Intel Celeron G6900E vs Intel Core i5-4670R Comparison

The Intel Celeron G6900E and the Intel Core i5-4670R represent two very different approaches to desktop processing, separated by nearly a decade of Intel silicon evolution. The Celeron G6900E is a modern Alder Lake-S part, built on a 10 nm process and designed for the Intel Socket 1700 platform, while the Core i5-4670R is a Haswell-era chip from 2013, soldered onto Intel BGA 1364 and manufactured on a 22 nm node. The benchmark data recorded in the database shows a clear pattern, but the story is more nuanced than a simple list of scores. The i5-4670R wins every single head-to-head benchmark, yet both processors land at the 35th percentile among all CPUs, and their average benchmark scores are remarkably close. This raises questions about what the newer, smaller, and more efficient Celeron gives up in raw throughput, and what it gains in platform modernity.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head measurements leave no ambiguity about which processor is faster in every recorded test. Across all six Cinebench runs, the Intel Core i5-4670R leads the Intel Celeron G6900E by a margin that hovers consistently around 18 to 19 percent. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the i5-4670R scores 448 against the Celeron's 366, a delta of -18.3 percent from the Celeron's perspective. The single-core R15 test shows a similar gap: 63 versus 51, a -19 percent difference. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore result is 1868 for the i5-4670R and 1525 for the G6900E, another -18.4 percent delta, while the single-core run has the i5 at 263 and the Celeron at 215, again -18.3 percent. The pattern holds in Cinebench R23, where the i5-4670R posts 4448 multicore and 627 single-core, compared to 3632 and 512 for the Celeron, with the same -18.3 percent gap in both.

The consistency of these deltas is striking. Every benchmark, regardless of the workload or the Cinebench version, produces nearly the same relative difference. This suggests the performance gap is structural, not workload-dependent. The i5-4670R simply has more execution resources, and those resources translate into a steady advantage across both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks. The database also shows the Celeron G6900E has Geekbench results, with a multicore score of 2702 and a single-core score of 1561, but no comparable Geekbench data exists for the i5-4670R, so a direct comparison on that test is not possible.

The average benchmark scores tell a different story. The Celeron G6900E has an average score of 1321, while the i5-4670R sits at 1286. That difference is only about 2.7 percent, and it is driven by the Celeron's inclusion of Geekbench results, which are not present for the i5-4670R. The nearest rivals in the database also put these numbers in context. The Celeron G6900E is essentially tied with the Intel Celeron G6900T (1321, 0 percent delta), the Intel Core i5-4570R (1318, 0.2 percent ahead), and the Intel Core i7-3770T (1314, 0.6 percent ahead), while trailing the Intel Core i5-2500K by 0.6 percent. The i5-4670R, meanwhile, is tied with the Intel Core i5-3570 (1286, 0 percent), and slightly trails the AMD Opteron 6272 (-0.1 percent), the Intel Core i7-3630QM (-0.3 percent), and the Intel Core i5-3570K (-0.6 percent). So while the i5-4670R wins the direct head-to-head Cinebench tests, the broader database shows both chips occupying a similar performance tier.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is substantial. The Celeron G6900E is built on Alder Lake-S architecture, Intel's hybrid design that pairs performance cores with efficiency cores, though this particular Celeron has only 2 cores and 2 threads. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundries. The i5-4670R, in contrast, uses the Haswell architecture, a monolithic design with 4 cores and 4 threads, manufactured on a 22 nm process, also by Intel. The transistor count and die size tell the story of the older part's complexity: the i5-4670R packs 1,400 million transistors into a 177 mm² die. The Celeron G6900E has no recorded transistor or die size data, but its smaller process node and lower core count imply a very different physical design.

Cache hierarchies differ as well. The Celeron G6900E has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, with 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The i5-4670R has 64 KB of L1 per core and 256 KB of L2 per core, also with 4 MB of shared L3. The Celeron's larger per-core L1 and L2 caches are a product of its newer architecture, and they likely help it close some of the gap in single-threaded performance despite having half the cores. The i5-4670R compensates with four full cores, each capable of independent execution, which explains its multicore lead.

Clock speeds are a point of convergence and divergence. Both processors have a base clock of 3.00 GHz. The i5-4670R, however, has a boost clock of 3.70 GHz, while the Celeron G6900E has no boost clock listed in the database. The i5-4670R also has an unlocked multiplier, meaning it can be overclocked, whereas the Celeron G6900E is locked. The i5-4670R carries a TDP of 65 watts, against 46 watts for the Celeron, a difference that reflects the older chip's higher power draw and more aggressive thermal requirements.

The integrated graphics also differ. The Celeron G6900E uses Intel UHD Graphics 710, while the i5-4670R features Intel Iris? Pro 5200. The question mark in the database entry for the Iris Pro 5200 is notable, but the data records it as the i5's graphics solution. Memory support is another clear split: the Celeron G6900E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, while the i5-4670R is limited to DDR3. The Celeron also has PCIe Gen 5 support, while the i5-4670R has no PCIe data recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Celeron G6900E has an average benchmark score of 1321, while the Intel Core i5-4670R has an average score of 1286. The Celeron is about 2.7 percent higher, but this is influenced by the fact that the Celeron has Geekbench results recorded, while the i5-4670R does not.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The Intel Celeron G6900E has 2 cores and 2 threads. The Intel Core i5-4670R has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What is the difference in process node and socket?

