AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Intel Core i5-1350P Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between the Intel Core i5-1350P and the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is remarkably one-sided. Across all six recorded Cinebench tests, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 emerges as the winner. The Intel Core i5-1350P does not claim a single victory in this head-to-head dataset.

In the Cinebench R15 multicore test, the AMD part scores 1730 against Intel's 1664, a delta of negative 3.8 percent from Intel's perspective. The R15 singlecore test shows a similar pattern: AMD scores 244, Intel scores 234, with a delta of negative 4.1 percent. The R20 multicore test has AMD at 7212 and Intel at 6935, again a negative 3.8 percent delta. R20 singlecore is 1018 for AMD versus 979 for Intel, the same negative 3.8 percent delta. The R23 multicore test shows AMD at 17172 and Intel at 16514, a negative 3.8 percent delta. Finally, R23 singlecore is 2424 for AMD against 2331 for Intel, also a negative 3.8 percent delta.

The consistency of these results is striking. In five of the six tests, the delta is exactly negative 3.8 percent. Only the R15 singlecore test deviates, with a slightly larger margin of negative 4.1 percent. This uniformity suggests that the performance advantage of the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is systemic, not workload-specific, scaling evenly across both single-threaded and multi-threaded rendering tasks.

The average benchmark score reinforces this picture. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has an average score of 4967, while the Intel Core i5-1350P trails at 4776. Both processors sit in the 59th percentile among all CPUs in the database, indicating that despite the AMD part's consistent lead, both are positioned at the same overall performance tier relative to the broader market.

Looking at the nearest rivals in the database, the Intel Core i5-1350P sits within a tight cluster. The Intel Xeon W-1290E averages 4775, a delta of 0 percent, making it an essentially identical match in average score. The AMD EPYC 7252 averages 4772, a delta of 0.1 percent. The Intel Xeon E-2386G averages 4799, a delta of negative 0.5 percent, and the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X averages 4807, a delta of negative 0.6 percent. The Intel part is therefore surrounded by competitors within a roughly 35-point band.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48, by contrast, is clustered around a slightly higher average. The Intel Core i5-12600HE averages 4980, a delta of negative 0.3 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 4700G averages 4949, a delta of 0.4 percent. The Intel Core i7-1375PRE averages 4985, a delta of negative 0.4 percent, and the Intel Xeon W-2150B averages 4992, a delta of negative 0.5 percent. The AMD part's nearest competitors are all in the 4949 to 4992 range, placing it in a slightly higher performance neighborhood than the Intel Core i5-1350P's rivals.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Core i5-1350P is built on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-P codename, and belongs to the Core i5 (Raptor Lake-P) generation. It uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel itself. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is built on Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt codename, belonging to the Ryzen Embedded (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)) generation. It uses a 6 nm process node fabricated by TSMC.

Core configurations differ notably. The Intel part packs 12 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads. Both support the same thread count, but Intel achieves this with more physical cores, which implies a hybrid arrangement in the Raptor Lake design. The AMD part relies on simultaneous multithreading across fewer cores.

Clock speeds favor the Intel part in raw terms. Intel lists a base clock of 1900.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. AMD lists a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz. The Intel chip has a significantly higher boost ceiling, but the AMD chip runs at a much higher base clock, which helps explain its consistent benchmark lead despite the lower peak frequency.

Cache hierarchies are structured differently. The Intel Core i5-1350P has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part thus offers more total L3 cache, while the Intel part offers more L2 cache per core.

Memory support separates the two clearly. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The AMD part supports only DDR5 memory, also dual-channel, but it lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, a figure the Intel entry does not provide. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, while the Intel part does not, a significant differentiator for embedded and reliability-focused deployments.

Power and physical specifications also diverge. The Intel Core i5-1350P has a TDP of 28 watts and uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has a TDP of 45 watts and uses the AMD Socket FP7. The Intel part is classified in the Mobile market segment, while the AMD part is classified as Desktop. The Intel part carries integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while the AMD part has no listed integrated graphics. Both support PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU only.

