Intel Celeron G6900T vs Intel Core i5-4670R Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i5-4670R wins every single shared test, and it does so by a remarkably consistent margin. Across all five head-to-head comparisons, the i5-4670R finishes roughly 30% ahead of the Celeron G6900T, with deltas ranging from -29.8% to -30.0% from the Celeron's perspective.

Starting with multi-core performance, the i5-4670R scores 448 in Cinebench R15 multi-core against the G6900T's 314, a 29.9% advantage. The pattern repeats in Cinebench R20 multi-core, where the i5-4670R posts 1868 versus 1309, again a 29.9% lead. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i5-4670R reaches 4448 while the G6900T manages 3117, holding the same 29.9% gap. This consistency across three different Cinebench versions suggests a stable architectural advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk.

Single-core results tell the same story. In Cinebench R20 single-core, the i5-4670R scores 263 against the G6900T's 184, a 30.0% difference. Cinebench R23 single-core sees the i5-4670R at 627 versus 440, a 29.8% gap. The i5-4670R also has a single-core Cinebench R15 score of 63, though the G6900T has no recorded R15 single-core result in the database.

The average benchmark scores illustrate the broader picture. The G6900T averages 1321 across all recorded tests and lands in the 35th percentile of all CPUs. The i5-4670R averages 1286 and also sits in the 35th percentile. Despite the i5-4670R winning every head-to-head test by a wide margin, the two chips occupy the same overall percentile tier because the G6900T's Geekbench results (2460 multi-core, 1422 single-core) are not mirrored by equivalent i5-4670R Geekbench entries in the database. That missing data pulls the Celeron's average upward relative to its Cinebench performance.

Looking at the nearest rivals confirms the competitive positioning. The G6900T's closest neighbor is the Intel Celeron G6900E at an identical average score of 1321, a 0% delta. The Intel Core i5-4570R trails by just 0.2% at 1318, while the Intel Core i7-3770T comes in at 1314, a 0.6% gap. The Intel Core i5-2500K leads the group slightly at 1329, putting the G6900T 0.6% behind. For the i5-4670R, the Intel Core i5-3570 matches its 1286 average exactly, followed by the AMD Opteron 6272 at 1288 (0.1% ahead) and the Intel Core i7-3630QM at 1289 (0.3% ahead). The Intel Core i5-3570K leads at 1293, 0.6% ahead of the i5-4670R.

The takeaway from the head-to-head data is straightforward: the i5-4670R is the faster chip in every measured Cinebench workload, but the overall average scores place both processors in a comparable performance class among their respective peers.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the most benchmark comparisons?

A: The Intel Core i5-4670R wins all five shared head-to-head tests. The Celeron G6900T records zero wins in the direct comparison data.

Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap in Cinebench R23?

A: The i5-4670R scores 4448 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the G6900T scores 3117. That is a 29.9% advantage for the i5-4670R.

Q: Does the Celeron G6900T have any benchmark where it is competitive?

A: The G6900T has Geekbench results of 2460 multi-core and 1422 single-core, but the i5-4670R has no recorded Geekbench scores in the database, so no direct comparison is possible for that test suite.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two CPUs?

A: The G6900T averages 1321 across all recorded benchmarks, while the i5-4670R averages 1286. The Celeron actually holds a higher average score because it has additional Geekbench results that the i5-4670R lacks.

Q: Are both processors in the same overall performance percentile?

A: Yes, both the G6900T and the i5-4670R sit at the 35th percentile of all CPUs in the database, despite the i5-4670R winning every shared test.

Q: How do the nearest rivals compare for each chip?

A: The G6900T's closest rival is the Celeron G6900E at a 0% delta, with the Core i5-4570R 0.2% behind and the Core i7-3770T 0.6% behind. The i5-4670R's closest rival is the Core i5-3570 at a 0% delta, with the AMD Opteron 6272 0.1% ahead and the Core i7-3630QM 0.3% ahead.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from entirely different Intel design eras. The Celeron G6900T uses the Alder Lake architecture on the Alder Lake-S codename and is built on a 10 nm process node. The Core i5-4670R uses the Haswell architecture and codename, built on a 22 nm process node. Both are manufactured by Intel, but the fabrication gap represents roughly a full generation of process technology evolution.

The core configurations differ sharply. The G6900T has 2 cores and 2 threads, while the i5-4670R has 4 cores and 4 threads. This doubling of physical cores is the most obvious structural explanation for the i5-4670R's consistent multi-core lead in the benchmark results.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The G6900T provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, with 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The i5-4670R provides 64 KB of L1 per core and 256 KB of L2 per core, also with 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The Celeron's larger per-core L2 allocation reflects its newer design, but the shared L3 capacity is identical at 4 MB.

