AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Intel Core i7-10810U Comparison

# AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs Intel Core i7-10810U

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B and Intel Core i7-10810U are two very different processors that land in nearly the same performance tier despite their contrasting designs. The Ryzen Embedded is a 45W desktop-class part built on AMD's original Zen architecture, while the Core i7-10810U is a 25W mobile chip from Intel's Comet Lake generation. Across six Cinebench tests, the AMD chip wins every single one, but the margins are razor-thin—the largest advantage is just 1% in Cinebench R15 single-core. Both CPUs sit at the 44th percentile of all processors, and their average benchmark scores differ by only 15 points (1986 vs 1971). This is a matchup defined by parity, not dominance.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B sweeps all six head-to-head benchmark comparisons, yet the victory is almost entirely symbolic. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the AMD chip scores 692 against Intel's 686, a 0.9% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows the same pattern: 97 versus 96, a 1% edge. Moving to Cinebench R20, the AMD part posts 2884 multicore and 406 single-core, compared to Intel's 2862 and 404—deltas of 0.8% and 0.5%, respectively. The newest test, Cinebench R23, sees AMD at 6867 multicore and 969 single-core, while Intel manages 6816 and 962, yielding 0.7% gaps in both disciplines.

What makes these numbers notable is the hardware behind them. The Intel chip has 6 cores and 12 threads, a 50% core advantage over AMD's 4 cores and 8 threads. It also boosts to 4.90 GHz, far above AMD's 3.60 GHz ceiling. Yet the Ryzen Embedded still wins every workload. This suggests that AMD's Zen architecture, despite being older and having fewer cores, extracts more useful work per clock in these Cinebench scenarios. The differences are within run-to-run noise territory, but the consistency of AMD's victory across three Cinebench versions and both single- and multi-threaded tests is worth noting.

The average benchmark scores reinforce the closeness: AMD's 1986 average places it just 1 point behind the Intel Core i5-8279U (1987) and 3 points behind the Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 (1991). Intel's 1971 average sits 2 points behind the Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 (1973) and 3 points ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 2600H (1967). In terms of nearest rivals, the AMD chip's closest competitors are Intel Xeon parts and the Ryzen 5 1500X, all within 0.3% of its score. The Intel chip's rivals include the Ryzen 3 2300X and Core i5-7600K, again all within 0.3%. Neither chip has any meaningful separation from its peer group.

Architecture Differences

The architectural chasm between these two chips is vast. AMD's Ryzen Embedded V1756B uses the original Zen architecture, fabricated on a 14nm process at GlobalFoundries. The chip packs 4,950 million transistors into a 210 mm² die. Intel's Core i7-10810U uses the Comet Lake architecture, also on a 14nm node but built at Intel's own fabs; transistor count and die size are not disclosed in the data.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The AMD chip offers 128 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with 2 MB of shared L3. Intel's part has less L1 (64 KB per core) and L2 (256 KB per core) but a much larger 12 MB shared L3 cache—six times AMD's L3 allocation. That large cache likely helps Intel close the gap despite its lower per-core efficiency.

Memory support shows another split. The Ryzen Embedded supports DDR4 only, while the Core i7-10810U supports both DDR3 and DDR4. Both run dual-channel memory buses. Neither chip supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Integrated graphics differentiate them as well. AMD includes Radeon Vega 8 graphics, while Intel ships UHD Graphics. The AMD part is a desktop-market chip using AMD Socket FP5, whereas Intel's is a mobile part on Intel BGA 1440. The Intel chip also lists PCIe Gen 3 support, while AMD's PCIe configuration is not specified.

Production status separates them further: AMD's chip is still active, while Intel's is end-of-life. The release dates show a two-year gap—AMD launched in February 2018, Intel in April 2020. The Intel part belongs to the Core 10th Gen family under the Comet Lake-U codename, while AMD's is from the 1000 series under the "Great Horned Owl" codename.

The Verdict

From the data alone, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B is the marginally faster processor. It wins all six Cinebench comparisons, albeit by less than 1% in each case. For workloads that rely on Cinebench-style rendering performance, the AMD chip has a slight edge that is unlikely to be perceptible in real-world use. It also remains in active production, making it a viable choice for current system builds.

The Intel Core i7-10810U offers a different set of advantages that are not visible in raw scores. Its 6-core/12-thread configuration provides more parallel headroom, which could matter in multi-threaded applications that scale beyond what Cinebench captures. The 12 MB L3 cache is significantly larger, potentially benefiting workloads with high cache reuse. Its mobile segment designation and 25W TDP suggest it belongs in laptops, whereas AMD's 45W part targets desktop or embedded systems.

Who should pick which? If the requirement is a currently available, slightly faster processor for Cinebench-style tasks, the Ryzen Embedded V1756B is the choice. If the requirement is a mobile platform with more cores, a higher boost clock, and a much larger cache, the Core i7-10810U has structural advantages despite losing every benchmark. The Intel part's end-of-life status is a strike against it for new designs, however. For systems where power efficiency matters, the Intel chip's 25W TDP versus AMD's 45W TDP is a significant differentiator.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B | Intel Core i7-10810U |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 6 |

| Threads | 8 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.25 GHz | 1100.00 MHz (1.10 GHz) |

| Boost Clock | 3.60 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 25 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP5 | Intel BGA 1440 |

| Architecture | Zen | Comet Lake |

| Process Node | 14 nm (GlobalFoundries) | 14 nm (Intel) |

| L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 2 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR3, DDR4 |

| PCIe | Not specified | Gen 3 |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 | UHD Graphics |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | February 2018 | April 2020 |

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the most benchmark comparisons?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B wins all six head-to-head Cinebench tests, with deltas ranging from 0.5% in R20 single-core to 1% in R15 single-core.

Q: How much faster is the AMD chip in multi-core workloads?

A: The AMD chip leads by 0.9% in Cinebench R15 multicore (692 vs 686), 0.8% in R20 multicore (2884 vs 2862), and 0.7% in R23 multicore (6867 vs 6816).

Q: Does the Intel chip have more cores?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-10810U has 6 cores and 12 threads, compared to 4 cores and 8 threads on the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD chip has a 45W TDP, while the Intel chip has a 25W TDP.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-10810U has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, six times the 2 MB shared L3 on the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B.

Q: Are both processors still in production?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1756B is listed as active, while the Intel Core i7-10810U is end-of-life.