the Core 5 210H was released on 2024-12-17. The launch MSRP is $196 for the i5-13400F and $342 for the Core 5 210H. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory, and neither has ECC support. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.