Intel Core 3 100HL vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 Comparison

The Intel Core 3 100HL and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 are both 8-core processors, but they target different segments and exhibit contrasting performance profiles. The data shows the Intel part, with its higher boost clock and 12 threads, holds a significant advantage in multi-threaded workloads, while the Qualcomm chip, built on a more advanced process node, offers higher base clocks and a lower thermal envelope. This analysis breaks down the recorded specifications and benchmark results to determine where each processor excels.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core 3 100HL is the clear winner in multi-core performance scenarios. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14948 positions it well above the 50th percentile of all CPUs, landing at the 76th percentile. This strength extends to complex mathematical and data-intensive tasks, as shown by its Passmark integer math score of 56308 and floating point math score of 42108. The Intel chip also demonstrates superiority in single-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2110 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3735.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100, while lacking direct benchmark scores in the database, is defined by its efficiency-oriented specifications. Its 4 nm process node, produced by TSMC, contrasts with Intel's 10 nm node. The Snapdragon has a higher base clock of 3.40 GHz compared to Intel's 2.10 GHz, but a lower boost clock of 4.00 GHz versus Intel's 4.60 GHz. With a TDP of 30 W, it is designed for lower power consumption than the Intel part's 45 W rating. The Snapdragon's memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s with LPDDR5X support is a notable advantage for memory-intensive operations, but without benchmark scores, its actual performance wins cannot be quantified in the database.

The Intel processor wins in every benchmark category where data exists. Its 12 threads, compared to the Snapdragon's 8, allow for better parallel processing in multi-threaded applications. The Passmark data compression score of 202225 and data encryption score of 11964 further solidify Intel's lead in productivity and security-related tasks. The Snapdragon's wins are structural: lower power draw, newer process technology, and faster memory bandwidth, but these do not translate into recorded benchmark victories.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their underlying architecture. The Intel Core 3 100HL uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS codename, and is manufactured on a 10 nm process node by Intel. It features a hybrid core layout with 8 cores and 12 threads, indicating the presence of performance and efficiency cores. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and its PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). It comes with integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 48 execution units.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 uses the Oryon codename and belongs to the Snapdragon X (Plus) generation. It is built on a 4 nm process node by TSMC, a significant manufacturing advantage over Intel's 10 nm node. This chip has 8 cores and 8 threads, meaning it lacks simultaneous multithreading. Its cache configuration is notably different: 288 KB of L1 cache per core, 12 MB of L2 cache per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Snapdragon exclusively supports LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s, which is a substantial figure compared to Intel's unspecified bandwidth. Its PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only), and it uses an Adreno X1-45 integrated GPU.

The socket types differ completely: Intel uses Socket 1700, while Qualcomm uses BGA 2073. The Intel part is classified as Desktop market segment, released on 2024-04-07, while the Snapdragon is classified as Mobile, released on 2024-09-02. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel chip has a higher TDP of 45 W, while the Snapdragon has a lower TDP of 30 W. These architectural differences explain the performance gap, with Intel prioritizing raw throughput and Qualcomm prioritizing power efficiency and memory bandwidth.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates that the Intel Core 3 100HL is the superior processor for compute-heavy workloads. Its performance percentiles and benchmark scores demonstrate a clear lead in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14948, combined with a 76th percentile ranking, shows that this chip can handle demanding applications like video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation. Its 12 threads provide a tangible advantage over the Snapdragon's 8 threads in parallel processing scenarios. The Passmark integer and floating point math scores, at 56308 and 42108 respectively, confirm its strength in scientific and financial computations.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100, based on its specifications, is built for efficiency rather than peak performance. Its lower TDP of 30 W and advanced 4 nm process node suggest longer battery life in mobile devices, and its higher memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s could benefit certain data-streaming applications. However, the absence of benchmark scores in the database means its performance cannot be verified or compared directly. For users who require maximum computational power, the Intel chip is the definitive choice. For users prioritizing power efficiency and modern memory support, the Snapdragon presents a compelling alternative, but the data does not support a performance verdict in its favor.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core 3 100HL has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has a boost clock of 4.00 GHz.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?

A: Both processors have 8 cores, but the Intel Core 3 100HL has 12 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has 8 threads.

Q: What is the difference in process technology?

A: The Intel Core 3 100HL is manufactured on a 10 nm process node by Intel, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 uses a 4 nm process node by TSMC.

Q: Which processor supports faster memory?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 supports LPDDR5X memory with a recorded bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s, while the Intel Core 3 100HL supports DDR4 and DDR5 but has no recorded bandwidth figure.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each chip?

A: The Intel Core 3 100HL has a TDP of 45 W, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has a TDP of 30 W.

Q: Does the Qualcomm processor have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the database contains no benchmark scores for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100, whereas the Intel Core 3 100HL has 17 recorded benchmark scores.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 3 100HL has a comprehensive set of benchmark scores, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has none, making a direct comparison one-sided. The Intel chip's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14948 is its strongest result, indicating robust multi-threaded performance. Its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6278 and Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1506 follow the same trend. In single-core tests, the Intel part scores 2110 in Cinebench R23, 886 in Cinebench R20, and 212 in Cinebench R15.

The Passmark suite shows the Intel chip's versatility. It scores 56308 in integer math, 42108 in floating point math, and 12463 in extended instructions. The data compression score of 202225 is particularly high, suggesting strong performance in file archiving and compression tasks. The encryption score of 11964 indicates capable security processing. The multithread score of 17586 and single-thread score of 3735 provide a balanced view of its overall capabilities. The random string sorting score of 23223 shows efficient data organization, and the find prime numbers score of 48 is its lowest recorded result.

These scores place the Intel chip at the 76th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23545. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U with an average score of 23709 and a delta of -0.7%, the Intel Core i5-11500 with an average score of 23718 and a delta of -0.7%, the Intel Core Ultra 7 266V with an average score of 23297 and a delta of 1.1%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with an average score of 23277 and a delta of 1.2%. These deltas show that the Intel Core 3 100HL is within 1.2% of these comparable processors, either slightly ahead or slightly behind. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 has no recorded rivals or scores, leaving its performance unmeasured in the database.

Specification Differences

The Intel Core 3 100HL and Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-46-100 differ across nearly every specification category. The Intel chip has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the Qualcomm chip has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The TDP differs significantly: 45 W for Intel versus 30 W for Qualcomm. The sockets are incompatible: Intel Socket 1700 versus Qualcomm BGA 2073.

The cache hierarchies are distinct. Intel uses 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. Qualcomm uses 288 KB of L1 cache per core, 12 MB of L2 cache per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support differs as well: Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, while Qualcomm supports only LPDDR5X. The Qualcomm chip has a recorded memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s, while Intel's is unlisted. PCIe configurations vary: Intel has Gen 4 with 8 lanes, Qualcomm has Gen 4 with 12 lanes. Integrated graphics are also different: Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics 48EU, Qualcomm uses Adreno X1-45. The process nodes differ, with Intel at 10 nm and Qualcomm at 4 nm. The market segments are Desktop for Intel and Mobile for Qualcomm, and their release dates are 2024-04-07 for Intel and 2024-09-02 for Qualcomm. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier, and both are currently active in production.