Intel Core 5 130HL vs Intel Core 9 273PE Comparison

Intel Core 5 130HL and Intel Core 9 273PE are two desktop processors sharing the same Intel Socket 1700, but they are positioned very differently. The data shows the Core 9 273PE is the clear performance leader, with a benchmark average of 49,845 points and a 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs. In contrast, the Core 5 130HL has no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and sits at the 50th percentile. This is not a close contest; the Core 9 273PE delivers substantially higher multi-threaded performance, while the Core 5 130HL offers a lower-power alternative with a more modest feature set.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Core 9 273PE has a full suite of benchmark results in the database, while the Core 5 130HL has none. This makes a direct head-to-head comparison one-sided, but the Core 9 273PE's absolute scores and its position against known rivals still tell a clear story.

For multi-threaded workloads, the Core 9 273PE records a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31,288. Its Cinebench R20 multicore score is 13,140, and its Cinebench R15 multicore score is 3,153. In the Passmark suite, the multi-thread score is 36,810, with integer math at 139,410 and floating point math at 107,884. Data compression scores 405,885, while data encryption scores 22,719. Random string sorting reaches 45,098, and extended instructions score 24,630. The physics test scores 3,120, and finding prime numbers scores 203.

Single-thread performance for the Core 9 273PE is also strong. Cinebench R23 singlecore is 4,417, Cinebench R20 singlecore is 1,855, and Cinebench R15 singlecore is 445. Passmark single-thread is 3,650, which is consistent across both singlethread and single_thread entries.

The Core 9 273PE's average benchmark score of 49,845 places it 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388, which scores 49,796. It is 0.9% above the Intel Core i5-14600KF, which scores 49,394. Against the Intel Core i9-13980HX, the Core 9 273PE is 1.1% behind, as that rival scores 50,398. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 50,448, putting the Core 9 273PE 1.2% behind that part as well.

Since the Core 5 130HL has no recorded scores, the database shows zero wins for it and zero wins for the Core 9 273PE in a head-to-head array. That does not mean the Core 5 130HL is competitive. It means the measurements are absent. The only conclusion the data supports is that the Core 9 273PE has verified performance numbers, and the Core 5 130HL does not.

The Verdict

The verdict is straightforward: the Intel Core 9 273PE is the higher-performing processor in every measurable category. Its 12 cores and 24 threads allow it to process more simultaneous work than the Core 5 130HL's 12 cores and 16 threads. The Core 9 273PE's boost clock of 5.70 GHz exceeds the Core 5 130HL's 4.80 GHz, and its shared L3 cache of 36 MB is double the 18 MB found on the Core 5 130HL.

The Core 5 130HL is not a failure; it is simply unmeasured. With a 45 W TDP versus the Core 9 273PE's 65 W, the Core 5 130HL is the lower-power choice. It also uses Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and Raptor Lake-PS codename, while the Core 9 273PE uses Bartlett Lake. For anyone choosing between these two, the Core 9 273PE is the one with verified performance data and a 90th percentile ranking. The Core 5 130HL cannot be recommended from the database because no benchmark results exist for it.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on different architectures. The Core 5 130HL is based on Raptor Lake, with the codename Raptor Lake-PS and the generation listed as Core 5 (Raptor Lake-PS). The Core 9 273PE is based on Bartlett Lake, with the generation listed as Core 9 (Bartlett Lake). Both use a 10 nm process node and are manufactured by Intel.

Core counts are identical at 12, but thread counts differ. The Core 5 130HL has 16 threads, while the Core 9 273PE has 24 threads. This indicates the Core 9 273PE likely uses a different core configuration that enables more simultaneous threads per core, although the database does not specify the exact mix of performance and efficiency cores.

Cache hierarchy is another key difference. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core. The shared L3 cache, however, is 18 MB on the Core 5 130HL and 36 MB on the Core 9 273PE. This larger L3 cache on the Core 9 273PE can reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 5 130HL uses Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while the Core 9 273PE uses UHD Graphics 730. The Core 5 130HL's Iris Xe branding suggests a higher-tier integrated GPU, but the database does not provide performance scores for either graphics solution.

Memory support is similar: both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory buses. The Core 9 273PE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core 5 130HL lists no memory bandwidth figure. The Core 5 130HL does not support ECC memory, while the Core 9 273PE does support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities are different. The Core 5 130HL provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the Core 9 273PE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This gives the Core 9 273PE twice the CPU-attached PCIe lanes and a newer PCIe generation, which matters for high-bandwidth devices like GPUs and NVMe storage.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PE has 24 threads, while the Intel Core 5 130HL has 16 threads, despite both having 12 cores.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The Core 9 273PE boosts up to 5.70 GHz, while the Core 5 130HL boosts up to 4.80 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory buses. The Core 9 273PE also supports ECC memory, while the Core 5 130HL does not.

Q: How does the Core 9 273PE compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 49,845 is 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 (49,796), 0.9% above the Intel Core i5-14600KF (49,394), 1.1% below the Intel Core i9-13980HX (50,398), and 1.2% below the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (50,448).

Q: What is the L3 cache size on each processor?

A: The Core 5 130HL has 18 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core 9 273PE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The Core 9 273PE has a TDP of 65 W, while the Core 5 130HL has a TDP of 45 W.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PE wins in every category with recorded data. Its 24 threads, 5.70 GHz boost clock, 36 MB L3 cache, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes make it the choice for heavy multi-threaded workloads such as rendering, data compression, and encryption tasks. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31,288 and Passmark multithread score of 36,810 confirm strong parallel performance. Single-thread work also favors the Core 9 273PE, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3,650 and Cinebench R23 singlecore of 4,417. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and ECC support add further appeal for data-integrity-sensitive applications.

The Intel Core 5 130HL wins only in the absence of data. It has no benchmark scores, so no performance claim can be made from the database. Its advantages are structural: a lower TDP of 45 W versus 65 W, and an integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, which is a more capable integrated GPU on paper than the UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 9 273PE. The Core 5 130HL also uses PCIe Gen 4, which is older but sufficient for many mainstream uses. For users prioritizing lower power draw or a stronger integrated GPU, the Core 5 130HL has those features, but no performance verification exists to support any workload-specific win.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on several specification fields. The Core 5 130HL has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while the Core 9 273PE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The Core 5 130HL has a TDP of 45 W; the Core 9 273PE has a TDP of 65 W.

The Core 5 130HL lists 12 cores and 16 threads. The Core 9 273PE lists 12 cores and 24 threads. Cache sizes match for L1 and L2 (80 KB per core and 2 MB per core, respectively), but the L3 cache is 18 MB on the Core 5 130HL and 36 MB on the Core 9 273PE.

Memory bandwidth is recorded only for the Core 9 273PE at 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory support is false on the Core 5 130HL and true on the Core 9 273PE. PCIe is Gen 4 with 8 lanes on the Core 5 130HL, and Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the Core 9 273PE.

Integrated graphics differ: Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on the Core 5 130HL, and UHD Graphics 730 on the Core 9 273PE. The architectures differ as well, with Raptor Lake (Raptor Lake-PS) on the Core 5 130HL and Bartlett Lake on the Core 9 273PE. The Core 9 273PE has a launch MSRP of $549, a part number of SA4QD, and a release date in March 2026, while the Core 5 130HL has no launch MSRP and an April 2024 release date. Both processors share the Intel Socket 1700, a 10 nm process node, dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support, and an active production status. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.