AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark scores between the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T. The Intel part has a full set of recorded measurements, while the AMD part has no benchmark entries in the database. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D shows an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50 against all CPUs, which reflects the absence of tested workloads rather than a literal performance null. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, by contrast, carries an average benchmark score of 38194 and sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs.

For the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, the recorded data shows a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 and a single-core score of 3699. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 11007 and the single-core result is 1553. The older Cinebench R15 test yields 2641 multi-core and 372 single-core. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 30833, a single-thread score of 4367, integer math at 88676, floating-point math at 108499, data compression at 283812, data encryption at 23656, extended instructions at 22071, find prime numbers at 324, physics at 2278, and random string sorting at 34931.

Since the AMD part has no recorded scores, the head-to-head comparison cannot be quantified directly. The nearest rivals for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T provide context for its standing. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221, which is 0.1% below the Intel part. The Intel Core i5-14490F scores 38149, 0.1% above. The Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38261, 0.2% below. The Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38103, 0.2% above. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the Core Ultra 5 245T sits in a tightly clustered performance band among its nearest competitors.

Where Each One Wins

Without benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D, the data cannot show any direct wins for that processor. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, however, demonstrates clear strengths across every recorded workload category. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 indicates strong parallel processing capability, while the single-core score of 3699 reflects solid per-thread performance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30833 and single-thread score of 4367 reinforce this pattern.

The Intel part's data compression score of 283812 is notably high, suggesting efficient handling of compression workloads. The floating-point math score of 108499 exceeds the integer math score of 88676, which implies the architecture favors floating-point operations. The extended instructions score of 22071 and encryption score of 23656 show capable SIMD and cryptographic processing. The random string sorting score of 34931 and physics score of 2278 round out the recorded picture.

For the AMD side, the only available facts are architectural. The processor has 16 cores and 32 threads, compared to the Intel part's 14 cores and 14 threads. The AMD base clock of 4.30 GHz and boost clock of 5.70 GHz exceed the Intel part's 2.20 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost. The AMD L3 cache of 128 MB dwarfs the Intel L3 cache of 24 MB. These specifications suggest the AMD part could win in scenarios requiring high thread counts and large cache footprints, but the database contains no measured scores to confirm such wins.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D have any recorded benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The AMD part has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of 0, and a percentile rank of 50. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T has 17 recorded scores across Cinebench and PassMark tests.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The Intel part scores 38194 on average. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 is 0.1% lower at 38221, the Intel Core i5-14490F is 0.1% higher at 38149, the Intel Core i5-13600HX is 0.2% lower at 38261, and the Intel Core i5-13600KF is 0.2% higher at 38103.

Q: What is the single-thread performance of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T?

A: The PassMark single-thread score is 4367, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score is 3699. The Cinebench R20 single-core score is 1553, and the Cinebench R15 single-core score is 372.

Q: What is the multi-thread performance of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T?

A: The PassMark multi-thread score is 30833. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 26208, the Cinebench R20 multi-core score is 11007, and the Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 2641.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T has 14 cores and 14 threads. The AMD part's thread count is more than double the Intel part's.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D is built on a 4 nm process, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is built on a 3 nm process. Both are manufactured by TSMC.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T has 14 cores and 14 threads. The AMD base clock is 4.30 GHz versus the Intel base clock of 2.20 GHz. The AMD boost clock is 5.70 GHz versus the Intel boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The AMD TDP is 170 watts, while the Intel TDP is 65 watts.

The sockets differ completely. The AMD part uses AMD Socket AM5, and the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1851. The AMD multiplier is unlocked, while the Intel multiplier is locked. The integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD part uses Radeon Graphics, and the Intel part uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU. The PCIe lanes differ, with 24 lanes on the AMD part and 20 lanes on the Intel part, both Gen 5. The memory bandwidth also differs: the AMD part supports 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part supports 102.4 GB/s.

The release dates differ significantly. The AMD part was released on October 6, 2025, while the Intel part was released on January 6, 2025. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $270, which is stated once here as a factual data point. The AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded. The part numbers differ: the AMD part is 100-000000719E, and the Intel part is SRVFF.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D belongs to the 9000 series under the codename Granite Ridge, with a generation labeled as Ryzen Embedded (Zen 5 (Granite Ridge)). The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 under the codename Arrow Lake-S, with a generation labeled as Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake). The Intel part has an explicit architecture field of Arrow Lake, while the AMD part lists no architecture value.

The process nodes differ: the AMD part uses a 4 nm node, and the Intel part uses a 3 nm node, both from TSMC. The transistor counts are close but not identical: the AMD part has 16,630 million transistors, and the Intel part has 17,800 million transistors. The die sizes diverge sharply: the AMD part has a die size of 2x 70.6 mm², and the Intel part has a die size of 243 mm².

The cache hierarchies are structurally different. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 128 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD L3 cache is more than five times larger than the Intel L3 cache. Both support DDR5 memory with dual-channel buses and ECC memory. The AMD part has a lower memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s compared to the Intel part's 102.4 GB/s.

The market segments are both listed as Desktop, and both have Active production status. The AMD part has no architecture field filled in, while the Intel part explicitly lists Arrow Lake. The AMD part's generation string includes the full Zen 5 (Granite Ridge) designation, and the Intel part's generation string includes the Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake) designation.

The Verdict

The recorded data offers a one-sided picture. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T has 17 benchmark scores, an average score of 38194, and an 86th percentile rank among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals sit within 0.2% of its average score, indicating that it performs in line with processors like the AMD Ryzen 7 250, Intel Core i5-14490F, Intel Core i5-13600HX, and Intel Core i5-13600KF. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has no benchmark scores, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile rank, which reflects missing data rather than measured performance.

For users selecting between these two processors, the Intel part is the only one with verified performance data. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 and single-core score of 3699, along with its PassMark multi-thread score of 30833 and single-thread score of 4367, establish a concrete performance baseline. The AMD part's specifications suggest potential advantages in multi-threaded workloads due to its 16 cores and 32 threads, and its 128 MB L3 cache could benefit cache-sensitive applications, but the database provides no measured confirmation of these advantages.

The Intel part also carries a lower TDP of 65 watts compared to the AMD part's 170 watts, which indicates a more power-efficient design. The Intel part has a higher memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s for the AMD part. The Intel part was released earlier, on January 6, 2025, and has a launch MSRP of $270. The AMD part was released later, on October 6, 2025, with no launch MSRP recorded.

The data supports choosing the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T for anyone requiring immediately verified performance, since every recorded benchmark shows strong results. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D remains an unmeasured quantity in the database, with architectural specifications that hint at high multi-thread capability but no scores to back those hints. The verdict from the data is straightforward: the Intel part has proven performance, and the AMD part requires additional benchmark data before any quantitative comparison can be made.