Intel Core 3 305 vs Intel Core i5-110 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 3 305 and the Intel Core i5-110 occupy very different positions in the database. The Core 3 305 has a full benchmark record; the Core i5-110 has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a direct score-by-score comparison impossible. The data that exists, however, points to a decisive performance gap in favor of the Core 3 305.

The Core 3 305 posts an average benchmark score of 18302 across all recorded tests. Its percentileVsAllCpus of 72 means it outperforms 72% of all CPUs in the database. By contrast, the Core i5-110 has an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentileVsAllCpus of 50. The i5-110 sits exactly at the median position, but with no actual measurements behind that ranking, its practical performance cannot be verified from the recorded data.

The nearest rivals to the Core 3 305 help contextualize its standing. The Intel Core i3-14100 scores 18318, which places it 0.1% ahead of the Core 3 305. The Intel Core 5 330 scores 18345, 0.2% ahead. The Intel Core 7 360 scores 18374, 0.4% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 5 2600E scores 18230, which is 0.4% behind the Core 3 305. These deltas are small, all within a single percentage point. The Core 3 305 is effectively trading blows with that cluster of processors. The i5-110 has no nearest rivals listed, reinforcing the absence of comparable benchmark data.

Within the Core 3 305's own benchmark suite, multicore workloads show strong results. Cinebench R23 multicore returns 13123 points, while Cinebench R20 multicore returns 5511 and Cinebench R15 multicore returns 1322. Single-core results are lower but consistent: Cinebench R23 single-core scores 1852, R20 single-core scores 777, and R15 single-core scores 186. PassMark tests show integer math at 32295, floating point math at 42284, and extended instructions at 13543. Data compression scores 146857, while data encryption scores 11019. Multithreaded PassMark scores 15439, and single-thread scores 3977 in both recorded single-thread fields. Find prime numbers scores 115, random string sorting scores 17623, and physics scores 1233.

The absence of any head-to-head benchmark entries in the database means there are no measured wins for either processor against the other. The winsA and winsB fields are both 0. The only way to interpret the situation is through the Core 3 305's complete benchmark record and the i5-110's empty one. The data shows a processor with a robust performance profile on one side and a processor with no measurable output on the other.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design generations. The Intel Core 3 305 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and is built on a 3 nm process node, manufactured by Intel. The Intel Core i5-110 uses the Comet Lake architecture and codename, built on a 14 nm process node, also manufactured by Intel. The process node gap is substantial: 3 nm versus 14 nm. This alone explains much of the expected efficiency and density difference between the two parts.

Core counts match at 6 cores for both. Thread counts do not. The Core 3 305 has 6 threads, meaning no hyperthreading. The Core i5-110 has 12 threads, meaning each core handles two threads. This gives the i5-110 a theoretical multithreading advantage in workloads that scale with thread count, though the Core 3 305's newer architecture and higher efficiency may offset that in practice.

Cache configurations differ sharply. The Core 3 305 has 192 KB of L1, 2.5 MB of L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. The Core i5-110 has 64 KB of L1 per core and 256 KB of L2 per core, with 12 MB of shared L3. With six cores, the i5-110's L1 totals 384 KB and its L2 totals 1.5 MB. The Core 3 305 has less L1 and more L2 in absolute terms, but the i5-110 has twice the L3 capacity: 12 MB versus 6 MB.

Memory support diverges. The Core 3 305 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory through a single-channel bus, delivering 59.7 GB/s of bandwidth. The Core i5-110 supports DDR4 through a dual-channel bus, delivering 42.7 GB/s. The newer memory standard on the Core 3 305 provides higher bandwidth despite the single-channel limitation. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities also differ. The Core 3 305 offers PCIe Gen 4 with 6 lanes from the CPU. The Core i5-110 offers PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The i5-110 has more lanes, but the Core 3 305 has a newer generation standard.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Core 3 305 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core. The Core i5-110 uses UHD Graphics 630. The Xe3 architecture is substantially newer than the UHD 630 design.

Clock speeds show a mixed picture. The Core 3 305 has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Core i5-110 has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The i5-110 runs at a much higher base frequency, while both reach the same boost ceiling.

Power and socket targets place them in different markets. The Core 3 305 has a TDP of 15 watts and uses the Intel BGA 1516 socket, indicating a mobile-focused design. The Core i5-110 has a TDP of 65 watts and uses the Intel Socket 1200, indicating a desktop-focused design. The Core 3 305 is a mobile part; the Core i5-110 is a desktop part.

Release timing is notable. The Core 3 305 has a release date of 2026-04-15. The Core i5-110 has a release date of 2025-09-10. The i5-110 launched earlier, yet uses the older Comet Lake architecture, suggesting a legacy or budget desktop offering. The Core 3 305 launches later with a much newer process node and memory standard.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 3 305 has an average benchmark score of 18302. The Intel Core i5-110 has an average benchmark score of 0 because no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: Do both processors have the same number of cores?

