Intel Core 3 N350 vs Intel Core 5 223PQE Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The data available for these two processors takes sharply different forms. The Intel Core 3 N350 has a full suite of recorded benchmark results across Cinebench and PassMark tests, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has no benchmark entries in the database at all. This creates an unusual comparison: one chip is fully characterized by measurements, the other is defined entirely by its specifications and market positioning.

Based on the recorded data, the Core 3 N350 demonstrates its strengths in sustained multi-threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 6274 points and R20 multicore score of 2635 points show a processor that can handle parallel tasks with reasonable competence for its power class. The PassMark multithread score of 7382 reinforces this picture, with integer math at 27669 and floating point math at 17781 indicating balanced arithmetic capability across both integer and floating-point workloads.

The Core 3 N350 also shows particular aptitude in data compression and encryption tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 80444 is notably strong, and data encryption at 5693 points confirms that the chip handles cryptographic workloads without significant bottlenecks. Random string sorting at 10102 points adds another data manipulation strength to the profile.

The Core 5 223PQE, by contrast, has no recorded wins because the database contains no benchmark scores for it. Its case rests on architectural specifications: 8 cores, 16 threads, a 4.00 GHz base clock, and a 5.50 GHz boost clock. These figures, combined with a 24 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support, position it as a desktop-oriented part with substantial throughput potential, but the absence of measured results means any performance claims remain unverified by the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel families with distinctly different design goals. The Core 3 N350 uses the Twin Lake architecture under the Alder Lake-N generation umbrella, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. It features 8 cores and 8 threads, meaning no simultaneous multithreading. The L1 cache is 96 KB per core, L2 is 2 MB shared, and L3 is 6 MB shared. The base clock sits at 0.10 GHz with a boost clock of 3.90 GHz.

The Core 5 223PQE belongs to the Bartlett Lake generation, also on a 10 nm process from Intel. It provides 8 cores and 16 threads, enabling two threads per core. Cache organization differs substantially: L1 is 80 KB per core, L2 is 2 MB per core (rather than shared), and L3 expands to 24 MB shared. Clock speeds are far more aggressive at 4.00 GHz base and 5.50 GHz boost.

Power and platform targets diverge sharply. The Core 3 N350 carries a 7 W TDP, uses the Intel BGA 1264 socket, and supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 memory through a single-channel memory bus with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth. It is classified as a mobile segment part. The Core 5 223PQE has a 125 W TDP, fits the Intel Socket 1700, supports DDR4 and DDR5 through a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and is a desktop segment part. The Core 5 also supports ECC memory, while the Core 3 does not.

PCIe connectivity shows a similar gap. The Core 3 N350 provides PCIe Gen 3 with 9 lanes, while the Core 5 223PQE delivers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Both integrate UHD Graphics 770 as the iGPU. The Core 5 223PQE has a launch MSRP of $319; the Core 3 N350 has no recorded launch MSRP. The Core 3 N350 released on 2025-01-06, while the Core 5 223PQE has a release date of 2026-03-08. Both parts are currently listed as Active in production status, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark field in the database is empty, and the Core 5 223PQE has no individual benchmark scores recorded. This means a direct comparison of measured results is impossible. The only quantitative performance context comes from the Core 3 N350's scores and its position relative to other processors in the database.

The Core 3 N350 ranks at the 66th percentile among all CPUs tracked by the database, with an average benchmark score of 9903. Its nearest rivals provide useful reference points. The Intel Core i7-3770 scores an average of 9706, which is 2% lower than the N350. The Intel Core i5-1035G1 averages 9684, also 2.3% lower. Two server-class parts sit just above it: the AMD EPYC 7F52 averages 10159, which is 2.5% higher, and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 averages 10230, which is 3.2% higher. This places the N350 in a competitive band between older desktop i7 parts and enterprise server silicon, which is notable for a 7 W mobile chip.

The Core 5 223PQE has no average benchmark score, no percentile beyond its 50th percentile ranking, and no rival list. Its specifications suggest it would outperform the N350 in most multi-threaded scenarios given the doubled thread count, much higher clocks, larger cache, and dual-channel memory. But the database cannot confirm this with measurements. The N350's single-core results, such as 885 in Cinebench R23 and 1974 in PassMark single-thread, come from a 3.90 GHz boost clock. The Core 5 223PQE's 5.50 GHz ceiling implies a significant single-thread advantage, but again, no recorded score exists to verify the magnitude.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has 16 threads across 8 cores, while the Intel Core 3 N350 has 8 threads across 8 cores.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Core 3 N350 has a 7 W TDP, while the Core 5 223PQE has a 125 W TDP.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Core 5 223PQE supports ECC memory, but the Core 3 N350 does not.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Core 5 223PQE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, compared to 6 MB of shared L3 cache on the Core 3 N350.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each processor support?

A: The Core 3 N350 has a single-channel memory bus with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth, while the Core 5 223PQE has a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the database contain benchmark scores for the Core 5 223PQE?

A: No. The Core 5 223PQE has no recorded benchmark scores, while the Core 3 N350 has a full set of Cinebench and PassMark results.

Q: What is the release timeline for these processors?

A: The Core 3 N350 has a release date of 2025-01-06, and the Core 5 223PQE has a release date of 2026-03-08.

The Verdict

The database presents a lopsided comparison. The Core 3 N350 is fully measured and sits at the 66th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 9903. Its nearest rivals cluster within a few percentage points: the Core i7-3770 trails by 2%, the Core i5-1035G1 trails by 2.3%, the EPYC 7F52 leads by 2.5%, and the Xeon Platinum 8280 leads by 3.2%. For a 7 W mobile processor, this is a strong showing in the recorded data.

The Core 5 223PQE cannot be evaluated on measured performance because none exists in the database. Its specifications describe a desktop processor with a 125 W TDP, 16 threads, a 5.50 GHz boost clock, 24 MB of L3 cache, dual-channel memory at 89.6 GB/s, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity. These figures point to a part designed for substantially higher throughput than the N350, particularly in multi-threaded and memory-bandwidth-sensitive workloads. The 50th percentile ranking and zero average score indicate a lack of data rather than a lack of capability.

Buyers selecting between these two parts should base the decision on platform requirements. The Core 3 N350 suits compact, low-power mobile designs with its BGA 1264 socket and 7 W TDP. The Core 5 223PQE targets desktop builds on Socket 1700 with high power delivery and expansion options. The recorded data validates the N350 as a capable performer within its class. The Core 5 223PQE remains an unquantified quantity in the database, defined only by its specifications and a launch MSRP of $319.