CPU Comparison

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B and Intel Xeon E-2276M are two 45-watt processors aimed at very different corners of the market, yet their benchmark results tell a surprisingly one-sided story. The most striking finding from the head-to-head data is that the AMD part wins every single benchmark for which comparable scores exist, despite having fewer cores and threads. The V1807B’s 4-core/8-thread configuration consistently outperforms the Xeon’s 6-core/12-thread design across all Cinebench versions, with the margin holding remarkably steady at roughly 28.8% to 28.9% in every test. This is not a case of a narrow victory; it is a systematic performance advantage that persists from the older R15 workload to the newer R23.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench R15 multi-core test sets the tone: the Ryzen Embedded V1807B scores 701, while the Xeon E-2276M manages 544. That is a 28.9% lead for AMD, a substantial gap in a multi-threaded workload where the Intel part’s two extra cores would normally be expected to help. The single-core R15 results mirror this almost exactly, with the V1807B at 98 versus the Xeon’s 76, again a 28.9% advantage. The consistency of this margin suggests a fundamental architectural edge rather than a workload-specific quirk.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the pattern holds. The AMD chip scores 2921 in multi-core against 2268 for Intel, a 28.8% difference. In single-core R20, the numbers are 412 and 320, respectively, for the same 28.8% delta. The story repeats in Cinebench R23: 6957 versus 5400 in multi-core and 982 versus 762 in single-core, both showing a 28.8% to 28.9% lead for the Ryzen part. Across all six head-to-head comparisons, the V1807B wins every time, with zero wins recorded for the Xeon E-2276M.

It is importantly the Xeon has additional Geekbench scores in its benchmark list, 5159 multi-core and 1440 single-core, but the Ryzen has no corresponding Geekbench data in the benchmark database, so no direct comparison is possible there. What is clear from the Cinebench suite is that the V1807B’s lead is both large and uniform. The percentiles support this: the Ryzen sits at the 45th percentile of all CPUs, while the Xeon is just one point lower at the 44th percentile, but the average benchmark scores are close (2012 for AMD versus 1996 for Intel) because the Xeon’s Geekbench results pull its average up.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the benchmark data, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B wins every workload category tested. There is no single test in the head-to-head set where the Intel Xeon E-2276M comes out ahead. This means that for any Cinebench-based rendering or multi-threaded productivity task, the V1807B is the better performer by a consistent margin of roughly 29%. The single-core results are particularly telling because they show that AMD’s advantage is not just about thread management or multi-core scaling; the V1807B’s individual core performance is also superior in these tests.

That said, the Xeon E-2276M does have attributes that matter outside the benchmark suite. It supports ECC memory, which the Ryzen does not, and it has a higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz compared to 3.80 GHz for the AMD part. The Xeon also has a much larger L3 cache at 12 MB shared versus 2 MB shared for the Ryzen. However, none of these specification advantages translate into a win in the actual benchmark results. The Xeon’s integrated UHD Graphics P630 is present, but the Ryzen’s Radeon RX Vega 11 is a more capable iGPU on paper. For pure compute performance as measured by Cinebench, the verdict is unanimous: AMD takes every win.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies and generations. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B uses the Zen architecture, codenamed "Great Horned Owl," built on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It packs 4 cores and 8 threads with a base clock of 3.35 GHz and a boost of 3.80 GHz. The chip has 128 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 2 MB of shared L3 cache. It is built on a die size of 210 mm² with 4,950 million transistors. The integrated graphics are Radeon RX Vega 11, and the socket is AMD Socket FP5.

The Intel Xeon E-2276M uses the Coffee Lake architecture, specifically Coffee Lake-H, built on Intel’s own 14 nm process. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The cache hierarchy is different: 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and a much larger 12 MB of shared L3. The die is smaller at 154 mm², and no transistor count is listed. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics P630, and the socket is Intel BGA 1440.

A key difference is memory: both support DDR4 in dual-channel mode, but the Xeon lists a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, a figure that is absent for the Ryzen. The Xeon also supports ECC memory, while the AMD part does not. The Xeon’s PCIe configuration is listed as Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), whereas the Ryzen has no PCIe details provided. The Xeon is marked as end-of-life in production status, while the Ryzen is still active. The Xeon’s launch MSRP was $450, a figure stated once here; the Ryzen has no launch MSRP listed.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B scores 6957, while the Intel Xeon E-2276M scores 5400, giving AMD a 28.8% lead in that test.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon E-2276M win any benchmark in the head-to-head comparison?

A: No. The benchmark database shows the AMD V1807B winning all 6 head-to-head benchmarks, with 0 wins for the Intel part.

Q: What is the TDP of both processors?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B and the Intel Xeon E-2276M have a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2276M supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B does not.

Q: What are the core counts and thread counts?

A: The AMD V1807B has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel Xeon E-2276M has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How do their single-core Cinebench R20 scores compare?

A: The V1807B scores 412, and the Xeon E-2276M scores 320, a 28.8% advantage for AMD.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B | Intel Xeon E-2276M |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 6 |

| Threads | 8 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.35 GHz | 2.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.80 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP5 | Intel BGA 1440 |

| Architecture | Zen | Coffee Lake |

| Codename | Zen (Great Horned Owl) | Coffee Lake-H |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | Intel |

| Transistors | 4,950 million | Not listed |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | 154 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 2 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 42.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | False | True |

| PCIe | Not listed | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 | UHD Graphics P630 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Server/Workstation |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2018-02-20 | 2019-05-28 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $450 |

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B is the faster processor in every benchmark where a direct comparison exists. It beats the Intel Xeon E-2276M by roughly 29% in both single-core and multi-core Cinebench tests, from R15 through R23. This is despite having fewer cores and threads, which makes the result even more decisive. The V1807B’s architecture delivers superior performance per core and per thread in these workloads, and the fact that the margin is so consistent across all test versions indicates a stable, fundamental advantage.

For the user who prioritizes raw compute performance in Cinebench-style workloads, the AMD part is the clear choice. The Xeon E-2276M does not offer any performance advantage in the tested areas. However, the Xeon does bring ECC memory support, a feature the Ryzen lacks, and it has a higher boost clock and a larger L3 cache. It also supports more PCIe lanes, though the details are limited. If ECC memory is a hard requirement for a server or workstation build, the Xeon is the only option here, despite its lower benchmark scores.

The Xeon is also end-of-life, while the Ryzen is still active, which could matter for long-term availability. The Xeon’s launch MSRP was $450, but the Ryzen has no listed MSRP, so no cost comparison is possible. The Ryzen’s integrated Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics are likely more capable than the Xeon’s UHD Graphics P630 for any light graphical work, though no direct benchmark data exists in the pack. Ultimately, the verdict is simple: choose the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B for performance, and the Intel Xeon E-2276M only if you specifically need ECC memory or its particular socket and platform features.