A: Yes, both have 6 cores. They differ in threads: the Core 3 305 has 6 threads, while the Core i5-110 has 12 threads.

Q: Which processor uses a newer process node?

A: The Intel Core 3 305 is built on a 3 nm process. The Intel Core i5-110 is built on a 14 nm process.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Core 3 305 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Core i5-110 supports DDR4. The Core 3 305 also has higher memory bandwidth at 59.7 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s.

Q: Are these processors designed for the same market segment?

A: No. The Core 3 305 is a mobile processor with a 15 W TDP and Intel BGA 1516 socket. The Core i5-110 is a desktop processor with a 65 W TDP and Intel Socket 1200.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Core i5-110 has 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 3 305 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 3 305 | Intel Core i5-110 |

|----------------|-------------------|--------------------|

| Threads | 6 | 12 |

| Base clock | 1.50 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.30 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1516 | Intel Socket 1200 |

| Architecture | Wildcat Lake | Comet Lake |

| Codename | Wildcat Lake | Comet Lake |

| Process node | 3 nm | 14 nm |

| L1 cache | 192 KB | 64 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 256 KB per core |

| L3 cache | 6 MB shared | 12 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4 |

| Memory bus | Single-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 59.7 GB/s | 42.7 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 6 lanes | Gen 3, 16 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) | UHD Graphics 630 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2026-04-15 | 2025-09-10 |

| Launch MSRP | $309 | $200 |

| Average benchmark score | 18302 | 0 |

| Percentile vs all CPUs | 72 | 50 |

The Verdict

The recorded data supports one clear conclusion: the Intel Core 3 305 is the only processor in this comparison with measurable performance. Its average benchmark score of 18302 and 72nd percentile ranking place it among capable mobile processors. The Core i5-110 has no benchmark scores, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile that appears to be a default placeholder rather than a measured result.

The architectural gulf reinforces this. The Core 3 305 uses a 3 nm process and supports DDR5 memory with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. The Core i5-110 uses a 14 nm process and DDR4 memory with 42.7 GB/s bandwidth. The newer process node gives the Core 3 305 a massive efficiency and density advantage, despite its lower base clock of 1.50 GHz versus 2.90 GHz on the i5-110.

The Core i5-110 does hold advantages in specific raw specifications. It has 12 threads versus 6. It has 12 MB of L3 versus 6 MB. It has dual-channel memory versus single-channel. It has 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes versus 6 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. It also has a higher base clock. These specifications suggest the i5-110 could handle multithreaded desktop workloads well, but without any recorded benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm that potential.

The Core 3 305 also carries a higher launch MSRP of $309, while the Core i5-110 launches at $200. The Core 3 305 is a mobile part, however, and the i5-110 is a desktop part, so direct price comparison is limited by different market positioning.

For anyone relying on database measurements, the Core 3 305 is the verified performer. The i5-110 remains an unmeasured quantity. The Core 3 305's benchmark record, process node, and memory bandwidth make it the stronger documented choice. The i5-110's lack of data means it cannot be recommended on the basis of recorded performance.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 3 305 wins on every metric with recorded data. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13123 and single-core score of 1852 demonstrate solid performance in rendering and single-threaded applications. PassMark integer math at 32295 and floating point math at 42284 show strength in compute-heavy tasks. Data compression at 146857 and data encryption at 11019 indicate robust throughput in data processing workloads. Its 3 nm process, DDR5 memory support, and 59.7 GB/s bandwidth give it a clear efficiency and memory-speed advantage. The 15 W TDP makes it suitable for mobile designs where power draw matters.

The Intel Core i5-110 wins on paper specifications only. Its 12 threads give it a theoretical edge in heavily threaded workloads, and its 12 MB of L3 cache doubles the Core 3 305's 6 MB. Its 2.90 GHz base clock is nearly double the Core 3 305's 1.50 GHz, which could translate to better idle-to-load responsiveness in desktop use. Its dual-channel DDR4 memory bus, while slower in bandwidth at 42.7 GB/s, may offer lower latency in memory-sensitive applications. Its 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes provide more expansion capacity than the Core 3 305's 6 Gen 4 lanes. The 65 W TDP and Socket 1200 target desktop builds where power efficiency is less critical.

None of the i5-110's advantages are backed by benchmark scores in the database. The Core 3 305's wins are measured and recorded. The i5-110's wins are speculative, based on specification sheets alone. For users prioritizing verified performance, the Core 3 305 is the data-supported pick. For users who value thread count, cache size, and desktop expansion, the i5-110 offers those specifications, but without recorded evidence of how they perform in practice.