AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D vs Intel Core Ultra 7 268V Comparison

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D and the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V occupy different corners of the processor market. The AMD part is a 16-core, 32-thread desktop processor built for high-throughput workloads, while the Intel chip is an 8-core, 8-thread mobile processor designed for efficiency. The recorded data shows a clear split: the AMD chip dominates multi-threaded tasks, while the Intel chip holds a lead in several single-threaded and specialized workloads. Neither processor has a head-to-head benchmark entry in the database, so the comparison relies on the available benchmark scores for the Intel part and the architectural specifications for the AMD part.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V has a full set of benchmark results in the database, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has no recorded benchmark scores. This means the comparison is asymmetric: the Intel chip shows measurable performance across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark, while the AMD chip must be assessed through its core configuration, clock speeds, and cache layout.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10653 and a single-core score of 1921. The multi-core result places it above the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE, which has an average score of 20900 in the database, but the Intel chip’s own average benchmark score is 20897, putting it within a fraction of that rival. The nearest rival data shows the Intel chip is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE, which has a delta of 0 percent, and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i5-12600T, which trails by 0.1 percent. The AMD EPYC 7J13 sits 0.2 percent behind, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U is 0.3 percent behind. These margins are tiny, indicating that the Core Ultra 7 268V sits in a dense performance cluster.

The Intel chip’s Geekbench scores are 9963 for multi-core and 2270 for single-core. The Passmark suite shows a multithread score of 19297 and a single-thread score of 4051. The floating-point math test records 57628, while integer math reaches 42669. The data compression test produces 181443, and data encryption records 13779. Extended instructions score 15323, find prime numbers delivers 192, physics scores 1617, and random string sorting reaches 22416.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D, by contrast, has no benchmark entries, so its performance cannot be compared directly through measured scores. What the database does show is its structural advantage: 16 cores and 32 threads, a base clock of 4.30 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The Intel chip has 8 cores and 8 threads, a base clock of 2.20 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The AMD chip’s thread count is four times higher, and its boost clock is 0.70 GHz higher. In multi-threaded workloads that scale with core and thread counts, the AMD part should produce substantially higher throughput, but the database does not provide a measured score to quantify that advantage.

The Intel chip’s single-core results are strong. The Cinebench R15 single-core score is 293, the R20 single-core score is 972, and the R23 single-core score is 1921. The Geekbench single-core score is 2270. These numbers, combined with a Passmark single-thread score of 4051, indicate that the Intel part handles lightly threaded tasks efficiently. The AMD chip’s higher boost clock of 5.70 GHz suggests it could match or exceed these single-core results, but again, no measured data exists for the AMD part in the database.

The Intel chip’s average benchmark score is 20897, and its percentile ranking among all CPUs is 74. This means it performs better than 74 percent of all processors in the database. The AMD chip has a percentile ranking of 50, which means it sits at the median of the database, but this ranking is based on an average benchmark score of 0, which reflects the absence of recorded benchmarks rather than actual performance. The percentile field for the AMD part cannot be interpreted as a true performance indicator because the underlying score is zero.

The nearest rival data for the Intel chip provides context. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE has an average score of 20900, which is essentially identical to the Intel chip’s 20897. The Intel Core i5-12600T scores 20917, a 0.1 percent advantage over the Core Ultra 7 268V. The AMD EPYC 7J13 scores 20845, a 0.2 percent deficit, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U scores 20826, a 0.3 percent deficit. These rivals are all close, but the Core Ultra 7 268V edges out the EPYC and the Core Ultra 5, while trailing the Core i5-12600T by a negligible amount.

The data shows that the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V is a mid-pack performer in the database’s overall ranking, with its percentile of 74 indicating it sits above the majority of CPUs. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D, despite having no benchmark scores, has the structural specifications of a high-core-count desktop part. The difference in thread counts, 32 versus 8, is the most significant factor in any multi-threaded comparison.

The Verdict

The database presents two very different products. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor with a 170 W TDP, a 5.70 GHz boost clock, and 128 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V is an 8-core, 8-thread mobile processor with a 17 W TDP, a 5.00 GHz boost clock, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The TDP difference is stark: 170 W versus 17 W, a factor of ten. This alone defines their intended use cases.

