AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B vs Intel Xeon D-1712TR Comparison

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B and Intel Xeon D-1712TR are both 4-core, 8-thread processors aimed at compact, always-on systems, but they come from radically different design philosophies. The data shows a remarkably tight contest across every benchmark, with the AMD part taking a narrow but consistent lead in all six Cinebench tests. Neither processor escapes the 45th percentile of all CPUs, placing them firmly in the entry-level performance tier, yet their architectural and platform differences tell a more interesting story than the raw scores suggest.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results paint a picture of near-identical performance, with AMD’s Ryzen Embedded V1807B winning every single head-to-head comparison by a razor-thin margin. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the V1807B scores 701 against the Xeon D-1712TR’s 698, a delta of just 0.4%. That pattern repeats in R20 multi-core, where AMD posts 2921 versus Intel’s 2911 (0.3% lead), and in R23 multi-core, where the scores are 6957 and 6931 respectively (0.4% lead). These are margins that would be imperceptible in real-world use, but they do establish a consistent trend.

Single-threaded performance tells the same story. In Cinebench R15 single-core, both chips tie at exactly 98 points, with the win awarded to AMD on a 0% delta. The gap opens slightly in R20 single-core, where the V1807B scores 412 against Intel’s 410, a 0.5% advantage. R23 single-core follows suit with 982 versus 978, another 0.4% lead for AMD. Across all six benchmarks, the largest margin is a mere 0.5%, and the average benchmark score reinforces the parity: AMD sits at 2012, just 0.4% ahead of Intel’s 2004.

The nearestRivals data puts both chips in the same performance neighborhood as mobile and desktop parts like the Intel Core i5-8300H and Core i5-8400H, with deltaPct values ranging from -0.1% to 0.4%. The V1807B’s closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 (2015 average score, -0.1% delta), while the Xeon D-1712TR’s nearest competitor is the Intel Core i5-8400H (2003 average, 0% delta). This indicates that despite their different market segments—one embedded desktop, the other server—both CPUs deliver comparable compute throughput to mainstream laptop and desktop chips from similar eras.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B wins every single benchmark in this comparison, but the margins are so small that neither chip can claim a decisive performance victory. The data shows AMD ahead by 0.3% to 0.5% in most tests, with a perfect tie in R15 single-core. That means for raw compute tasks—rendering, encoding, general productivity—the V1807B is technically the faster part, but the difference is within the noise of any benchmark run.

The Intel Xeon D-1712TR’s wins come not from Cinebench scores but from platform attributes. It supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the AMD part, making it the choice for data integrity in storage or networking appliances. It also offers triple-channel DDR4 memory with a rated bandwidth of 57.6 GB/s, whereas the AMD chip runs dual-channel without a published bandwidth figure. The Xeon’s PCIe Gen 4 interface with 16 lanes (CPU only) provides newer connectivity for high-speed peripherals, while the V1807B’s PCIe capabilities are not listed in the data.

For users prioritizing integrated graphics, the AMD part is the clear winner—it includes a Radeon RX Vega 11 iGPU, while the Intel chip has none listed. That makes the V1807B suitable for fanless or low-profile systems requiring display output without a discrete GPU. Conversely, the Xeon’s ECC and server-grade positioning target headless deployments where memory reliability outweighs graphics or single-thread speed.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent entirely different silicon generations and design goals. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B uses the Zen architecture, codenamed “Great Horned Owl,” built on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It packs 4,950 million transistors on a 210 mm² die, with a 45W TDP and a base clock of 3.35 GHz boosting to 3.80 GHz. Its cache hierarchy consists of 128 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and a modest 2 MB shared L3.

The Intel Xeon D-1712TR, by contrast, is based on the Ice Lake-D architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. It runs at a significantly lower base clock of 2.00 GHz, boosting to 3.10 GHz, but compensates with a larger cache layout: 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and a substantial 10 MB shared L3. The Xeon also carries a lower 40W TDP, despite being a server part, and uses the Intel BGA 2227 socket versus AMD’s FP5.

Memory support differs markedly. Both accept DDR4, but the Xeon uses a triple-channel bus with a rated 57.6 GB/s peak bandwidth, while the AMD part uses dual-channel with no bandwidth figure provided. ECC memory is supported only on the Intel side. The Xeon also brings PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), a feature absent from the AMD spec sheet. The AMD chip integrates a Radeon RX Vega 11 GPU; the Intel chip has no integrated graphics at all. Release dates are far apart—the V1807B launched in February 2018, the Xeon in February 2022—and the Xeon carries a launch MSRP of $263, while the AMD part has no listed MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B wins all multi-core Cinebench tests, but by margins under 0.5%. In R23 multi-core, it scores 6957 versus the Xeon’s 6931, a 0.4% lead.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon D-1712TR support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Xeon D-1712TR supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B does not list ECC support in its specifications.

Q: Can either processor handle graphics output without a discrete GPU?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B includes integrated graphics (Radeon RX Vega 11). The Intel Xeon D-1712TR has no integrated graphics listed.

Q: How do these chips compare to mainstream CPUs like the Intel Core i5-8300H?

A: Both are nearly identical to the i5-8300H. The AMD part has an average score of 2012 versus the i5-8300H’s 2005 (0.3% delta), and the Intel part scores 2004 versus 2005 (-0.1% delta).

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two?

A: The Xeon D-1712TR uses triple-channel DDR4 with a rated bandwidth of 57.6 GB/s. The AMD part uses dual-channel DDR4 but no bandwidth figure is provided in the data.

Q: Which chip has a newer PCIe interface?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1712TR supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B’s PCIe version is not listed.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B | Intel Xeon D-1712TR |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Zen | Ice Lake |

| Codename | Zen (Great Horned Owl) | Ice Lake-D |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | Intel |

| Transistors | 4,950 million | Not listed |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | Not listed |

| Base Clock | 3.35 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.80 GHz | 3.10 GHz |

| TDP | 45W | 40W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP5 | Intel BGA 2227 |

| L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 2 MB (shared) | 10 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Triple-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 57.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Not listed | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 | None |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Server/Workstation |

| Release Date | 2018-02-20 | 2022-02-23 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $263 |

| Part Number | Not listed | SRM1G |