Intel Core 5 120HL vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Core 5 120HL, as its benchmark array is empty. This means the Core Ultra 5 336H carries the full weight of recorded performance data, and its scores provide the only measurable baseline for comparison. The Core Ultra 5 336H posts an average benchmark score of 34485, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Core 5 120HL, by contrast, holds a 50th percentile ranking with an average benchmark score of zero, indicating that no performance data has been recorded for it.

The Core Ultra 5 336H delivers strong multi-threaded results across Cinebench tests. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score reaches 23991, while the single-core score sits at 3387. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 10076, and the single-core score is 1422. The R15 tests show 2418 for multi-core and 341 for single-core. These figures indicate a processor that scales well under parallel workloads, with multi-core scores roughly seven times higher than single-core scores in each Cinebench version.

PassMark results for the Core Ultra 5 336H reveal specific strengths in different workload types. The data compression score of 280340 is notably high, while data encryption reaches 21291. Extended instructions score 24542, and find prime numbers returns 299. Floating point math hits 82415, and integer math reaches 62070. The multithread score is 28545, physics scores 2682, and random string sorting achieves 34402. The single-thread PassMark score is 4013, which appears twice in the recorded data under slightly different test names.

Comparing the Core Ultra 5 336H to its nearest rivals shows a tightly contested field. It trails the Intel Core i7-13700HX by 0.2 percent in average score, with the rival posting 34554 against its 34485. It leads the Intel Core i5-13450HX by 0.4 percent, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X by 0.7 percent, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 by 0.8 percent. These deltas are small, placing the Core Ultra 5 336H in a performance band where minor differences separate the top contenders. The data suggests that the Core Ultra 5 336H is competitive with these established processors, though it does not dominate any of them decisively.

The absence of benchmark results for the Core 5 120HL means no head-to-head wins can be assigned to either processor. The wins counter shows zero for both items, reflecting this lack of direct comparison data. Any assessment of relative performance must rely solely on the Core Ultra 5 336H's recorded scores and its position among rivals, while the Core 5 120HL remains an unmeasured entity in the database.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H?

A: The Core Ultra 5 336H records an average benchmark score of 34485, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 336H compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700HX?

A: The Core Ultra 5 336H trails the Core i7-13700HX by 0.2 percent in average score. The rival posts 34554, while the Core Ultra 5 336H posts 34485.

Q: What is the best multi-core Cinebench result for the Core Ultra 5 336H?

A: The highest multi-core score appears in Cinebench R23, where the Core Ultra 5 336H reaches 23991. Cinebench R20 shows 10076, and R15 shows 2418.

Q: Does the Core 5 120HL have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The Core 5 120HL has an empty benchmark array, with an average benchmark score of zero and a 50th percentile ranking.

Q: Which processor has more cores, and what does that suggest?

A: The Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores, while the Core 5 120HL has 12 cores. Both have 16 threads, so the Core Ultra 5 336H likely handles multi-threaded workloads with more physical cores available.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth figure for the Core Ultra 5 336H?

A: The Core Ultra 5 336H records a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, supported by dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel architectures and manufacturing nodes. The Core 5 120HL uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS codename, built on Intel's 10 nm process. The Core Ultra 5 336H uses Panther Lake architecture with the Panther Lake-H codename, built on a 3 nm process. This node difference suggests the Core Ultra 5 336H should offer better power efficiency and transistor density, though no transistor count or die size data exists in the database to confirm this.

Cache structures differ significantly between the two. The Core 5 120HL has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 336H has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and also 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 336H therefore provides more L1 and L2 cache per core, which can reduce latency for frequently accessed data, while both share the same total L3 capacity.

The integrated graphics solutions differ as well. The Core 5 120HL pairs with Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units, while the Core Ultra 5 336H uses Intel Xe3 Graphics. The Xe3 name indicates a newer generation of graphics architecture, though no execution unit count or performance numbers appear in the database for either solution.

PCIe support shows a generational jump. The Core 5 120HL offers PCIe Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes, while the Core Ultra 5 336H provides PCIe Gen 5 with 12 CPU lanes. This gives the Core Ultra 5 336H both newer and more available lanes for expansion devices, which matters for storage and GPU connectivity in mobile systems.

The memory support also reflects the architectural split. The Core 5 120HL supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 5 336H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The latter drops legacy DDR4 support in favor of low-power mobile memory, consistent with its mobile market segment. The Core Ultra 5 336H additionally records a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, a figure absent for the Core 5 120HL.

Socket and form factor differences separate the two physically. The Core 5 120HL uses Intel Socket 1700 and targets the desktop segment, while the Core Ultra 5 336H uses Intel BGA 2540 and targets mobile. This means the Core 5 120HL installs into a replaceable socket, whereas the Core Ultra 5 336H is soldered to the board, a standard approach for laptop processors.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ: the Core 5 120HL has 12 cores and 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads. This means the Core Ultra 5 336H uses no hyper-threading on some cores, achieving its thread count through additional physical cores instead.