The i5-4670R has additional physical data in the database: 1,400 million transistors and a die size of 177 mm². No equivalent transistor count or die size is recorded for the G6900T.

Memory support shows a clear generational split. The G6900T supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, while the i5-4670R supports DDR3. The G6900T also lists PCIe Gen 5 support, while the i5-4670R has no PCIe information recorded.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The G6900T ships with UHD Graphics 710, while the i5-4670R carries Intel Iris? Pro 5200. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

The Celeron G6900T was released on 2022-01-03, while the i5-4670R was released on 2013-06-01. The Celeron's launch MSRP is $42, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the i5-4670R. The G6900T has a locked multiplier, while the i5-4670R has an unlocked multiplier. The G6900T's part number is SRL68, while no part number is recorded for the i5-4670R.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification field.

Cores and threads: The G6900T has 2 cores and 2 threads. The i5-4670R has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Clock speeds: The G6900T has a base clock of 2.80 GHz and no boost clock recorded. The i5-4670R has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 3.70 GHz.

Thermal design power: The G6900T is rated at 35 W TDP, while the i5-4670R is rated at 65 W TDP.

Socket: The G6900T uses Intel Socket 1700, while the i5-4670R uses Intel BGA 1364.

Process node: The G6900T is built on 10 nm, the i5-4670R on 22 nm.

Transistors and die size: The G6900T has no recorded values. The i5-4670R has 1,400 million transistors and a 177 mm² die size.

Cache: The G6900T has 80 KB L1 and 1.25 MB L2 per core. The i5-4670R has 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core. Both have 4 MB shared L3.

Memory support: The G6900T supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory bus. The i5-4670R supports DDR3 with no memory bus information recorded.

PCIe: The G6900T lists Gen 5. The i5-4670R has no PCIe data.

Integrated graphics: The G6900T has UHD Graphics 710. The i5-4670R has Intel Iris? Pro 5200.

Release date: The G6900T launched 2022-01-03. The i5-4670R launched 2013-06-01.

Multiplier: The G6900T is locked. The i5-4670R is unlocked.

Launch MSRP: The G6900T is $42. The i5-4670R has no recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-4670R wins every workload represented in the shared benchmark suite. It leads by 30% in Cinebench R20 single-core, by 29.9% in Cinebench R15 and R20 multi-core, by 29.9% in Cinebench R23 multi-core, and by 29.8% in Cinebench R23 single-core. For users whose primary concern is raw Cinebench throughput, the i5-4670R is the clear choice.

The Celeron G6900T does not win a single head-to-head benchmark, but its profile still has strengths. It draws only 35 W TDP compared to the i5-4670R's 65 W, making it the more power-efficient option on paper. It supports modern DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the i5-4670R is limited to DDR3. The G6900T also has PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, which the i5-4670R lacks entirely in the recorded data. For systems built around current memory standards or newer platform features, the G6900T offers a more up-to-date foundation despite its lower performance.

The i5-4670R counters with a newer architecture in terms of release timing? No, the G6900T is newer by release date. The i5-4670R instead counters with more cores, higher base and boost clocks, an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, and a larger transistor count. It also has a smaller per-core L2 cache, but the 4-core configuration compensates in multi-threaded workloads.

In application scenarios, the i5-4670R is suited for multi-threaded rendering tasks, as demonstrated by its 4448 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The G6900T, with its 3117 score in the same test, is better positioned for basic desktop usage, light productivity, or power-constrained builds where the 35 W TDP and modern memory support matter more than peak throughput.

The Verdict

The data points to a simple conclusion for performance-focused buyers: the Intel Core i5-4670R is the faster processor in every shared benchmark. Its 30% lead across all Cinebench tests, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads against the Celeron's 2 cores and 2 threads, makes it the stronger option for compute-heavy workloads. The unlocked multiplier adds flexibility for users who want to push beyond stock clocks, and the 65 W TDP, while higher than the Celeron's 35 W, is a reasonable trade for the performance gain.

The Celeron G6900T appeals to a different set of priorities. It is the newer part by release date, supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, includes PCIe Gen 5, and carries a 35 W TDP. Its launch MSRP of $42 positions it as a low-cost entry point, but the database does not record a comparable launch price for the i5-4670R. Buyers building a modern platform with current memory standards and lower power consumption in mind may prefer the G6900T despite its benchmark deficit.

The overall percentile ranking places both at the 35th percentile of all CPUs, which tempers the head-to-head result. The i5-4670R wins decisively against the G6900T specifically, yet neither chip stands out within the broader CPU landscape. The i5-4670R is the pick for users who prioritize measured performance in Cinebench workloads. The G6900T is the pick for users who prioritize power efficiency, modern platform features, and newer memory support. Choose accordingly based on which of those two priorities matters more.