Intel Core 3 N350 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains complete benchmark results for the Intel Core 3 N350, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has no measured scores listed. This means a direct numerical comparison across identical tests is not possible from the available data. The Intel part posts an average benchmark score of 9903, placing it in the 66th percentile of all CPUs tracked. The Snapdragon X2E-94-100 carries a 50th percentile ranking, but with an average benchmark score of zero, the percentile figure reflects a placeholder rather than verified performance.

Looking at the Intel Core 3 N350’s individual results, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 6274 and single-core score of 885 show a substantial gap between threaded and single-threaded workloads. The R20 scores follow a similar pattern: 2635 multicore and 371 single-core. Older R15 results show 632 multicore and 89 single-core. PassMark tests add more texture. Integer math scores 27669, floating point math scores 17781, and data compression reaches 80444. Data encryption posts 5693, extended instructions 3981, and random string sorting 10102. The multithread score is 7382, single-thread is 1974, and physics is 446. Prime number finding is notably low at 20.

The nearest rivals in the database for the Intel chip are the Intel Core i7-3770 with an average score of 9706, the Intel Core i5-1035G1 at 9684, the AMD EPYC 7F52 at 10159, and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 at 10230. The delta percentages show the Core 3 N350 is 2% ahead of the Core i7-3770, 2.3% ahead of the Core i5-1035G1, 2.5% behind the EPYC 7F52, and 3.2% behind the Xeon Platinum 8280. These are modest margins, indicating the N350 sits in a competitive band with older desktop and mobile parts, despite being a low-power mobile chip.

For the Snapdragon X2E-94-100, no benchmark entries exist in the database. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the wins counters for both items are zero. Any statement about comparative performance would require fabricated numbers, which the data does not support. The only measurable distinctions are architectural and memory-related, not performance-based.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 3 N350 demonstrates clear strengths in the recorded benchmarks. Its PassMark data compression score of 80444 is the highest single result among its listed tests, suggesting strong throughput in compression workloads. Integer math at 27669 and floating point math at 17781 both indicate competent general-purpose number crunching. The multithread score of 7382 aligns with its 8-core, 8-thread configuration. Single-thread performance at 1974 in PassMark and 885 in Cinebench R23 shows a capable design for lightly threaded tasks, though not exceptional.

The Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has no recorded wins in the database. With zero benchmark scores, the data cannot assign it any workload victories. Its 18 cores and 18 threads suggest potential for heavily parallel tasks, but the absence of measurements means no empirical confirmation exists. The processor’s triple-channel memory bus and 228.6 GB/s memory bandwidth point toward memory-intensive workloads as a theoretical advantage, but again, no test data supports this.

The Intel chip’s 66th percentile ranking versus the Snapdragon’s 50th percentile is the only comparative metric available. However, the Snapdragon’s percentile is based on zero scores, so it carries no analytical weight. The Intel part’s percentile reflects actual measured results across multiple test suites. In the database, the Intel Core 3 N350 wins by default in every measurable category simply because it has data recorded.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 3 N350 uses the Twin Lake architecture, part of the Core 3 generation derived from Alder Lake-N. It is built on a 10 nm process by Intel. The die contains 8 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 0.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz. Thermal design power is 7 watts. The cache hierarchy includes 96 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of shared L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. Memory support covers DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5, running on a single-channel bus with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth. PCIe connectivity is Gen 3 with 9 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770. The socket is Intel BGA 1264. It launched on 2025-01-06 and remains in active production.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 uses the Glymur codename, part of the Snapdragon X2 (Elite) generation. It is built on a 3 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 220 mm². The chip has 18 cores and 18 threads, with a base clock of 4.45 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. Thermal design power is not listed in the database. Cache includes 288 KB of L1 per core, 16 MB of L2 per module, and 9 MB of shared L3. Memory support is LPDDR5X only, on a triple-channel bus delivering 228.6 GB/s bandwidth. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 12 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are Adreno X2-90. The socket is Qualcomm BGA 2343. It launched on 2026-04-05 and is in active production.

The core count difference is substantial: 18 versus 8. The clock speeds also differ significantly, with the Snapdragon’s base clock of 4.45 GHz far exceeding the Intel’s 0.10 GHz base, though the Intel boost of 3.90 GHz is closer to the Snapdragon’s 4.70 GHz boost. The process node advantage goes to Qualcomm at 3 nm versus 10 nm. Cache capacities are larger on the Snapdragon in L1 and L2, but the Intel chip has 6 MB of shared L3 versus 9 MB on the Snapdragon. Memory bandwidth favors Qualcomm heavily at 228.6 GB/s versus 38.4 GB/s, due to triple-channel versus single-channel architecture. PCIe generation also favors Qualcomm at Gen 5 versus Gen 3. The Intel part supports multiple memory types including DDR4 and DDR5, while the Snapdragon only supports LPDDR5X.

FAQ

Q: What is the core count difference between the Intel Core 3 N350 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100?

A: The Intel Core 3 N350 has 8 cores and 8 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has 18 cores and 18 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, compared to the Intel Core 3 N350’s boost clock of 3.90 GHz.

Q: How do their cache configurations differ?

A: The Intel Core 3 N350 has 96 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of shared L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 has 288 KB of L1 per core, 16 MB of L2 per module, and 9 MB of shared L3.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core 3 N350 supports 38.4 GB/s over a single-channel memory bus. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 supports 228.6 GB/s over a triple-channel memory bus.

Q: Which processor has a smaller manufacturing process node?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 is built on a 3 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel Core 3 N350 is built on a 10 nm process by Intel.

Q: Are benchmark scores available for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100?

A: No benchmark scores are recorded for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100 in the database. The Intel Core 3 N350 has scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and multiple PassMark tests.

The Verdict

The database contains complete performance measurements for the Intel Core 3 N350 and none for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-94-100. Users selecting based on recorded data must choose the Intel part, as it is the only one with verified benchmark results. The Intel chip’s 66th percentile ranking places it above half of all tracked CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 9903. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-3770, Intel Core i5-1035G1, AMD EPYC 7F52, and Intel Xeon Platinum 8280, with performance deltas ranging from 2.3% ahead to 3.2% behind. This positions the N350 as a competitive mobile processor for its class.

The Snapdragon X2E-94-100 cannot be evaluated on performance grounds from this data. Its architectural specifications suggest a different class of hardware: 18 cores, 4.45 GHz base clock, 3 nm process, 228.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, and Gen 5 PCIe. These features indicate a design aimed at high-end mobile or laptop computing, but the lack of benchmark data means no empirical comparison is possible. The 50th percentile ranking without any scores is not a meaningful metric.

For workloads where measured performance matters, the Intel Core 3 N350 is the only option with supporting evidence. For users who prioritize the Snapdragon’s architectural advantages, such as the larger core count or higher memory bandwidth, those characteristics remain unverified in practice. The verdict from the database is straightforward: the Intel part has data, the Qualcomm part does not. Until benchmark scores for the Snapdragon X2E-94-100 are recorded, the Intel Core 3 N350 stands as the benchmark-verified choice.