AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Intel Core i7-12700T Comparison

The Intel Core i7-12700T and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 represent two very different approaches to desktop computing, separated by process technology, platform philosophy, and intended use case. The data shows the Threadripper 1920 winning every single head-to-head benchmark in the database, yet the i7-12700T holds a slight edge in the aggregated average benchmark score. This unusual combination of results deserves a closer look at what each processor actually does well, and where the numbers might mislead a buyer looking for a specific workload.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 wins every benchmark recorded in the head-to-head comparison. Across all six Cinebench tests, both single-core and multi-core, the Threadripper 1920 posts higher scores. The margin is consistent, sitting at 4 percent in five of the six tests and 3.8 percent in the Cinebench R15 single-core run. This means the Threadripper 1920 is the outright performance leader in pure compute throughput, whether the workload is lightly threaded or heavily parallelized. The multi-core wins are particularly relevant because the Threadripper 1920 offers 24 threads versus the i7-12700T’s 20 threads, even though both chips have 12 physical cores.

The Intel Core i7-12700T does not win any of the recorded head-to-head benchmarks, but it does claim a higher average benchmark score across all tests in the database. The i7-12700T posts an average score of 5606, while the Threadripper 1920 sits at 5425. This is a narrow margin, roughly 3.3 percent in favor of Intel, and it comes from the i7-12700T having additional Geekbench results in its record. The Threadripper 1920 has no Geekbench scores in the database, so the average comparison is not a direct apples-to-apples measurement. In the benchmarks where both chips appear, the Threadripper 1920 is always ahead.

The real differentiation is in platform capabilities rather than raw benchmark wins. The i7-12700T offers integrated graphics with UHD Graphics 770, allowing a system to run without a discrete GPU. The Threadripper 1920 has no integrated graphics at all. The i7-12700T also runs on a 35 W TDP, a dramatically lower power envelope than the Threadripper 1920’s 140 W TDP. For a compact or low-noise build, the i7-12700T is the clear choice. For maximum compute throughput in a workstation where power draw is secondary, the Threadripper 1920 wins on every measured benchmark.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design eras. The i7-12700T uses Intel’s Alder Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process at Intel’s own foundry. It is a hybrid design with a die size of 215 mm². The Threadripper 1920 uses AMD’s original Zen architecture, built on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries, with a dual-die configuration totaling 2x 213 mm² and 9,600 million transistors.

The core and cache layouts differ substantially. The i7-12700T has 12 cores and 20 threads, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. The Threadripper 1920 also has 12 cores but 24 threads, with 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of L3 cache. The Threadripper 1920’s larger L3 pool and higher thread count give it an advantage in workloads that scale well beyond 20 threads. The i7-12700T compensates with a much higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz versus the Threadripper 1920’s 3.80 GHz, yet the benchmark data shows the Threadripper still wins even the single-core tests, which suggests the older Zen architecture’s IPC advantage in these specific Cinebench runs outweighs the clock speed deficit.

Memory and I/O also point in different directions. The i7-12700T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, while the Threadripper 1920 supports only DDR4 but in a quad-channel configuration with a recorded memory bandwidth of 85.3 GB/s. The i7-12700T offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Threadripper 1920 uses PCIe Gen 3 with 60 lanes. The Threadripper’s massive lane count makes it a better fit for multi-GPU or high-density storage systems, while the i7-12700T’s newer PCIe generation provides higher per-lane bandwidth.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench R15 multi-core test shows the Threadripper 1920 scoring 1890 against the i7-12700T’s 1815, a 4 percent difference. This is a modest gap, but it appears consistently across every Cinebench version. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Threadripper 1920 scores 266 versus 256, a 3.8 percent win. The single-core margin is slightly smaller than the multi-core margin, but the direction is the same.

Cinebench R20 repeats the pattern. Multi-core shows the Threadripper 1920 at 7877 and the i7-12700T at 7565, again a 4 percent difference. Single-core shows 1111 versus 1067, also 4 percent. Cinebench R23 follows with the Threadripper 1920 posting 18756 in multi-core and the i7-12700T at 18012, a 4 percent gap. Single-core R23 shows 2647 versus 2542, another 4 percent gap.

The consistency is striking. Every Cinebench generation, from R15 through R23, produces nearly the same relative outcome. This indicates the Threadripper 1920’s advantage is structural rather than workload-specific, tied to its 24 threads and higher per-core performance in these rendering tests. The i7-12700T’s higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz does not translate into a win in any Cinebench test, and its lower thread count limits its multi-core ceiling. The Geekbench scores for the i7-12700T, 11502 multi-core and 2089 single-core, have no direct counterpart in the Threadripper 1920’s records, so they cannot be used for a direct comparison. The recorded data, however, is unambiguous: the Threadripper 1920 wins every test where both chips appear.

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is the faster processor in every benchmark where both are measured. If the priority is raw rendering performance, the Threadripper 1920 is the correct choice, with a 4 percent lead across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both single and multi-core tests. Its 24 threads and 32 MB of L3 cache provide a structural advantage that the i7-12700T cannot overcome despite its higher boost clock. The Threadripper 1920 also offers quad-channel DDR4 memory and 60 PCIe Gen 3 lanes, making it a strong candidate for workstation builds that need memory bandwidth and expansion capacity.

The Intel Core i7-12700T is the better fit for systems where power efficiency and integrated graphics matter. Its 35 W TDP is dramatically lower than the Threadripper 1920’s 140 W TDP, and the inclusion of UHD Graphics 770 means no discrete GPU is required for basic display output. The i7-12700T also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in platform choice. Its PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes offers newer connectivity, though far fewer total lanes than the Threadripper platform. For a quiet, compact, or power-conscious build, the i7-12700T is the sensible pick. For a workstation where compute throughput is the only metric that matters, the Threadripper 1920 wins outright.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in multi-core Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 scores 18756 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the Intel Core i7-12700T scores 18012. The Threadripper 1920 leads by 4 percent.

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-12700T have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the i7-12700T includes UHD Graphics 770. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700T has a TDP of 35 W, while the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has a TDP of 140 W. The i7-12700T uses significantly less power.

Q: Which processor supports more PCIe lanes?

A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 supports 60 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core i7-12700T supports 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The Threadripper 1920 has far more total lanes, while the i7-12700T offers a newer PCIe generation.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The Intel Core i7-12700T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 supports only DDR4 but uses a quad-channel configuration with 85.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700T has an average benchmark score of 5606, while the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 5425. However, the Threadripper 1920 wins every head-to-head benchmark in the database, and the i7-12700T’s average includes Geekbench results that the Threadripper 1920 does not have.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-12700T | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 12 | 12 |

| Threads | 20 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 1400.00 MHz | 3.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.70 GHz | 3.80 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 140 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | AMD Socket SP3r2 |

| Architecture | Alder Lake | Zen |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | GlobalFoundries |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 2x 213 mm² |

| Transistors | Not listed | 9,600 million |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 25 MB (shared) | 32 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Quad-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 85.3 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 60 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | None |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Launch MSRP | $339 | Not listed |

| Part Number | SRL4S | YD1920A9UC9AE |