For multi-threaded workloads, the AMD chip’s configuration is the obvious choice based on the recorded specifications. With 16 cores and 32 threads, it has four times the thread count of the Intel chip. The L3 cache is also massively larger: 128 MB versus 12 MB. The AMD chip supports ECC memory, while the Intel chip does not. The AMD chip also offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, while the Intel chip provides PCIe Gen 5 with only 4 lanes. These factors point to a processor designed for server, embedded, and workstation tasks where core counts and memory reliability matter.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, on the other hand, has measured benchmark scores that place it at the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its single-core scores are solid, and its Passmark single-thread score of 4051 shows it handles lightly threaded tasks well. Its average benchmark score of 20897 puts it in the same performance tier as the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE, the Intel Core i5-12600T, the AMD EPYC 7J13, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U. For a mobile processor with a 17 W TDP, this is a competitive position.

The choice between the two depends on the workload. The AMD chip is for scenarios that require massive parallelism, large cache, ECC support, and extensive PCIe lanes. The Intel chip is for mobile or low-power environments where its measured performance is sufficient and its power draw is minimal. The database shows no benchmark overlap, so there is no direct performance comparison. The structural data, however, makes the division clear.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V has 8 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the boost clocks of the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V support ECC memory?

A: No. The database lists ECC memory support as false for the Intel chip. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has 128 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has a TDP of 170 W. The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V has a TDP of 17 W.

Q: What is the Intel chip’s percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V ranks at the 74th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 20897.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D uses 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V uses 8 cores and 8 threads. The AMD base clock is 4.30 GHz, and the Intel base clock is 2.20 GHz. The AMD boost clock is 5.70 GHz, and the Intel boost clock is 5.00 GHz. The AMD TDP is 170 W, and the Intel TDP is 17 W.

The sockets differ: the AMD chip uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel chip uses Intel BGA 2833. The AMD chip has a multiplier that is unlocked, while the Intel chip’s multiplier is locked. The AMD chip has a part number of 100-000000719E, and the Intel chip has a part number of SRPMLSRPMX.

The cache configurations are different. The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core. The Intel chip has 192 KB of L1 cache per core and 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core. The L3 cache is 128 MB on the AMD chip and 12 MB shared on the Intel chip.

The memory support differs. The AMD chip supports DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip’s memory support is listed as dependent on the motherboard, with a dual-channel memory bus and no recorded bandwidth. The AMD chip supports ECC memory, and the Intel chip does not.

The PCIe configurations differ. The AMD chip provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, while the Intel chip provides PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes. The integrated graphics differ: the AMD chip uses Radeon Graphics, and the Intel chip uses Arc 140V.

The release dates differ. The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V was released on 2024-09-23, and the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D was released on 2025-10-06.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC. The transistor count is 16,630 million, and the die size is listed as 2x 70.6 mm². The processor belongs to the 9000 series and the Ryzen Embedded generation, specifically Zen 5 (Granite Ridge).

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V is built on the Lunar Lake architecture, which is also the codename. It uses a 3 nm process node from TSMC. The database does not list a transistor count or die size for the Intel chip. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 and the Ultra 7 generation, specifically Lunar Lake.

The AMD chip’s L3 cache of 128 MB is a defining feature, far exceeding the Intel chip’s 12 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches, but the AMD chip’s total cache capacity is larger. The AMD chip supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the Intel chip. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel chip is locked.

The process nodes differ: the AMD chip uses 4 nm, and the Intel chip uses 3 nm. Both are fabricated by TSMC. The AMD chip has a dual-die design, as indicated by the 2x 70.6 mm² die size, while the Intel chip’s die size is not recorded.

The market segments differ. The AMD chip is listed as a desktop processor, and the Intel chip is listed as a mobile processor. Both are marked as active in production status. The AMD chip’s release date is later, and its specifications point to a high-power, high-throughput design. The Intel chip’s specifications point to a low-power, mobile-focused design.