AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G vs Intel Core 3 201E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data shows a decisive overall advantage for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, which wins 8 of the 11 shared tests. The Intel Core 3 201E takes 3 wins, two of which are the same single-thread measurement reported under different test names. The margin of victory in AMD's wins is substantial, while Intel's wins are narrow.

The largest gap appears in passmark_integer_math. The AMD part scores 90270 against 43894 for the Intel chip, a difference of 105.7%. This means the AMD processor delivers more than double the integer throughput in this workload. Data encryption shows a 117.8% advantage for AMD, with scores of 19450 versus 8931. Extended instructions also favor AMD heavily: 20487 versus 11035, an 85.7% gap. Random string sorting goes to AMD by 84.3%, with scores of 32771 versus 17783. Data compression shows AMD at 295730 versus 164160, a 80.1% lead. Floating point math favors AMD by 52.7%, with 50778 against 33260. The multithread score, a broad measure of parallel performance, gives AMD 23858 versus 14839, a 60.8% advantage. Even the closest AMD win, find prime numbers, still goes to the Ryzen part: 58 versus 57, a 1.8% margin.

The Intel Core 3 201E claims the physics test with 1141 against AMD's 1022, a 10.4% lead. In the single-thread test, Intel scores 3482 versus 3366, a 3.3% advantage. The same single-thread result appears under both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread, so Intel's actual win count is two distinct workloads.

The average benchmark score amplifies this disparity. AMD's average is 49196, while Intel's average is 19056. That places the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G at the 90th percentile among all CPUs in the database, compared to the 73rd percentile for the Core 3 201E. In the nearest rival comparisons, the AMD part sits within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228) and 0.4% below the Intel Core i5-14600KF (49394). It edges the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995) by 0.4% and the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48698) by 1%. The Intel Core 3 201E, by contrast, matches the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (19047) at 0% delta, leads the Intel Core i5-12400F (19039) by 0.1%, the Intel Core i5-1335U (18982) by 0.4%, and the AMD EPYC 7773X (18979) by 0.4%. In other words, the AMD part competes with high-end desktop and server processors, while the Intel part sits in the mid-range segment.

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is in a different performance class. Its multithread score is roughly 60% higher, and its integer math result is more than double. These are not marginal differences; they reflect a fundamental gap in parallel processing capability.

The Verdict

The benchmark results point to a clear split: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is the stronger processor for multi-threaded and throughput-heavy workloads, while the Intel Core 3 201E holds a modest edge in single-threaded performance and physics simulation.

For users running workloads that scale across cores, the AMD part is the obvious choice. Its 8 cores and 16 threads give it a structural advantage over the Intel chip's 4 cores and 8 threads. The data confirms this: 60.8% higher multithread score, 105.7% higher integer math, 85.7% higher extended instructions, and 80.1% higher data compression. Content creation, compilation, data processing, and scientific computing would all benefit from this margin.

The Intel Core 3 201E wins only where raw per-core speed matters most. Its single-thread score of 3482 beats AMD's 3366 by 3.3%. Its physics score of 1141 beats AMD's 1022 by 10.4%. These are relevant for lightly threaded applications, older games that rely on one or two cores, and certain simulation workloads. However, the margins are small compared to AMD's leads.

The percentile data reinforces this. The AMD part sits at the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel part sits at the 73rd. The average benchmark score of 49196 for AMD versus 19056 for Intel means the AMD processor delivers roughly 2.6 times the average performance across the recorded tests. That is not a close contest.

From a platform perspective, the AMD part uses the AM4 socket, while the Intel part uses the LGA 1700 socket. The AMD chip is built on a 7 nm process from TSMC, while Intel uses its own 10 nm process. These architectural differences are examined below.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G uses the Zen 3 architecture with the codename Cezanne. It belongs to the 5000 series and is part of the Ryzen 7 generation. The chip is built on a 7 nm process at TSMC, with 10,700 million transistors on a die size of 180 mm².

The Intel Core 3 201E uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 3 generation. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The die size is 163 mm², and no transistor count is recorded in the database.

Cache organization differs substantially. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel's per-core L2 is larger, but AMD's aggregate L3 is larger. AMD's total L3 of 16 MB exceeds Intel's 12 MB by 4 MB.

Memory support also differs. The AMD processor supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with a recorded bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel part has higher theoretical memory bandwidth.

ECC memory support is present on the Intel chip but absent on the AMD chip. The database records eccMemory as true for Intel and false for AMD. This is relevant for workstation or server use cases where error-correcting memory is required.

PCIe capability differs as well. The AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This gives the Intel part a newer, faster interconnect for GPUs and NVMe storage.

Integrated graphics differ. AMD includes Radeon Vega 8, while Intel includes UHD Graphics 730. No benchmark scores for these iGPUs are recorded in the database, so a direct comparison is not possible from this data.

The process node difference is significant: 7 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. This affects transistor density and power characteristics, though the TDP figures are close: 65 watts for AMD and 60 watts for Intel.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several recorded specifications.

Core and thread counts: AMD has 8 cores and 16 threads. Intel has 4 cores and 8 threads. AMD has double the cores and double the threads.

Clock speeds: AMD has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Intel has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Intel has a higher boost clock by 0.20 GHz, but a lower base clock by 0.20 GHz.

TDP: AMD is rated at 65 watts. Intel is rated at 60 watts. Intel has a 5 watt lower TDP.

Socket: AMD uses AMD Socket AM4. Intel uses Intel Socket 1700.

Process node: AMD is on 7 nm from TSMC. Intel is on 10 nm from Intel's foundry.

Die size: AMD measures 180 mm². Intel measures 163 mm².

Transistor count: AMD records 10,700 million transistors. Intel has no recorded transistor count.

L1 cache per core: AMD has 64 KB. Intel has 80 KB.

L2 cache per core: AMD has 512 KB. Intel has 1.25 MB.

L3 cache: AMD has 16 MB. Intel has 12 MB shared.

Memory support: AMD supports DDR4 only. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Memory bandwidth: AMD records 51.2 GB/s. Intel records 76.8 GB/s.

ECC memory: AMD does not support it. Intel does.

PCIe version: AMD uses Gen 3. Intel uses Gen 5.

Integrated graphics: AMD uses Radeon Vega 8. Intel uses UHD Graphics 730.

Release date: AMD was released on 2024-09-04. Intel was released on 2025-01-12. Intel is roughly four months newer.

Launch MSRP: Intel lists a launch MSRP of $134. AMD has no recorded launch MSRP.

Multiplier unlocked: Both are locked. Neither chip supports an unlocked multiplier.

Market segment: Both are desktop processors.

Production status: Both are active.

Part numbers: AMD is 100-000001748. Intel is SRVTR.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the single-thread performance difference?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E scores 3482 in the passmark single-thread test, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 3366. Intel leads by 3.3%.

Q: Which processor is faster in multithreaded workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 23858 in the passmark multithread test, while the Intel Core 3 201E scores 14839. AMD leads by 60.8%.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 201E support ECC memory?

A: Yes. The database records eccMemory as true for the Intel Core 3 201E. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G does not support ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G supports DDR4 only. The Intel Core 3 201E supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G has an average benchmark score of 49196. The Intel Core 3 201E has an average benchmark score of 19056.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, which is 0.20 GHz higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G's boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: What PCIe generation does each processor use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core 3 201E uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.