AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Intel Core i5-14401E Comparison

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and the Intel Core i5-14401E represent two fundamentally different approaches to desktop computing. The Threadripper 1920 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from AMD’s first-generation Ryzen Threadripper line, built on the Zen architecture with a 14 nm process. The Core i5-14401E is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from Intel’s Core 14th Gen family, based on the Raptor Lake refresh architecture with a 10 nm process. Benchmark results from the database show a consistent, if narrow, advantage for the AMD part across every recorded test. The data records six head-to-head benchmark comparisons, and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 wins all six. The Intel Core i5-14401E does not win a single recorded test. This outcome is notable because the two processors occupy the same 60th percentile among all CPUs in the database, indicating similar overall standing despite their architectural differences.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records six Cinebench results for each processor, covering both single-core and multi-core workloads across three versions of the test. In every case, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 posts the higher score. The margins are uniform, ranging from 3.1% to 3.3%. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Threadripper 1920 scores 1890 against 1830 for the Core i5-14401E, a 3.3% lead. The single-core R15 result is 266 versus 258, a 3.1% advantage. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multi-core scores are 7877 and 7627, again a 3.3% difference, while the single-core scores are 1111 and 1076, a 3.3% gap. Cinebench R23 shows the same pattern: multi-core 18756 versus 18161, a 3.3% lead, and single-core 2647 versus 2564, a 3.2% lead.

These results indicate that the AMD processor holds a small but consistent edge in both single-threaded and multi-threaded rendering tasks. The 3.3% multi-core advantage is particularly interesting given that the Threadripper 1920 has twice as many cores and threads as the Core i5-14401E. The Intel part compensates for its lower core count with a higher boost clock, listed at 4.70 GHz versus 3.80 GHz for the AMD chip. That boost clock advantage helps the Intel processor stay close, but it does not overcome the raw parallel throughput of the 12-core AMD design. In single-core tests, the Threadripper 1920 still leads by roughly 3%, which suggests that its per-core performance, despite the older Zen architecture and lower boost clock, is sufficient to beat the Raptor Lake refresh part in these specific Cinebench workloads.

When placed in the context of their respective nearest rivals, both processors appear competitive within their own peer groups. The Threadripper 1920 has an average benchmark score of 5425, sitting 0.3% below the Intel Xeon W-1290P and 0.8% below the AMD EPYC 7351P, while running 1.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900TE and 2.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10900KF. The Core i5-14401E has an average benchmark score of 5253, which is 0.1% below the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4, 0.2% above the Intel Core i7-11700B, 0.2% above the Intel Core i9-10850K, and 0.8% above the Intel Core i5-13400T. The overall average benchmark score difference between the two processors is 172 points, with the AMD part ahead. This margin is modest, but it is consistent across every recorded test.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply in their underlying architectures. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses the Zen architecture, specifically the Whitehaven generation, built on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It packs 9,600 million transistors across a dual-die design with a combined die size of 2x 213 mm². The Intel Core i5-14401E uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. Its die size is 215 mm², and the database does not record a transistor count for this part.

Core and thread counts differ significantly. The Threadripper 1920 offers 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Core i5-14401E offers 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD part doubles the core and thread count. Cache layouts also differ. The Threadripper 1920 has 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of L3 cache. The Core i5-14401E has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. While the Intel part has more L2 cache per core, the AMD part has a larger total L3 cache.

Memory support is another key differentiator. The Threadripper 1920 supports DDR4 memory through a quad-channel memory bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 85.3 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory. The Core i5-14401E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The database does not list a memory bandwidth figure for the Intel part. The Intel part does support ECC memory. The AMD part uses an AMD Socket SP3r2, while the Intel part uses an Intel Socket 1700.

