Intel Core 3 305 vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core 3 305 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What is the base clock speed for each chip?

A: The Intel Core 3 305 runs at a base clock of 1.50 GHz. The Intel Processor 300T runs at a base clock of 3.40 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 305 have a boost clock?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 3 305 boosts up to 4.30 GHz. The Intel Processor 300T has no listed boost clock in the recorded data.

Q: Which processor supports DDR4 memory?

A: The Intel Processor 300T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Intel Core 3 305 supports only DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The Intel Core 3 305 is fabricated on a 3 nm node. The Intel Processor 300T uses a 10 nm node.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 3 305 has an average benchmark score of 18302 and sits at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Processor 300T has no recorded average benchmark score in the database and sits at the 50th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 3 305 and Intel Processor 300T represent two distinctly different design generations within Intel's lineup. The Core 3 305 is built on Wildcat Lake architecture and manufactured on a 3 nm process node, while the Processor 300T is a Raptor Lake-S part fabricated on a 10 nm node. This process gap directly influences transistor density, power characteristics, and achievable clock behavior.

The core configuration differs sharply. The Core 3 305 packs 6 cores with 6 threads, all running at a base clock of 1.50 GHz with a boost of 4.30 GHz. The Processor 300T offers only 2 cores with 4 threads, thanks to Hyper-Threading support, and operates at a fixed base clock of 3.40 GHz with no boost clock listed. The higher base frequency of the Processor 300T compensates partially for its lower core count in single-threaded workloads, but the Core 3 305's boost capability gives it a wider frequency envelope.

Cache hierarchies diverge as well. The Core 3 305 provides 192 KB of L1 cache, 2.5 MB of L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Processor 300T reports 80 KB of L1 per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, also with 6 MB of shared L3. The per-core L2 allocation on the Processor 300T is substantial relative to its core count, while the Core 3 305 spreads a smaller per-core L2 across more cores.

Memory support separates the two further. The Core 3 305 runs single-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X with a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The Processor 300T supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5, though no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. The Processor 300T also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, whereas the Core 3 305 uses PCIe Gen 4 with only 6 lanes. This makes the Processor 300T a more expansion-friendly desktop part, while the Core 3 305 appears tailored for compact mobile systems.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 3 305 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core. The Processor 300T uses UHD Graphics 710. The Core 3 305 is classified as a mobile segment processor, while the Processor 300T is a desktop part. Both are active production parts, but the Core 3 305 was released later, with a launch MSRP of $309, whereas the Processor 300T launched with a launch MSRP of $82.

The die size is recorded only for the Processor 300T at 163 mm². The Core 3 305 has no die size listed in the database. Both processors have locked multipliers, and neither supports ECC memory.

The Verdict

The benchmark data strongly favors the Intel Core 3 305. Its average benchmark score of 18302 places it at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Processor 300T sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores. The Core 3 305's nearest rival, the Intel Core i3-14100, scores 18318, a delta of only -0.1%, meaning the Core 3 305 effectively matches that chip. The Processor 300T has no nearest rivals listed, so its competitive position cannot be quantified against specific models.

Users who need multi-threaded throughput should clearly choose the Core 3 305. Its 6 cores versus 2 cores creates a substantial advantage in parallel workloads. The Core 3 305 also benefits from a significantly newer process node, which typically enables better power efficiency for sustained loads. The Processor 300T, with its higher base clock, may hold an edge in lightly threaded tasks where frequency dominates, but the Core 3 305's boost clock of 4.30 GHz narrows that gap considerably.

