AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718 vs Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a remarkably consistent picture: the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 wins every single head-to-head comparison against the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718, though the margins are uniformly narrow. Across all six Cinebench tests, the Intel part leads by margins ranging from 2.1% to 2.2%, which is a strikingly tight band of performance difference given the architectural gulf between the two processors.

In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Xeon E5-2669 v3 scores 1379 against the Ryzen Embedded V2718's 1350, a 2.1% advantage. The single-core R15 result follows the same pattern: 194 versus 190, again a 2.1% delta. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore score sees the Intel part at 5749 with the AMD chip at 5626, a 2.2% gap. The single-core R20 test shows 811 versus 794, a 2.1% difference. In Cinebench R23, the multicore result is 13690 for Intel and 13396 for AMD, a 2.2% lead, while single-core lands at 1932 versus 1891, also a 2.2% margin.

The consistency of these numbers is notable. No test shows the AMD processor pulling ahead, and no test shows the Intel processor extending its lead beyond 2.2%. This suggests that the two chips are performing at essentially the same level in these workloads, with the Xeon holding a small but repeatable edge. The average benchmark scores from the database confirm the closeness: the Xeon E5-2669 v3 sits at 3959, while the Ryzen Embedded V2718 records 3875. That places the Intel part at the 57th percentile of all CPUs in the database, versus the 56th percentile for the AMD chip.

The nearest rival data for the Xeon E5-2669 v3 reinforces this positioning. The AMD Ryzen 3 7330U matches it almost exactly with an average score of 3958 and a 0% delta. The Intel Core i7-6900K is 0.3% behind at 3970, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is also 0.3% behind at 3971, and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G trails by 0.5% with a score of 3977. For the Ryzen Embedded V2718, the closest competitor is the Intel Core i7-11700T at 3864, which is 0.3% ahead of it. The AMD Ryzen 5 4600GE sits 0.8% ahead at 3906, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS is 1.3% ahead at 3924, and the Intel Xeon E-2286M is 1.4% behind at 3822.

Where Each One Wins

The win distribution in this matchup is lopsided: the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 takes all six head-to-head tests, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718 records zero wins. This does not mean the AMD chip is without merit, but the data clearly favors the Intel processor in every measured Cinebench workload.

For users prioritizing raw multi-threaded throughput in rendering or content creation, the Xeon's 12 cores and 24 threads give it a structural advantage over the Ryzen Embedded V2718's 8 cores and 16 threads. The multicore deltas are consistent at 2.1% in R15 and 2.2% in both R20 and R23. The single-core results also favor Intel, with deltas of 2.1% in R15 and R20 and 2.2% in R23, which is somewhat unexpected given the AMD part's much higher boost clock of 4.15 GHz versus the Xeon's 3.10 GHz. The data shows that the older Haswell architecture holds its own even in single-threaded performance, which is where the newer Zen 2 design would normally be expected to shine.

The Ryzen Embedded V2718 does have advantages that do not show up in Cinebench scores. Its integrated Radeon Graphics with 448 shader processors means it can handle display output without a separate GPU, while the Xeon E5-2669 v3 has no integrated graphics at all. For embedded or compact systems where a discrete graphics card is undesirable, that is a meaningful capability. Additionally, the AMD chip's 10 W TDP versus the Xeon's 120 W TDP represents a dramatic difference in power envelope, which the database records but which does not factor into the raw performance scores. The Ryzen part also uses a 7 nm process from TSMC with 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die, whereas the Intel chip uses a 22 nm process with 2,600 million transistors on a 356 mm² die.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is substantial. The Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 is built on the Haswell-EP architecture, a 22 nm design from Intel's own foundry. It packs 12 cores and 24 threads with a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 3.10 GHz. The die measures 356 mm² and contains 2,600 million transistors. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 cache. Memory support spans both DDR3 and DDR4 across a quad-channel bus, delivering 68.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The PCIe implementation is Gen 3 with 40 lanes from the CPU. ECC memory is supported, and the part is classified as a Server/Workstation product. It is now end-of-life.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718 belongs to the Ryzen Embedded 2000 series and uses the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Renoir. It is built on a 7 nm process at TSMC, with 8 cores and 16 threads. The base clock is listed at 1700.00 MHz (1.70 GHz) with a boost clock of 4.15 GHz, a much wider clock range than the Intel part. The die is 156 mm² and holds 9,800 million transistors, which is over three and a half times the transistor count of the Intel chip in less than half the die area. The cache arrangement gives 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3, which is considerably less than the Xeon's 30 MB. Memory support is limited to DDR4 on a dual-channel bus, with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. PCIe is Gen 3 with 20 lanes. ECC is supported, and the chip includes Radeon Graphics with 448 shader processors. It is an active product released in November 2020, and it uses the AMD Socket FP6.

The process node difference is the most visible architectural gap: 22 nm for Intel versus 7 nm for AMD. The Xeon's 356 mm² die is more than twice the size of the Ryzen's 156 mm², yet the AMD part crams in far more transistors. The L3 cache situation is reversed, however, with Intel offering 30 MB shared versus AMD's 8 MB. The memory controllers differ as well, with Intel running quad-channel DDR3/DDR4 versus AMD's dual-channel DDR4, giving the Xeon a 33% bandwidth advantage at 68.3 GB/s versus 51.2 GB/s. The PCIe lane count also favors Intel at 40 lanes versus 20 lanes.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to a clear if narrow winner: the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 outperforms the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718 in every recorded Cinebench test. The margins are small, ranging from 2.1% to 2.2%, but they are uniform across single-core and multi-core workloads. The Xeon's 12 cores and 24 threads give it a structural edge in multi-threaded tasks, and its 30 MB L3 cache and quad-channel memory bus contribute to a higher memory bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s. Its average benchmark score of 3959 places it at the 57th percentile of all CPUs, while the Ryzen Embedded V2718 sits at the 56th percentile with an average of 3875.

For workloads that rely purely on CPU compute, particularly rendering or other multi-threaded tasks, the Xeon E5-2669 v3 is the better choice according to the recorded data. It wins all six head-to-head comparisons and offers more cores, more threads, more cache, and higher memory bandwidth. The trade-off is a TDP of 120 W versus the AMD chip's 10 W, a massive difference in power draw that does not appear in the performance scores but will matter in system design.

The Ryzen Embedded V2718 is not without its own advantages, even if they do not translate into Cinebench wins. Its integrated Radeon Graphics with 448 shader processors means it can drive displays without a discrete GPU, something the Xeon cannot do. Its 7 nm process and 9,800 million transistors in a 156 mm² die represent a far more modern and power-efficient design. For embedded applications where low power consumption and integrated graphics are priorities, the Ryzen part is the sensible option. But for maximum CPU performance in the measured benchmarks, the data favors the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the most head-to-head benchmark comparisons?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 wins all six head-to-head comparisons against the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718, with deltas ranging from 2.1% to 2.2% depending on the test.

Q: How close are the two processors in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 scores 13690 in Cinebench R23 multicore, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718 scores 13396, giving Intel a 2.2% advantage.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference between the two chips?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718 have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718 includes Radeon Graphics with 448 shader processors. The Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 has no integrated graphics.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each processor?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 has a TDP of 120 W, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718 has a TDP of 10 W.

Q: How does the memory bandwidth compare between the two?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 offers 68.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth via a quad-channel DDR3/DDR4 memory bus, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718 provides 51.2 GB/s through a dual-channel DDR4 bus.