Intel Core 5 130UL vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for the Intel Core 5 130UL versus the Intel Core i5-14501E. Both processors have zero benchmark scores listed in their respective entries, and the head-to-head comparison table is empty. The wins count for each processor is zero, meaning neither chip has a recorded advantage in direct testing.

This absence of measured performance data is notable given the specification differences between the two parts. The Core 5 130UL offers 10 cores and 12 threads, while the Core i5-14501E offers 6 cores and 12 threads. Thread counts match at 12, but the physical core counts differ by four. The Core i5-14501E operates at a higher base clock of 3.30 GHz compared to the Core 5 130UL's 1.60 GHz, and it boosts to 5.20 GHz versus 4.70 GHz. These clock advantages suggest the Core i5-14501E would likely perform better in single-threaded and lightly threaded workloads, but without benchmark data, this remains a projection from specifications rather than a measured result.

The lack of recorded benchmarks means the database cannot confirm which processor delivers superior multi-threaded performance. The Core 5 130UL has four additional physical cores, which could benefit heavily parallel workloads, but the Core i5-14501E's higher clock speeds across all cores might offset that advantage in some scenarios. The data simply does not resolve this question.

Both processors sit at the 50th percentile among all CPUs in the database, indicating they occupy the median position in overall performance distribution. This percentile ranking is identical for both parts, suggesting the database treats them as statistically equivalent in expected performance, despite their architectural differences.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the Raptor Lake architecture and use a 10 nm process node from Intel. The Core 5 130UL carries the codename Raptor Lake-PS and belongs to the Core 5 generation, while the Core i5-14501E uses the codename Raptor Lake-R and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. This places the Core i5-14501E as a later refinement of the same underlying architecture.

The core configurations differ significantly. The Core 5 130UL has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads. Both processors use the same per-core cache structure: 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. The shared L3 cache differs, with the Core 5 130UL providing 12 MB and the Core i5-14501E providing 24 MB. The Core i5-14501E doubles the L3 cache capacity, which can improve performance in workloads that benefit from larger shared cache pools, such as database queries or certain scientific computations.

The die size is recorded only for the Core i5-14501E at 215 mm². The Core 5 130UL has no die size listed in the database. This absence of data makes direct physical comparison impossible, but the larger L3 cache in the Core i5-14501E suggests a larger die footprint, consistent with its 215 mm² measurement.

Memory support is identical for both: DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel configuration. The Core i5-14501E adds ECC memory support, while the Core 5 130UL does not support ECC memory. This difference targets users who require error-correcting memory for data integrity in workstations or servers.

PCIe connectivity differs substantially. The Core 5 130UL provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU, while the Core i5-14501E provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The Core i5-14501E offers double the lane count and a newer PCIe generation, enabling higher bandwidth for GPUs and NVMe storage. The Core 5 130UL's Gen 4, 8-lane configuration is more limited for expansion.

Integrated graphics also differ. The Core 5 130UL uses Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units, while the Core i5-14501E uses UHD Graphics 770. The Iris Xe solution with 80 EUs generally provides stronger integrated graphics performance compared to UHD Graphics 770, though the database does not include specific graphics benchmarks for either part.

The thermal design power differs by a wide margin. The Core 5 130UL is rated at 15 W TDP, while the Core i5-14501E is rated at 65 W TDP. The Core 5 130UL uses far less power, making it suitable for compact or passively cooled systems, while the Core i5-14501E demands more substantial cooling and power delivery.

Both processors use Intel Socket 1700 and are currently active in production. The Core 5 130UL was released on 2024-04-07, while the Core i5-14501E was released later on 2024-06-30. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both are desktop market segment parts.

The Verdict

The data indicates the Core i5-14501E is positioned for higher raw performance potential. Its boost clock of 5.20 GHz exceeds the Core 5 130UL's 4.70 GHz by 500 MHz, and its base clock of 3.30 GHz is more than double the Core 5 130UL's 1.60 GHz. The Core i5-14501E also provides 24 MB of L3 cache versus 12 MB, double the cache capacity. These specification advantages suggest the Core i5-14501E would deliver stronger performance in single-threaded tasks and in workloads that benefit from larger cache, such as gaming or certain productivity applications.

The Core i5-14501E also offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, doubling the lane count of the Core 5 130UL's Gen 4, 8-lane configuration. This makes the Core i5-14501E more suitable for systems with high-bandwidth peripherals, including modern GPUs and fast NVMe drives. The ECC memory support adds another layer of capability for reliability-focused builds.