For desktop builders needing PCIe Gen 5 and dual-channel memory, the Processor 300T offers architectural advantages that the Core 3 305 cannot match. However, for anyone prioritizing raw compute performance, the data indicates the Core 3 305 is the stronger processor by a wide margin.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 3 305 | Intel Processor 300T |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 2 |

| Threads | 6 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 1.50 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | Not listed |

| TDP | 15 W | 35 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1516 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Wildcat Lake | Raptor Lake |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 10 nm |

| Die Size | Not listed | 163 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 6 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Single-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 59.7 GB/s | Not listed |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 6 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Launch MSRP | $309 | $82 |

| Release Date | 2026-04-15 | 2024-01-07 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 3 305 has a full suite of benchmark scores recorded in the database, while the Intel Processor 300T has no benchmark entries at all. This makes a direct head-to-head comparison impossible from the recorded data. However, the Core 3 305's scores can be interpreted against its nearest rivals to establish its performance tier.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Core 3 305 scores 13123. Single-core performance in the same test reaches 1852. Cinebench R20 results show 5511 multi-core and 777 single-core. Cinebench R15 yields 1322 multi-core and 186 single-core. These results indicate a processor that scales well with its 6 cores, though the single-core scores are modest relative to the boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

PassMark results for the Core 3 305 include a multithread score of 15439 and a single-thread score of 3977. The data compression test scores 146857, while data encryption reaches 11019. Extended instructions score 13543, and floating point math hits 42284. Integer math scores 32295, and find prime numbers reaches 115. Random string sorting scores 17623, and physics scores 1233.

The average benchmark score of 18302 places the Core 3 305 within 0.1% of the Intel Core i3-14100, which scores 18318. It sits 0.2% behind the Intel Core 5 330 (18345) and 0.4% behind the Intel Core 7 360 (18374). The AMD Ryzen 5 2600E scores 18230, which puts the Core 3 305 0.4% ahead of that part. These narrow deltas suggest the Core 3 305 performs at the same level as a range of established processors from both Intel and AMD, despite its much smaller physical footprint and lower TDP.

Because the Processor 300T has no recorded benchmarks, its performance can only be inferred from its specifications. The 2-core, 4-thread configuration with a 3.40 GHz base clock suggests competitive single-threaded throughput, but the absence of a boost clock and the older 10 nm node limit its ceiling.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 3 305 wins decisively in any workload that benefits from multiple cores. Its 6 cores provide 3 times the physical core count of the Processor 300T. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13123 demonstrates strong parallel scaling, and the PassMark multithread score of 15439 confirms this pattern. The Core 3 305 also wins on process efficiency, with a 3 nm node versus 10 nm, and a TDP of 15 W versus 35 W. This makes it the preferred choice for thermally constrained mobile systems where sustained multi-threaded performance is needed.

The Intel Processor 300T wins in scenarios where raw clock speed matters more than core count. Its base clock of 3.40 GHz is more than double the Core 3 305's base clock of 1.50 GHz. For single-threaded tasks that cannot utilize multiple cores, the Processor 300T may deliver snappier response times, though the Core 3 305's 4.30 GHz boost clock partially mitigates this advantage. The Processor 300T also wins on platform connectivity, offering PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes versus Gen 4 with 6 lanes, and dual-channel memory support versus single-channel. Desktop builders who need expansion slots, high-bandwidth storage, or wide memory buses will prefer the Processor 300T.

The Processor 300T also carries a much lower launch MSRP of $82 versus $309 for the Core 3 305, which may matter for cost-sensitive system builders, though pricing analysis is outside the scope of this data. The Processor 300T's release date of 2024-01-07 makes it a more mature platform with established motherboard support, while the Core 3 305's 2026 release date is newer. The Processor 300T uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is widely available in desktop motherboards, whereas the Core 3 305 uses Intel BGA 1516, a soldered mobile socket.

For users who need a compact, efficient processor with strong multi-threaded performance, the data points to the Core 3 305. For desktop users who prioritize platform features like PCIe Gen 5, dual-channel memory, and a higher base clock, the Processor 300T holds clear advantages. The benchmark gap, however, is one-sided: every recorded performance score belongs to the Core 3 305, and its percentile ranking of 72 versus 50 confirms that it occupies a higher performance tier overall.