Intel Core 5 130HL vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

The Intel Core 5 130HL and Intel Core 5 213PTE are both 45 W desktop processors on Intel Socket 1700, built on Intel's 10 nm process, but the database treats them very differently. The 213PTE has a full set of recorded Cinebench and Passmark results, an average benchmark score of 32924, and an 83rd percentile rank. The 130HL has no recorded benchmark results, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile rank. That asymmetry shapes every comparison below.

Where Each One Wins

With no recorded benchmarks for the 130HL, the database cannot assign any workload wins to it. The win totals for the direct comparison are zero for both processors. For the 213PTE, the recorded scores show where its strengths lie. Its Passmark data compression score of 261083 is the largest single recorded value, and its integer math score of 93109 is also high. Floating point math reaches 71722, multithread reaches 25590, and single thread reaches 3718. In Cinebench R23, the 213PTE records 21751 multi-core and 3070 single-core. Those results indicate a processor with strong throughput in compression, integer, and floating point workloads, along with balanced single-thread and multi-thread performance. The 130HL, by contrast, has no measured scores to support a use-case split. The 213PTE's 83rd percentile rank places it above the 130HL's 50th percentile in the database distribution, but that gap rests entirely on the 213PTE having recorded data.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are listed as Intel 10 nm parts from Intel's own foundry, and both use Socket 1700 with a 45 W TDP. They belong to different product lines: the 130HL is listed as Raptor Lake with the codename Raptor Lake-PS, while the 213PTE is listed under the codename Bartlett Lake with no separate architecture designation. The generation labels are Core 5 (Raptor Lake-PS) and Core 5 (Bartlett Lake).

The core counts differ: the 130HL has 12 cores and 16 threads, while the 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The 130HL reaches the same thread count with more physical cores. The 130HL has the higher base clock at 2.60, while the 213PTE has the higher boost clock at 5.20 versus 4.80. Cache organization is identical at the first two levels, with 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core. The shared L3 cache favors the 213PTE at 24 MB, compared with 18 MB for the 130HL.

Both support DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel memory bus. The 213PTE lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the 130HL does not specify a bandwidth figure. The 213PTE also lists ECC memory support as true, while the 130HL lists it as false. The PCIe interface is another differentiator: the 213PTE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while the 130HL provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well, with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on the 130HL and UHD Graphics 730 on the 213PTE. The 130HL is dated 2024-04-07, while the 213PTE is dated 2026-03-08. Both are active desktop parts with locked multipliers. In short, the 130HL pairs a higher core count and base clock with an older platform feature set; the 213PTE counters with a higher boost clock, larger L3 cache, ECC support, and PCIe Gen 5.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database has no direct head-to-head benchmark results pairing the 130HL against the 213PTE. The recorded data therefore cannot show a head-to-head win for either processor. What the database does contain is a full benchmark set for the 213PTE. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2192 multi-core and 309 single-core. In R20, those numbers rise to 9135 multi-core and 1289 single-core. In R23, the 213PTE records 21751 multi-core and 3070 single-core. The R23 multi-core score is the highest Cinebench result in its recorded set.

The Passmark results cover a wider range of workloads. Single thread is 3718 and multithread is 25590. Integer math reaches 93109, floating point math reaches 71722, extended instructions reach 16146, and data encryption reaches 14413. Data compression is particularly strong at 261083, while random string sorting is 30106, physics is 2199, and find prime numbers is 157. The data compression score is the largest single recorded value across all benchmarks.

The 213PTE's average benchmark score is 32924, placing it at the 83rd percentile. Its nearest rivals in the database are all close: the Core i7-12700 averages 32942, the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H averages 32812, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D averages 33079, and the Ryzen 7 8700G averages 33089. The recorded deltas are 0.1% behind the Core i7-12700, 0.3% ahead of the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, and 0.5% behind both the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and the Ryzen 7 8700G. These are near-parity margins. Because the 130HL has no benchmark entries, its side of the head-to-head comparison is empty.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more physical cores?

A: The 130HL has 12 cores and 16 threads. The 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Does the 213PTE support ECC memory?

A: Yes. The 213PTE lists ECC memory support as true, while the 130HL lists it as false.

Q: What recorded benchmark results exist for the 130HL?

A: None. The 130HL has an empty benchmark list, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile rank.

Q: How does the 213PTE compare with its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score is 32924. The database places it 0.1% behind the Core i7-12700's 32942, 0.3% ahead of the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H's 32812, and 0.5% behind both the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 33079 and the Ryzen 7 8700G's 33089.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The 213PTE has a boost clock of 5.20, compared with 4.80 for the 130HL.

Q: Which processor has more shared L3 cache?

A: The 213PTE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the 130HL has 18 MB.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 130HL | Intel Core 5 213PTE |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | not specified |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-PS | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Core 5 (Raptor Lake-PS) | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) |

| Cores | 12 | 8 |

| Base clock | 2.60 | 2.10 |

| Boost clock | 4.80 | 5.20 |

| L3 cache | 18 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory bandwidth | not specified | 76.8 GB/s |

| ECC memory | false | true |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Release date | 2024-04-07 | 2026-03-08 |

| Part number | unknown | SA4QM |

| Launch MSRP | not specified | $221 |

| Average benchmark score | 0 | 32924 |

| Percentile | 50 | 83 |

Specifications not listed are identical: Socket 1700, 45 W TDP, 10 nm process, Intel foundry, 16 threads, 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, DDR4 and DDR5 support, dual-channel memory bus, desktop market segment, active production status, and locked multipliers.