PCIe capabilities also differ. The Threadripper 1920 provides PCIe Gen 3 with 60 lanes from the CPU. The Core i5-14401E provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part has integrated graphics in the form of UHD Graphics 730, while the AMD part has no integrated graphics listed. The Threadripper 1920 has an unlocked multiplier, while the Core i5-14401E does not. The AMD processor is marked as end-of-life, while the Intel processor is active. The Intel part has a recorded release date of June 30, 2024. The AMD part has no release date listed. The Threadripper 1920 has a part number of YD1920A9UC9AE, while the Core i5-14401E has a part number of Q49JSRNJS.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 in every recorded Cinebench test. The margins are small, between 3.1% and 3.3%, but they are uniform across single-core and multi-core workloads. For users prioritizing raw Cinebench rendering scores, the AMD part is the stronger choice. The Threadripper 1920 also offers substantially more cores and threads, which can benefit heavily parallel workloads beyond the specific tests recorded here.

However, the Intel Core i5-14401E has its own advantages that the data supports. It has a higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz versus 3.80 GHz for the AMD part, indicating strong short-burst performance potential. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD part is limited to DDR4. It includes integrated graphics, which the AMD part lacks, eliminating the need for a discrete GPU in basic display scenarios. It also supports ECC memory, a feature not present on the AMD part. The Intel processor has a lower TDP of 65 watts against 140 watts for the AMD part, suggesting lower power draw during operation.

The production statuses also differ. The Threadripper 1920 is end-of-life, while the Core i5-14401E is active. For new system builds, the Intel part has the advantage of being a current product. The Intel part also supports PCIe Gen 5, while the AMD part is limited to PCIe Gen 3, which matters for future expansion compatibility. The AMD part provides far more PCIe lanes at 60 versus 16, which can be critical for multi-GPU or high-expansion workstation builds.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 scores 18756, while the Intel Core i5-14401E scores 18161. The AMD part leads by 3.3%.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14401E support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14401E supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920?

A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has a memory bandwidth of 85.3 GB/s, supported by a quad-channel DDR4 memory bus.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 have integrated graphics?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has no integrated graphics listed. The Intel Core i5-14401E includes UHD Graphics 730.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the Intel Core i5-14401E provide?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 provides PCIe Gen 3 with 60 lanes.

Q: What are the core counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 wins in every recorded benchmark test. The data shows a 3.3% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core, R20 multi-core, and R23 multi-core, and a 3.1% to 3.3% lead in the corresponding single-core tests. The AMD part also wins on core count, thread count, total L3 cache, memory bandwidth, PCIe lane count, and unlocked multiplier support. For workloads that scale with thread count, such as rendering, video encoding, or scientific simulation, the Threadripper 1920 has the structural advantage of 24 threads.

The Intel Core i5-14401E wins on architecture modernity, with a newer Raptor Lake refresh design on a 10 nm process. It has a higher boost clock, supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, includes integrated graphics, supports ECC memory, and has a lower TDP. Its dual-channel memory bus and 16 PCIe lanes are more limited than the AMD part, but its PCIe Gen 5 support is a forward-looking feature. For a compact desktop build with integrated graphics and lower power draw, the Intel part is the more practical option.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on nearly every recorded specification. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 3.20 GHz for the AMD part and 2.50 GHz for the Intel part. Boost clocks are 3.80 GHz for the AMD part and 4.70 GHz for the Intel part. TDP is 140 watts for the AMD part and 65 watts for the Intel part. The AMD part uses AMD Socket SP3r2, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.

The process nodes differ: 14 nm for the AMD part, 10 nm for the Intel part. The AMD part is built at GlobalFoundries, while the Intel part is built at Intel. The AMD part has 9,600 million transistors and a die size of 2x 213 mm², while the Intel part has no listed transistor count and a die size of 215 mm². L1 cache is 96 KB per core for the AMD part and 80 KB per core for the Intel part. L2 cache is 512 KB per core for the AMD part and 1.25 MB per core for the Intel part. L3 cache is 32 MB for the AMD part and 20 MB shared for the Intel part.

Memory support differs: the AMD part supports DDR4 only, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. The memory bus is quad-channel for the AMD part and dual-channel for the Intel part. Memory bandwidth is 85.3 GB/s for the AMD part, with no figure listed for the Intel part. ECC support is absent on the AMD part and present on the Intel part. PCIe is Gen 3 with 60 lanes for the AMD part and Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the Intel part. Integrated graphics are absent on the AMD part and present as UHD Graphics 730 on the Intel part. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel part does not. The AMD part is end-of-life, while the Intel part is active with a release date of June 30, 2024.