Clock speeds show different profiles. The Core 5 120HL has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The Core Ultra 5 336H has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Core 5 120HL starts higher and boosts slightly higher, but the Core Ultra 5 336H compensates with more cores.

Thermal design power differs substantially. The Core 5 120HL has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Core Ultra 5 336H has a TDP of 25 watts. This lower power envelope for the Core Ultra 5 336H aligns with its mobile positioning and suggests better efficiency per watt, though efficiency figures are not directly recorded.

Memory support diverges: the Core 5 120HL accepts DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 5 336H accepts DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The Core Ultra 5 336H has a recorded memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, while the Core 5 120HL has no bandwidth figure in the database.

PCIe capabilities differ: the Core 5 120HL offers Gen 4 with 8 lanes, and the Core Ultra 5 336H offers Gen 5 with 12 lanes. Integrated graphics differ as noted, with the Core 5 120HL using Iris Xe Graphics 80EU and the Core Ultra 5 336H using Intel Xe3 Graphics.

Socket types differ: Intel Socket 1700 for the Core 5 120HL versus Intel BGA 2540 for the Core Ultra 5 336H. Market segments differ as well, with the Core 5 120HL listed as Desktop and the Core Ultra 5 336H as Mobile.

Release dates are recorded for both. The Core 5 120HL released on 2024-04-07, and the Core Ultra 5 336H released on 2026-01-04. The launch MSRP of $279 applies only to the Core 5 120HL; the Core Ultra 5 336H has no launch MSRP recorded.

The architecture, codename, and generation fields all differ. The Core 5 120HL lists Raptor Lake with codename Raptor Lake-PS and generation "Core 5 (Raptor Lake-PS)." The Core Ultra 5 336H lists Panther Lake with codename Panther Lake and generation "Ultra 5 (Panther Lake-H)." The process node differs at 10 nm versus 3 nm. Part numbers also differ: SRPFR for the Core 5 120HL and SA4RD for the Core Ultra 5 336H.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents an uneven comparison. The Core Ultra 5 336H has extensive benchmark coverage and a clear performance profile, while the Core 5 120HL has no measured results. For users who rely on database scores to guide processor selection, the Core Ultra 5 336H is the only option with verified performance data. Its 84th percentile ranking and average score of 34485 place it well above the 50th percentile position of the Core 5 120HL, though that percentile ranking for the latter reflects the absence of data rather than actual measured performance.

The Core Ultra 5 336H's scores position it competitively against known rivals. It sits within one percent of the Core i7-13700HX, Core i5-13450HX, Ryzen 7 3700X, and Ryzen AI 7 350, making it a viable choice in that performance tier. The small deltas, ranging from negative 0.2 percent to positive 0.8 percent, suggest that the Core Ultra 5 336H neither leads nor lags its closest competitors by a meaningful margin.

The Core 5 120HL cannot be evaluated on performance grounds without benchmark data. Its specification sheet shows a desktop processor with a higher base clock, higher boost clock, and higher TDP than the Core Ultra 5 336H. These specifications alone do not translate into measured performance, so any claim of superiority would lack database support.

For desktop builders who require a socketed processor, the Core 5 120HL is the only choice between the two, as the Core Ultra 5 336H uses a BGA socket that cannot be installed into a standard desktop motherboard. For mobile users, the Core Ultra 5 336H is the only option, given its mobile market segment and BGA 2540 socket. The data does not support a performance verdict for the Core 5 120HL, so the Core Ultra 5 336H stands as the only processor with validated results.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 5 336H wins in every category where measured data exists. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23991, R20 score of 10076, and R15 score of 2418 all demonstrate strong multi-threaded performance. PassMark tests show particular strength in data compression at 280340 and floating point math at 82415, indicating solid computational throughput for scientific and data-heavy tasks. The single-thread PassMark score of 4013 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3387 show capable single-thread performance as well.

The Core Ultra 5 336H also wins on architectural modernity. Its 3 nm process node, 16 cores, larger per-core L1 and L2 caches, PCIe Gen 5 support, and DDR5/LPDDR5X memory support all represent newer technology than the Core 5 120HL's 10 nm node, 12 cores, smaller per-core caches, PCIe Gen 4, and DDR4/DDR5 memory support. The 25 watt TDP also gives it an efficiency advantage on paper, though no power consumption measurements exist in the database.

The Core 5 120HL wins only in areas without performance data. Its higher base clock of 2.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz exceed the Core Ultra 5 336H's 1.90 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost. Its desktop socket and market segment make it suitable for systems where replaceable processors are required. Its earlier release date of 2024-04-07 and launch MSRP of $279 provide historical context, but neither indicates a performance advantage.

For workloads that benefit from many physical cores, low power draw, and recent architecture, the Core Ultra 5 336H is the clear choice based on its recorded data. For workloads that require a socketed desktop processor with higher clock speeds, the Core 5 120HL offers those specifications, but without benchmark scores, its actual performance remains unknown in the database. The data favors the Core Ultra 5 336H for any user who prioritizes verified performance over unmeasured specifications.