AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare between the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and the Intel Core 3 201TE?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201TE uses 4 cores and 8 threads. This gives the AMD part double the core count and double the thread count of the Intel part.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock speeds between the two processors?

A: Both processors share the same maximum boost clock of 4.60 GHz. However, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has a higher base clock at 3.80 GHz compared to the Intel Core 3 201TE's base clock of 2.90 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G does not. This is a notable distinction for systems requiring error-correcting memory.

Q: What are the thermal design power (TDP) ratings for these CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has a TDP of 65 watts. The Intel Core 3 201TE has a lower TDP of 45 watts, indicating the Intel part is designed for lower power consumption.

Q: How does the integrated graphics differ between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G integrates Radeon Vega 8 graphics. The Intel Core 3 201TE integrates UHD Graphics 730. Both provide on-die display output capabilities.

Q: What is the recorded average benchmark score for each processor in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has an average benchmark score of 49196 and sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 3 201TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average score of 0, placing it in the 50th percentile.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear performance hierarchy. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G delivers a substantial advantage in multi-threaded workloads, evidenced by its 8-core/16-thread configuration and robust benchmark scores across all recorded tests. Its average benchmark score of 49196 places it in the 90th percentile, directly competing with high-end desktop processors like the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and the Intel Core i5-14600KF. For users running heavily threaded applications such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is the clear choice based on the recorded data.

The Intel Core 3 201TE, with its 4-core/8-thread design, targets a different segment. Its lower TDP of 45 watts suggests a focus on efficiency and lower thermal output. The lack of benchmark data in the database means its performance profile is not quantified, but its specifications point to a more modest computing experience. The Intel part also brings advantages in platform features: it supports ECC memory and uses PCIe Gen 5, which are absent on the AMD platform. For builders prioritizing error-correcting memory or the latest PCIe connectivity, the Intel Core 3 201TE offers those specific capabilities, despite its lower core count.

The decision rests on workload priority. The database shows the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G as the overwhelmingly superior performer for CPU-intensive tasks. The Intel Core 3 201TE should be selected only when its specific feature set, namely ECC memory support, lower power draw, and PCIe Gen 5, outweighs the need for raw processing throughput.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct benchmark comparisons between the two CPUs are not available in the database; the head-to-head table is empty. However, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has a complete set of individual benchmark scores, allowing for a detailed analysis of its strengths. The Intel Core 3 201TE has no recorded scores, so the comparison relies on the AMD part's absolute performance figures and its standing relative to other CPUs.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G demonstrates its highest relative performance in the PassMark Integer Math test, scoring 90270. Its Floating Point Math score is 50778, and Data Encryption scores 19450. The Extended Instructions test yields a score of 20487, while Data Compression reaches 295730. For memory and sorting tasks, the Random String Sorting score is 32771. The multithread score is 23858, and the single-thread score is 3366. The Physics test shows a score of 1022, and the Find Prime Numbers test scores 58.

Given the Intel Core 3 201TE's 4-core/8-thread configuration, it would logically be positioned far below these figures in multi-threaded tests, as the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has double the cores and threads. The single-thread score of 3366 for the AMD part also represents a strong baseline, though the Intel part's boost clock of 4.60 GHz matches the AMD part, suggesting it could be competitive in lightly threaded workloads. However, without recorded data for the Intel chip, this remains speculative.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G's average score of 49196 places it 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-14600KF. It is 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and 1% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H. These deltas show the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G operating in the same performance tier as those high-end desktop and server processors, a remarkable position for an 8-core part.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G provides 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201TE provides 4 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks differ significantly: the AMD part runs at 3.80 GHz, the Intel part at 2.90 GHz. Both reach a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Thermal design power differs, with the AMD part rated at 65 watts and the Intel part at 45 watts. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket AM4, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. Cache configurations are distinct: the AMD part has 64 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, with 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB L1 and 1.25 MB L2 per core, with 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support diverges: the AMD chip supports DDR4 only, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is higher on the Intel part at 76.8 GB/s versus 51.2 GB/s for the AMD part. ECC memory is supported only on the Intel Core 3 201TE. The PCIe interface also differs: the AMD part uses Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes, a major generational leap. The integrated graphics differ as well: Radeon Vega 8 on the AMD side, UHD Graphics 730 on the Intel side. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $134, while the AMD part has no launch MSRP in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is built on the Zen 3 architecture with the codename Cezanne, representing the 5000 series. It uses a 7 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. This is a mature, high-efficiency design that has proven competitive in the desktop market.

The Intel Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, part of the Core 3 generation. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process node by Intel, with a die size of 163 mm². Intel's process node is less advanced than TSMC's 7 nm node used by AMD, but the architecture is newer, having been released on 2025-01-12, compared to the AMD part's release on 2024-09-04.

Architecturally, the AMD chip leverages the efficiency of Zen 3 with its unified 16 MB L3 cache, which is shared across all 8 cores. The Intel chip uses a smaller 12 MB shared L3 cache but compensates with a larger per-core L2 cache of 1.25 MB. The Intel architecture also brings support for DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5, which are significant platform upgrades over the AMD part's DDR4 and PCIe Gen 3 capabilities. The Intel part also includes ECC memory support, a feature typically associated with workstation or server reliability, and a lower TDP of 45 watts, suggesting a more power-efficient architecture design. The AMD part, while using an older process node, delivers higher core counts and clock speeds within its 65-watt envelope.