A: The Celeron G6900E is built on a 10 nm process and uses the Intel Socket 1700. The i5-4670R is built on a 22 nm process and uses the Intel BGA 1364 socket.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: No. Both the Intel Celeron G6900E and the Intel Core i5-4670R have ECC memory support listed as false in the database.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The Celeron G6900E supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. The i5-4670R supports DDR3 only.

Q: Is the multiplier unlocked on either processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-4670R has an unlocked multiplier, meaning it can be overclocked. The Intel Celeron G6900E does not have an unlocked multiplier.

Specification Differences

The specification table for these two processors differs in several key areas. The Celeron G6900E has 2 cores and 2 threads, while the i5-4670R has 4 cores and 4 threads. Both have a base clock of 3.00 GHz, but the i5-4670R adds a boost clock of 3.70 GHz, which the Celeron lacks. The TDP is 46 watts for the Celeron and 65 watts for the i5-4670R. The Celeron uses the Intel Socket 1700, while the i5-4670R uses the Intel BGA 1364. The architecture is Alder Lake for the Celeron and Haswell for the i5. The process node is 10 nm for the Celeron and 22 nm for the i5. The i5-4670R has recorded transistor and die size data, 1,400 million transistors and 177 mm², while the Celeron has none.

The cache configurations differ: the Celeron has 80 KB of L1 per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, while the i5 has 64 KB of L1 per core and 256 KB of L2 per core. Both share 4 MB of L3 cache. Memory support is DDR4 and DDR5 for the Celeron, DDR3 for the i5. The Celeron has dual-channel memory bus support, while the i5 has no memory bus data. PCIe support is listed as Gen 5 for the Celeron, with no data for the i5. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 710 for the Celeron and Intel Iris? Pro 5200 for the i5. The multiplier is unlocked only on the i5-4670R. The Celeron was released on 2022-01-03, while the i5-4670R was released on 2013-06-01. Neither has a recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-4670R wins every single head-to-head benchmark in the database. Across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, both multicore and single-core, the i5-4670R leads by 18 to 19 percent. That makes it the clear choice for any workload that relies on CPU throughput, whether that is rendering, compiling, or running multi-threaded applications. The i5-4670R also has an unlocked multiplier, which means users can push it beyond its stock 3.70 GHz boost clock, potentially widening the gap further.

The Intel Celeron G6900E, despite losing all head-to-head tests, has its own strengths. It has a lower TDP of 46 watts versus 65 watts, making it a more energy-efficient option for compact or passively cooled systems. It supports modern memory standards, DDR4 and DDR5, in dual-channel mode, while the i5-4670R is stuck with DDR3. The Celeron also has PCIe Gen 5 support, which the i5 lacks entirely, and it uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is a current, active socket. Its larger per-core L1 and L2 caches, 80 KB and 1.25 MB respectively, are a sign of its newer architecture, and its Geekbench scores, 2702 multicore and 1561 single-core, show reasonable performance for a dual-core part.

The Celeron G6900E also has a more recent release date, 2022-01-03, compared to the i5-4670R's 2013-06-01. That means it is a current production part, listed as active in the database, and it benefits from a decade of architectural improvements. For single-threaded tasks, the gap is surprisingly small given the core count difference: the i5-4670R leads by only 18 to 19 percent, not the 100 percent one might expect from double the cores. The Celeron's newer architecture and larger caches likely contribute to this.

The Verdict

The data points in two directions. For raw performance, the Intel Core i5-4670R is the winner. It beats the Celeron G6900E in every recorded benchmark, and it does so by a consistent margin of roughly 18 percent. Its four cores and 3.70 GHz boost clock give it a clear throughput advantage, and its unlocked multiplier adds flexibility for enthusiasts willing to overclock. If the task is to maximize compute performance, the i5-4670R is the better choice.

For platform modernity and efficiency, the Intel Celeron G6900E has the edge. It draws less power, supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, has PCIe Gen 5, and fits into the Intel Socket 1700 ecosystem. It is a current, active product, while the i5-4670R, despite also being listed as active, uses a decade-old socket and memory standard. The Celeron's average benchmark score of 1321 is even slightly higher than the i5's 1286, though that includes Geekbench data the i5 does not have.

The final call depends on the use case. A user building a new system on a modern platform, with an eye toward low power consumption and current memory and PCIe standards, would find the Celeron G6900E sufficient for basic desktop tasks. A user who needs the maximum compute throughput from these two options, and who is willing to work with an older socket and DDR3 memory, would choose the i5-4670R. The benchmark data is unambiguous: the i5-4670R is faster, but the Celeron G6900E is newer, more efficient, and better connected to the present hardware landscape.