AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows that this comparison is limited by the absence of benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D. The itemA entry contains an empty benchmarks array, and the headToHeadBenchmarks field is also empty. Consequently, the database has no direct scores for the AMD part, and the winsA and winsB counters both register zero. The analysis below therefore relies entirely on the benchmark profile of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H and the structural specifications of both processors.

For the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, the database provides a comprehensive set of scores. In Cinebench R23, the multicore result is 20781.5 points, while the singlecore result is 2129.5 points. These figures indicate a strong balance between threaded and single-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R20 results follow a similar pattern, with a multicore score of 12201 and a singlecore score of 1722. In the older Cinebench R15 test, the multicore score is 3177.5, and the singlecore score is 313.

Geekbench results for the Intel part show a multicore score of 14743 and a singlecore score of 2178. The PassMark suite adds further detail. The multithread score is 34171, and the singlethread score is 4415 (also recorded as passmark_single_thread with the same value). In specific PassMark workloads, the data shows integer math at 85922, floating point math at 109190, extended instructions at 26794, data compression at 335859, data encryption at 26140, physics at 2513, random string sorting at 40931, and find prime numbers at 330.

Since the AMD processor has no recorded scores, there are no direct wins to attribute to either side. The data indicates that the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H occupies an 86th percentile rank among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38312. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core 9 270H with an average score of 38335 and a delta of -0.1 percent, the Intel Core i5-13600HX with 38261 and a delta of 0.1 percent, the Intel Xeon w3-2525 with 38392 and a delta of -0.2 percent, and the AMD Ryzen 7 250 with 38221 and a delta of 0.2 percent. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the Intel part sits in a tightly grouped performance band.

For the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D, the database records a percentile rank of 50 among all CPUs, but its average benchmark score is zero due to the missing data. This percentile value cannot be interpreted as a performance measurement without corresponding scores. The absence of benchmark data means that any quantitative comparison between the two processors is impossible from the recorded numbers.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the available data, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is the only processor with measurable performance, so it wins every recorded benchmark category by default. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20781.5 indicates strong capability in rendering and heavily threaded tasks. The Geekbench multicore score of 14743 reinforces this pattern. Single-thread performance, as shown by the Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 2129.5 and the Geekbench singlecore score of 2178, suggests solid responsiveness in lightly threaded applications.

Within the PassMark suite, the Intel part shows particular strength in data compression with a score of 335859, which is substantially higher than its integer math score of 85922 and floating point math score of 109190. The data encryption score of 26140 and the extended instructions score of 26794 are also recorded. The physics score of 2513 and the find prime numbers score of 330 are lower in absolute terms but still represent specific workload measurements.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has no recorded wins because it has no recorded scores. The database does, however, show structural advantages that could translate to performance in certain scenarios. The AMD part has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel part has 16 cores and 16 threads. This means the AMD processor has twice the thread count, which could benefit heavily parallel workloads if benchmark data were available. The AMD part also has a larger L3 cache at 128 MB compared to 24 MB for the Intel part, which could improve performance in cache-sensitive tasks.

The AMD processor has a higher base clock of 4.30 GHz and a higher boost clock of 5.70 GHz, compared to the Intel base clock of 2.90 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz. These clock differences suggest that the AMD part may have an advantage in frequency-bound workloads, but the database does not contain scores to confirm this. The Intel part has a higher memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s compared to 89.6 GB/s for the AMD part, which could favor the Intel processor in memory-intensive operations.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear but incomplete picture. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is the only processor with benchmark scores in the database, and its performance is well characterized. Its average benchmark score of 38312 places it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.2 percent of its score, indicating a competitive position in its class. The Intel part also has a recorded launch MSRP of $651, which can be stated once.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has no benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of zero, and a 50th percentile rank that cannot be validated without data. The database does not provide enough information to determine whether the AMD processor would outperform the Intel part in any workload. The structural differences, including the higher thread count, larger L3 cache, and higher clock speeds, suggest potential advantages, but these remain unconfirmed by measurements.

For users who require verified performance data, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is the only processor with measurable results in this comparison. Its recorded scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark provide a comprehensive view of its capabilities. The AMD processor cannot be recommended or rejected on the basis of the current database, as no benchmark results exist for it.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D?

A: The database records an average benchmark score of 0 for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D, as no individual benchmark scores are listed.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H has an average benchmark score of 38312, based on its recorded Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark results.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel part is within 0.2 percent of its nearest rivals. It trails the Intel Core 9 270H by 0.1 percent, trails the Intel Xeon w3-2525 by 0.2 percent, leads the Intel Core i5-13600HX by 0.1 percent, and leads the AMD Ryzen 7 250 by 0.2 percent.

Q: What is the thread count difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H has 16 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has 128 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the boost clock for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers and target different market segments. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D is a desktop processor from the 9000 series, built on the Granite Ridge codename with the Zen 5 microarchitecture. Its generation is listed as "Ryzen Embedded (Zen 5 (Granite Ridge))". The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is a mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture with the Arrow Lake-H codename. Its generation is listed as "Ultra 9 (Arrow Lake-H)".

The process nodes differ. The AMD part uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 3 nm process from TSMC. The AMD processor is fabricated with 16,630 million transistors on a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The Intel processor has no transistor count or die size recorded in the database.

Cache structures are substantially different. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 128 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD processor's L3 cache is more than five times larger, while the Intel processor has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches.

The integrated graphics also differ. The AMD part uses Radeon Graphics, while the Intel part uses Arc Graphics 140T. Both processors support ECC memory, but the memory support differs: the AMD part supports DDR5, while the Intel part supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but the Intel part has a higher memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s compared to 89.6 GB/s for the AMD part.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The AMD processor offers Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The AMD multiplier is unlocked, while the Intel multiplier is locked.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H differ on several recorded specifications. The AMD part has a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, while the Intel part has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The TDP values are very different: the AMD part is rated at 170 watts, and the Intel part is rated at 45 watts. The AMD part uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 2049.

The thread counts differ, as noted: the AMD part has 32 threads, and the Intel part has 16 threads, despite both having 16 cores. The L3 cache sizes differ, with the AMD part at 128 MB and the Intel part at 24 MB. The memory bandwidth differs, with the Intel part at 102.4 GB/s and the AMD part at 89.6 GB/s. The PCIe lane counts differ, with the AMD part at 24 lanes and the Intel part at 8 lanes.

The release dates differ. The AMD processor has a release date of 2025-10-06, while the Intel processor has a release date of 2025-01-12. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $651, while the AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded. The part numbers also differ: the AMD part is 100-000000719E, and the Intel part is SRQAL. The production status for both is listed as active.