AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D vs Intel Core Ultra 7 256V Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D and the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V has 8 cores and 8 threads.

Q: How do the base and boost clocks compare between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: What are the thermal design power (TDP) ratings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has a TDP of 170 watts. The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V has a TDP of 17 watts.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has a 128 MB L3 cache. The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V has a 12 MB shared L3 cache.

Q: What process nodes are used for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V uses a 3 nm process node, also from TSMC.

Q: What is the average benchmark score and percentile ranking for the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V has an average benchmark score of 21112 and ranks in the 75th percentile against all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has an average benchmark score of 0 and ranks in the 50th percentile.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents a clear split between the two processors based on workload and platform. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D is a desktop-class chip with 16 cores, 32 threads, a 170 W TDP, and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. It is designed for heavy multi-threaded tasks where raw throughput and large cache capacity matter. The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V is a mobile chip with 8 cores, 8 threads, a 17 W TDP, and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Its average benchmark score of 21112 places it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs, while its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, show delta percentages of -0.1% and -0.3% respectively, indicating a near-tie in overall performance.

For users who prioritize extreme multi-threading, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D’s core count and thread count make it the appropriate choice. For users who need a low-power, mobile processor with competitive single-thread performance and a small footprint, the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V is the practical option. The benchmark data for the Intel chip shows strong scores in single-thread tests, such as a PassMark single-thread score of 4029 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1877.5. The AMD chip, however, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its performance cannot be directly quantified here. The selection should be based on platform and power requirements: the AMD chip requires a socketed AM5 motherboard, while the Intel chip is a BGA 2833 mobile part. Neither processor has a launch MSRP listed in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains benchmark results for the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V but no benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D. Therefore, the head-to-head comparison relies exclusively on the Intel chip’s recorded measurements and its position relative to other processors.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10399 and a single-core score of 1877.5. In Geekbench, it scores 8643 in multi-core and 1990 in single-core. PassMark tests show a multi-thread score of 19530 and a single-thread score of 4029. These figures indicate a balanced mobile processor. Its percentile ranking of 75% against all CPUs confirms that it outperforms a majority of recorded processors.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V are the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Ryzen 5 5600G, Intel Core i3-1220P, and Intel Core Ultra 7 155U. The delta percentages are -0.1%, +0.1%, +0.2%, and -0.3% respectively. This means the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V effectively matches these chips in average score, with differences of less than one percent. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155U trails by 0.3%, while the Intel Core i3-1220P leads by 0.2%. These narrow margins show that the 256V sits in a competitive cluster of mid-range processors.

Without recorded benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D, no direct wins can be allocated. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero. The analysis must note that the AMD chip’s performance is unmeasured in this database, so any head-to-head claims would be speculative. The Intel chip’s data confirms it is a capable performer in its segment, especially in single-threaded workloads where it scores near the top of its class.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every fundamental specification. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D uses 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V uses 8 cores and 8 threads. The AMD chip has a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, compared to the Intel chip’s base clock of 2.20 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

The TDP ratings diverge sharply: 170 watts for the AMD chip versus 17 watts for the Intel chip. The AMD chip is a desktop processor on AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel chip is a mobile processor on Intel BGA 2833. The AMD chip supports ECC memory, while the Intel chip does not. The AMD chip has 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip has 4 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only). The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel chip does not.

The integrated graphics differ: the AMD chip uses Radeon Graphics, while the Intel chip uses Arc 140V. The AMD chip’s memory bandwidth is listed as 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel chip’s memory bandwidth is not recorded. The AMD chip’s memory support is DDR5, while the Intel chip’s memory support is listed as “unknown” and depends on the motherboard. The release dates also differ: the AMD chip was released on 2025-10-06, while the Intel chip was released on 2024-09-23.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D belongs to the 9000 series and uses the Granite Ridge codename, with a generation labeled “Ryzen Embedded (Zen 5 (Granite Ridge))”. The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 and uses the Lunar Lake codename, with a generation labeled “Ultra 7 (Lunar Lake)”. Both chips are manufactured by TSMC, but on different process nodes: the AMD chip uses 4 nm, while the Intel chip uses 3 nm.

The cache hierarchies are structurally distinct. The AMD chip has an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, an L2 cache of 1 MB per core, and an L3 cache of 128 MB. The Intel chip has an L1 cache of 192 KB per core, an L2 cache of 2.5 MB per core, and an L3 cache of 12 MB shared. The AMD chip’s large L3 cache is typical of its design philosophy, while the Intel chip’s smaller shared L3 cache reflects a different balance between cache and power efficiency.

The transistor count and die size are recorded for the AMD chip: 16,630 million transistors and a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The Intel chip has no transistor count or die size recorded in the database. The AMD chip’s process node is 4 nm, and the Intel chip’s process node is 3 nm. Both use TSMC as the foundry.

The market segments differ: the AMD chip is listed as “Desktop”, while the Intel chip is listed as “Mobile”. This aligns with the socket types, power envelopes, and integrated graphics choices. The AMD chip’s Radeon Graphics and the Intel chip’s Arc 140V both provide integrated graphics, but the Intel chip’s Arc branding suggests a focus on mobile visual performance. The production status for both is “Active”.

The AMD chip’s generation explicitly mentions Zen 5 architecture, while the Intel chip’s generation mentions Lunar Lake architecture. The AMD chip has a part number of 100-000000719E, and the Intel chip has a part number of SRPMPSRPMZ. The AMD chip’s release date is later than the Intel chip’s release date by approximately one year. These architectural differences explain the divergent specifications and target use cases.