The Core 5 130UL counters with a 15 W TDP, which is 50 W lower than the Core i5-14501E's 65 W TDP. This efficiency advantage makes the Core 5 130UL attractive for power-constrained environments, small form factor systems, or always-on machines where heat and energy consumption are primary concerns. The 10-core configuration also provides more physical cores than the Core i5-14501E's 6-core setup, which could benefit certain parallel workloads despite the lower clock speeds.

Users requiring sustained high clock speeds, large cache, ECC support, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity should consider the Core i5-14501E. Users prioritizing low power consumption and a higher physical core count should consider the Core 5 130UL. The absence of benchmark data means these conclusions derive entirely from specification analysis, not measured performance.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 5 130UL has 10 cores, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores.

Q: Do these processors support the same memory types?

A: Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Core i5-14501E adds ECC memory support, which the Core 5 130UL lacks.

Q: What is the thermal design power difference?

A: The Core 5 130UL is rated at 15 W TDP, while the Core i5-14501E is rated at 65 W TDP, a difference of 50 W.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E boosts to 5.20 GHz, exceeding the Core 5 130UL's boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: How does the L3 cache compare?

A: The Core 5 130UL has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core i5-14501E has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, doubling the capacity.

Q: What PCIe versions do these processors support?

A: The Core 5 130UL supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU, while the Core i5-14501E supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 130UL wins in power efficiency, with a 15 W TDP versus the Core i5-14501E's 65 W TDP. This makes the Core 5 130UL preferable for systems where energy consumption and heat dissipation are critical constraints, such as fanless designs, compact enclosures, or battery-backed installations. The 10-core configuration provides more physical cores, which could benefit workloads that scale with core count rather than clock speed, such as certain rendering tasks or virtual machine hosting.

The Core i5-14501E wins in clock speed, cache capacity, connectivity, and memory flexibility. Its 3.30 GHz base clock and 5.20 GHz boost clock are substantially higher than the Core 5 130UL's 1.60 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost. The 24 MB L3 cache doubles the Core 5 130UL's 12 MB, benefiting workloads with large working sets. The PCIe Gen 5, 16-lane interface provides double the lanes and a newer generation, enabling higher bandwidth for expansion cards and storage. The ECC memory support allows operation in environments requiring error correction, which the Core 5 130UL cannot provide.

The Core i5-14501E also includes a larger die size at 215 mm², though the Core 5 130UL has no recorded die size for comparison. The Core i5-14501E uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core 5 130UL uses Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units. Without graphics benchmarks, the database cannot determine which integrated solution performs better, but the Iris Xe branding typically indicates a higher-tier integrated GPU.

For single-threaded applications like legacy software or lightly threaded games, the Core i5-14501E's higher clocks give it a clear specification advantage. For multi-threaded workloads that respond to additional physical cores, the Core 5 130UL's 10-core design may hold an advantage, though its lower clock speeds could limit performance in workloads that require both high core counts and high frequencies.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several recorded fields. Core count: the Core 5 130UL has 10 cores, the Core i5-14501E has 6 cores. Thread count matches at 12 for both. Base clock: 1.60 GHz for the Core 5 130UL, 3.30 GHz for the Core i5-14501E. Boost clock: 4.70 GHz for the Core 5 130UL, 5.20 GHz for the Core i5-14501E. Thermal design power: 15 W for the Core 5 130UL, 65 W for the Core i5-14501E.

Cache: L1 and L2 are identical at 80 KB per core and 1.25 MB per core respectively, but L3 differs at 12 MB shared for the Core 5 130UL and 24 MB shared for the Core i5-14501E. Die size is listed only for the Core i5-14501E at 215 mm²; the Core 5 130UL has no recorded die size.

Memory: both support DDR4 and DDR5 dual-channel, but ECC memory is supported only on the Core i5-14501E. PCIe: the Core 5 130UL uses Gen 4 with 8 lanes, the Core i5-14501E uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: the Core 5 130UL uses Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, the Core i5-14501E uses UHD Graphics 770.

Codename and generation: the Core 5 130UL is Raptor Lake-PS in the Core 5 generation, the Core i5-14501E is Raptor Lake-R in the Core 14th Gen series, specifically Raptor Lake Refresh. Release dates: the Core 5 130UL launched on 2024-04-07, the Core i5-14501E launched on 2024-06-30. Manufacturing process is identical at 10 nm from Intel, and both use Intel Socket 1700. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both are active in production.