AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Intel Core i7-9750H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear picture: the Intel Core i7-9750H wins 16 of the 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons, with the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 taking a single but decisive victory. In the Cinebench suite, the Intel part is consistently about 9.3% ahead across R15, R20, and R23 in both single-core and multi-core tests. For example, in Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i7-9750H scores 8973 against 8207 for the AMD chip, and in single-core it posts 1266 versus 1158. The R15 results mirror this pattern: 904 versus 827 in multi-core and 127 versus 116 in single-core.

The largest Intel advantages appear in the Passmark suite. The single-thread test shows a 49.4% gap (2404 versus 1609), and the physics test is even more lopsided at 51.9% (670 versus 441). Random string sorting favors Intel by 42.6% (19862 versus 13926), and prime number finding shows a 45.5% delta (32 versus 22). Floating point math is 25.9% ahead for Intel (23343 versus 18534), and integer math follows with a 23% lead (37822 versus 30739). Data compression favors the Intel chip by 10.5% (150443 versus 136097), and the multithread Passmark score is also 10.5% higher (10671 versus 9656). Extended instructions show a narrower 4.4% edge for Intel (9187 versus 8799).

The one AMD win is substantial. In Passmark data encryption, the Ryzen Embedded V2546 scores 8046 against Intel's 3756, a delta of 53.3% in AMD's favor. This is a massive reversal and suggests the Zen 2 architecture has a significant advantage in AES or similar cryptographic workloads. No other benchmark in the recorded data shows AMD ahead, making this a workload-specific strength rather than a general trend.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-9750H boosts to 4.50 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 tops out at 3.95 GHz. Intel also has a lower base clock at 2.60 GHz versus AMD's 3.00 GHz.

Q: How do these processors compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: Intel leads with a score of 8973, which is 9.3% higher than AMD's 8207. This matches the 9.3% delta seen across all Cinebench versions in the database.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 better at any compute task?

A: Yes, the data shows a decisive AMD win in data encryption, with a score of 8046 versus Intel's 3756. This represents a 53.3% advantage for AMD, the largest single benchmark gap in either direction.

Q: What is the difference in TDP between these two processors?

A: The Intel part has a 45 W TDP, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 is rated at 35 W. Despite the lower power envelope, AMD still trails in most raw performance tests.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i7-9750H does not. Both use DDR4 with dual-channel memory buses, but AMD offers a higher memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s versus Intel's 42.7 GB/s.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare to their nearest rivals?

A: The Intel i7-9750H has an average benchmark score of 14886, putting it 0.2% above the Intel Core i3-10320 and 0.9% below the Intel Core i3-1315U. The AMD V2546 averages 14336, which is 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U and 1.1% above the Intel Core i5-10400F. Both sit at the 69th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from fundamentally different design eras. The Intel Core i7-9750H uses the Coffee Lake architecture on a 14 nm process node, built by Intel's own foundry. It has a die size of 149 mm². The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 is based on Zen 2 (codenamed Renoir) and is manufactured on a 7 nm node by TSMC. AMD's die is slightly larger at 156 mm² but contains 9,800 million transistors, a figure Intel does not report for the i7-9750H.

Cache allocation differs notably. Both have 64 KB of L1 cache per core, but the L2 cache is 256 KB per core for Intel and 512 KB per core for AMD. The shared L3 cache favors Intel, with 12 MB versus AMD's 8 MB. This means Intel has a larger total cache pool for its six cores, while AMD compensates with more per-core L2.

Integrated graphics also tell a story of different design priorities. Intel includes the UHD 630 GPU in the mobile package, while AMD pairs the V2546 with Radeon Graphics with 384 shader processors. Neither benchmark set in the database tests graphics performance, so the comparison rests on the CPU-focused numbers.

Memory support shows another architectural divergence. Both parts support DDR4 and use dual-channel buses, but AMD's bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s versus Intel's 42.7 GB/s. AMD also includes ECC memory support, which Intel lacks. PCIe connectivity is Gen 3 for both, but AMD specifies 20 lanes from the CPU only, while Intel does not provide a lane count in the data.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are identical: 6 cores and 12 threads on both processors. The differences appear in clock speeds, power, socket, and process node. Intel lists a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, while AMD runs a 3.00 GHz base and 3.95 GHz boost. The AMD part has a lower TDP at 35 W versus Intel's 45 W.

Socket compatibility separates them completely. Intel uses BGA 1440, a mobile package, while AMD uses Socket FP6, which is a desktop-class embedded socket. The market segments reflect this: Intel is marked as "Mobile" and AMD as "Desktop" in the database.

The process node is a major differentiator: Intel is on 14 nm, AMD is on 7 nm. This explains the transistor density difference, though AMD's die is slightly larger at 156 mm² versus Intel's 149 mm². The production status also differs, with Intel listed as "End-of-life" and AMD as "Active."

Memory bandwidth favors AMD at 51.2 GB/s, and ECC support is exclusive to AMD. The L2 cache per core is double on AMD (512 KB versus 256 KB), but Intel's L3 cache is 50% larger (12 MB versus 8 MB). The release dates are nearly 19 months apart, with Intel launching on 2019-04-22 and AMD on 2020-11-09.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-9750H wins in every recorded CPU benchmark except data encryption. This includes all Cinebench versions, all Passmark integer, floating point, and multithread tests, single-thread performance, physics simulation, prime number finding, random string sorting, data compression, and extended instructions. The margins range from a modest 4.4% in extended instructions to a dominant 51.9% in physics.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 wins decisively in data encryption, with a 53.3% advantage over Intel. This is the only benchmark where AMD leads, but the margin is so large that it suggests a hardware-accelerated advantage for cryptographic workloads. Users running heavy AES encryption or VPN throughput tests would see a meaningful benefit from the AMD part.

Looking at the percentile data, both CPUs sit at the 69th percentile of all CPUs in the database, indicating they are directly comparable in overall standing. The average benchmark scores are close: 14886 for Intel and 14336 for AMD, a difference of about 3.8%. For general productivity, multi-threaded rendering, and single-thread responsiveness, the Intel chip is the clear choice. For embedded applications that prioritize encryption throughput and lower power consumption, the AMD part has a compelling niche.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear winner for general performance: the Intel Core i7-9750H. It leads in 16 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks, with consistent 9.3% advantages across the Cinebench suite and much larger margins in single-thread, physics, and string sorting tests. The 45 W TDP is higher than AMD's 35 W, but the performance return is substantial. Anyone who needs maximum CPU throughput in a mobile form factor should choose the Intel part.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 is the right pick when the workload involves heavy encryption. Its 53.3% lead in data encryption is the largest single benchmark gap in either direction, and it does so while drawing 10 W less power. The lower TDP, ECC memory support, and higher memory bandwidth make it attractive for embedded or server-adjacent deployments where reliability and security features matter more than raw compute speed.

Both processors are six-core, twelve-thread designs with similar overall standings in the database. The Intel chip is end-of-life, while AMD's is active production, which could matter for long-term availability. The decision comes down to workload: choose Intel for general performance, choose AMD for encryption-heavy tasks with lower power draw and ECC requirements.