AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D vs Intel Core i5-14401E Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits cleanly by workload type. The Intel Core i5-14401E has recorded Cinebench scores across R15, R20, and R23, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has no recorded benchmark entries in the database. This means the Intel part wins every direct comparison by default, but the nature of its wins matters more than the raw counts.

The Core i5-14401E shows its strength in multi-threaded rendering. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,161 points represents a substantial throughput advantage for heavily parallel workloads. The single-core R23 result of 2,564 points also confirms solid per-thread performance for lighter tasks that depend on one or two cores.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D presents a different profile entirely. With 16 cores and 32 threads against the Intel part's 6 cores and 12 threads, the AMD chip offers more than double the thread count. The Intel processor compensates with higher per-core efficiency in the recorded tests, but the database contains no measured scores for the AMD part, so its actual benchmark behavior remains unquantified.

For users prioritizing measured, verifiable performance in the Cinebench suite, the Core i5-14401E is the only option with data. For those who need massive core counts for parallel workloads, the Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D's 16-core configuration provides structural advantages that the 6-core Intel chip cannot match, even without recorded scores.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D uses the Granite Ridge codename and belongs to the Zen 5 generation, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14401E uses the Raptor Lake-R codename, belongs to the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, and is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process.

The transistor counts highlight the scale difference. The AMD chip contains 16,630 million transistors spread across a dual-die design with each die measuring 70.6 mm². The Intel chip's die size is 215 mm², but the database does not list its transistor count. This structural difference reflects the AMD part's dual-chiplet approach versus Intel's monolithic die.

Cache hierarchies diverge significantly. Both processors share 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the L2 configuration differs: AMD uses 1 MB per core, while Intel uses 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache presents the largest gap. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D carries 128 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has 20 MB shared. This 108 MB difference is the most dramatic architectural distinction, giving AMD a massive advantage for data-heavy workloads that benefit from large on-chip caches.

Memory support also differs. AMD supports DDR5 only with dual-channel memory and a listed bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory, though its bandwidth is not recorded in the database. Both support ECC memory, which suits embedded and workstation applications.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. AMD provides Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics are present on both: AMD uses Radeon Graphics, Intel uses UHD Graphics 730.

Clock speeds show a mixed picture. The AMD part has a 4.30 GHz base clock and 5.70 GHz boost clock. The Intel part has a 2.50 GHz base clock and 4.70 GHz boost clock. The AMD chip is unlocked for overclocking, while the Intel chip has a locked multiplier.

The power envelope differs substantially. The AMD processor has a 170 W TDP, while the Intel processor has a 65 W TDP. This 105 W difference indicates that the AMD part targets maximum performance at higher power consumption, while the Intel part emphasizes efficiency and lower thermal output.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD part provides more than double the thread count.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D boosts to 5.70 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14401E boosts to 4.70 GHz. The AMD part has a 1.00 GHz higher boost clock.

Q: How does the L3 cache compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has 128 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has 20 MB shared. The AMD part offers 108 MB more L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D and the Intel Core i5-14401E support ECC memory.

Q: What sockets do these processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel Core i5-14401E uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What are the recorded Cinebench R23 scores for the Intel processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E records a multi-core score of 18,161 and a single-core score of 2,564 in Cinebench R23. No Cinebench scores are recorded for the AMD processor.

Specification Differences

The table below shows the fields where the two processors differ:

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D | Intel Core i5-14401E |

|---------------|---------------------------|---------------------|

| Cores | 16 | 6 |

| Threads | 32 | 12 |

| Base clock | 4.30 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.70 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 170 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Granite Ridge | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Zen 5 (Granite Ridge) | Raptor Lake Refresh |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 16,630 million | Not listed |

| Die size | 2x 70.6 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 128 MB | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| PCIe lanes | Gen 5, 24 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Multiplier | Unlocked | Locked |

| Release date | 2025-10-06 | 2024-06-30 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records six Cinebench measurements for the Intel Core i5-14401E and none for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D. The head-to-head comparison therefore reflects only the Intel part's measured performance, with the AMD part's scores absent from the records.

In Cinebench R15, the Intel processor scores 1,830 in multi-core and 258 in single-core. These results establish a baseline for the older R15 rendering workload. The multi-core to single-core ratio of approximately 7.1 indicates strong scaling across its 6 cores and 12 threads.

Cinebench R20 shows the Intel part at 7,627 in multi-core and 1,076 in single-core. The multi-core score improves by roughly 4.2 times over the R15 multi-core result, reflecting the heavier workload demands of R20. The single-core score scales proportionally, indicating consistent per-thread performance across benchmark generations.

Cinebench R23 delivers the most recent and demanding results. The Intel processor records 18,161 in multi-core and 2,564 in single-core. The multi-core score represents a 2.4 times increase over the R20 multi-core result, while the single-core score shows a 2.4 times increase over R20 single-core. This consistent scaling demonstrates that the Intel chip maintains its efficiency profile as workload intensity grows.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50 among all CPUs, indicating no recorded measurements. The Intel Core i5-14401E has an average benchmark score of 5,253 and a percentile rank of 60, placing it above the median.

The Intel part's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its average score. The Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 scores 5,259, which is 0.1% higher. The Intel Core i7-11700B scores 5,241, which is 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i9-10850K scores 5,240, also 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i5-13400T scores 5,210, which is 0.8% lower. These narrow deltas indicate that the Core i5-14401E sits in a tightly contested performance band.

Without recorded scores for the AMD processor, direct numerical comparison is impossible. However, the structural specifications suggest a clear division: the AMD part offers 10 more cores, 20 more threads, a 1.00 GHz higher boost clock, and 108 MB more L3 cache, while the Intel part operates at a 105 W lower TDP. The AMD processor's higher core count and cache capacity position it for heavily parallel and cache-sensitive workloads, while the Intel processor's recorded scores confirm its capability in the Cinebench suite with substantially lower power requirements.