Intel Arc G3 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265F Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc G3 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265F occupy entirely different segments of the processor market, and the benchmark data reflects that split clearly. The Arc G3 is a mobile-focused part with a modest core count and a 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs, meaning it sits near the middle of the distribution. The Core Ultra 7 265F, by contrast, is a desktop processor that lands in the 93rd percentile, indicating top-tier performance among all recorded CPUs.

The Arc G3 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its wins are defined by its feature set rather than measured performance. It integrates Arc B370 graphics, making it a viable option for systems that require GPU capability without a discrete card. Its memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s exceeds the Core Ultra 7 265F's 102.4 GB/s, which favors the mobile chip in memory-intensive workloads that fit within its power envelope.

The Core Ultra 7 265F wins decisively on raw compute. It posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41980 and a single-core score of 5926. In PassMark tests, it delivers 49410 in multithread, 4750 in single-thread, and 173855 in floating-point math. The Arc G3 cannot compete on these metrics because no benchmark data exists for it, and its 14 cores versus 20 cores, plus a 1.90 GHz base clock versus 2.40 GHz, place it at a structural disadvantage.

The use-case split is clear: the Arc G3 serves portable, integrated-graphics systems where power draw of 25 W and a BGA socket matter more than peak throughput. The Core Ultra 7 265F serves desktop builds where 65 W TDP, a socketed platform, and high multi-core scores are the priorities.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share a 3 nm process node, but the similarities end there. The Arc G3 uses Intel's Panther Lake architecture and is fabricated by Intel's own foundry. The Core Ultra 7 265F uses Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-S, and is fabricated by TSMC. This foundry split means the two chips come from different manufacturing lines despite the same process size.

The Arc G3 packs 14 cores and 14 threads, with no hyper-threading. Its base clock is 1.90 GHz and boost clock is 4.60 GHz. It uses LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, which explains its higher memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s. The chip is built on Intel BGA 2540, a soldered mobile socket, and includes integrated Arc B370 graphics. Its cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3.

The Core Ultra 7 265F provides 20 cores and 20 threads, also without hyper-threading. Its base clock is 2.40 GHz and boost clock reaches 5.30 GHz. It uses DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, yielding 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The socket is Intel Socket 1851, a standard desktop platform. It has no integrated graphics. Its cache structure is larger: 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. The Core Ultra 7 265F also carries 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, figures absent for the Arc G3.

PCIe connectivity differs substantially. The Arc G3 provides Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 7 265F offers Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). This gives the desktop part five times the PCIe lane count, which matters for discrete GPUs and expansion cards. Neither chip supports ECC memory, and both have locked multipliers. The Arc G3 has a production status of Active with a release date of May 27, 2026, while the Core Ultra 7 265F is also Active with a release date of January 6, 2025.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No direct head-to-head benchmark entries exist in the database for these two processors. The Arc G3 has zero recorded benchmark scores, while the Core Ultra 7 265F has a full suite of results. The comparison therefore relies on the Core Ultra 7 265F's absolute scores and its position relative to its nearest rivals.

The Core Ultra 7 265F achieves an average benchmark score of 64438. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 (average score 64640, delta -0.3%), the AMD EPYC 7343 (average score 64202, delta 0.4%), the AMD EPYC 4464P (average score 64823, delta -0.6%), and the Intel Core i9-13900KS (average score 64051, delta 0.6%). These deltas are all within one percentage point, indicating the Core Ultra 7 265F sits in a tightly contested performance band.

In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 41980 and single-core score of 5926 show strong scaling. The R20 results (17631 multi-core, 2488 single-core) and R15 results (4231 multi-core, 597 single-core) follow the expected pattern. PassMark tests reveal workload-specific strengths: data compression scores 507018, data encryption scores 39468, and extended instructions score 39235. Integer math hits 138078, while floating-point math reaches 173855. Prime number finding scores 416, random string sorting scores 62439, and physics scores 3172.

The Arc G3's lack of benchmark data means no direct numeric comparison is possible. The database records a percentile of 50 for the Arc G3 versus 93 for the Core Ultra 7 265F, which places the desktop chip far ahead in overall standing. The Arc G3's 14 threads cannot match the 20 threads of the Core Ultra 7 265F, and its lower boost clock of 4.60 GHz versus 5.30 GHz further widens the gap in single-threaded tasks.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has 20 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The Arc G3 provides 136.5 GB/s using LPDDR5X memory. The Core Ultra 7 265F provides 102.4 GB/s using DDR5 memory. Both use dual-channel buses.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 7 265F have integrated graphics?

A: No. The Core Ultra 7 265F has no integrated graphics (listed as N/A). The Arc G3 includes Arc B370 integrated graphics.

Q: How do their cache sizes compare?

A: The L1 cache is identical at 192 KB per core. The L2 cache differs: 2.5 MB per core on the Arc G3 versus 3 MB per core on the Core Ultra 7 265F. The L3 cache is 18 MB shared on the Arc G3 versus 30 MB shared on the Core Ultra 7 265F.

Q: What sockets do they use?

A: The Arc G3 uses Intel BGA 2540, a mobile socket. The Core Ultra 7 265F uses Intel Socket 1851, a desktop socket.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each?

A: The Arc G3 ranks in the 50th percentile among all CPUs. The Core Ultra 7 265F ranks in the 93rd percentile.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc G3 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265F |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 14 | 20 |

| Threads | 14 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 1.90 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 5.30 GHz |

| TDP | 25 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 2540 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Architecture | Panther Lake | Arrow Lake |

| Codename | Panther Lake | Arrow Lake-S |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 18 MB (shared) | 30 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 136.5 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 4 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Arc B370 | N/A |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Transistors | Not recorded | 17,800 million |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 243 mm² |

| Release Date | 2026-05-27 | 2025-01-06 |

| Part Number | SA4QZ | SRQCV |

The Verdict

The data supports a clear separation of roles. The Intel Arc G3 is a mobile processor designed for compact systems where integrated graphics and low power draw of 25 W are essential. Its LPDDR5X memory and 136.5 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for portable workloads that prioritize memory speed over raw core throughput. The 50th percentile ranking indicates mid-pack performance among all CPUs, which is acceptable for its segment.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a desktop processor with a 65 W TDP and a 93rd percentile ranking. Its benchmark scores demonstrate strong multi-threaded capability: 41980 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 49410 in PassMark multithread. The single-core score of 5926 in R23 and 4750 in PassMark single-thread confirm solid per-thread performance. Its 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes support discrete expansion, and its 30 MB L3 cache benefits data-heavy workloads.

Users needing a portable, all-in-one CPU with graphics should pick the Arc G3. Users building a desktop with a discrete GPU and demanding high multi-core scores should pick the Core Ultra 7 265F. The Core Ultra 7 265F also has a launch MSRP of $379, while the Arc G3 has no recorded launch MSRP. The benchmark database contains no scores for the Arc G3, so any performance claims for it must rely on its architectural specifications rather than measured results.