Release timing is close. The Intel part was released on 2023-01-03, while the AMD part was released on 2022-09-26, making the AMD chip the earlier launch by a few months. The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $320, while the AMD part has no listed launch MSRP. Both are currently marked as Active in production status, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 wins every single benchmark in this comparison, so the use-case split is defined more by what the Intel part offers outside of raw Cinebench scores.

For rendering workloads, the AMD part is the clear choice. The data shows a consistent negative 3.8 percent delta across multicore and singlecore tests in R15, R20, and R23. The R23 multicore score of 17172 versus 16514 is the largest absolute gap, representing a 658-point advantage. Even in singlecore, where the Intel boost clock of 4.70 GHz might be expected to help, the AMD part still leads with 2424 versus 2331 in R23 singlecore. The higher base clock of 3.30 GHz appears to deliver more real-world throughput than the Intel part's higher boost ceiling.

For systems requiring ECC memory, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is the only option of the two, since the Intel part does not support ECC. The AMD part also supports only DDR5 memory, which aligns with its 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth figure. For applications that need validated memory integrity, the AMD part's ECC support is decisive.

The Intel Core i5-1350P does have advantages in specific areas. Its 28 watt TDP is significantly lower than the AMD part's 45 watts, making it better suited for power-constrained mobile designs. Its integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU provides a display output and basic graphics capability without a discrete GPU, whereas the AMD part has no integrated graphics listed. The Intel part also supports DDR4 memory, which can simplify upgrades or lower system cost in existing platforms, though the database does not provide pricing guidance.

The Intel part's 12 cores versus 8 cores may also matter in scenarios that the Cinebench suite does not capture, though the recorded benchmark data shows the AMD part ahead in all tested rendering loads. The Intel part's higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz could benefit bursty single-threaded tasks, but the benchmark results do not confirm this advantage in Cinebench R15, R20, or R23 singlecore tests.

For embedded deployments, the AMD part's Desktop market segment classification and ECC support make it the more robust choice. For thin-and-light mobile devices, the Intel part's lower TDP and integrated graphics give it the edge in platform design flexibility.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has an average benchmark score of 4967, while the Intel Core i5-1350P has an average score of 4776.

Q: How much faster is the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The AMD part scores 17172 in Cinebench R23 multicore, while the Intel part scores 16514, a delta of negative 3.8 percent from Intel's perspective.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-1350P support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-1350P does not support ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 does support ECC memory.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-1350P has a TDP of 28 watts, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-1350P has 12 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 have integrated graphics?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has no listed integrated graphics. The Intel Core i5-1350P includes Iris Xe Graphics 80EU.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 outperforms the Intel Core i5-1350P in every recorded Cinebench test, with a consistent negative 3.8 percent delta across five of six tests and a negative 4.1 percent delta in the sixth. Its average benchmark score of 4967 exceeds the Intel part's 4776 by 191 points, and both sit at the 59th percentile among all CPUs.

The AMD part's advantages extend beyond raw performance. It supports ECC memory, which the Intel part does not. It offers 16 MB of shared L3 cache versus 12 MB. It has a higher base clock of 3.30 GHz and a memory bandwidth figure of 76.8 GB/s. Its 6 nm TSMC process node is more advanced than Intel's 10 nm node.

The Intel Core i5-1350P counters with a lower TDP of 28 watts versus 45 watts, making it the better fit for power-sensitive mobile designs. It includes integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while the AMD part has none. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering platform flexibility. Its 12 cores and 16 threads provide more physical cores, and its 4.70 GHz boost clock is the highest listed between the two.

For users prioritizing raw rendering performance, ECC support, and embedded reliability, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is the data-backed choice. For users building power-constrained mobile systems that need integrated graphics and memory flexibility, the Intel Core i5-1350P offers the relevant features, despite its benchmark deficit. The recorded data shows no scenario in this test suite where the Intel part wins, so the AMD part is the default recommendation for benchmark-focused buyers.