AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245K Comparison

The Verdict

The database comparison between the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is limited by a lack of recorded benchmark scores for the AMD part. The Intel processor has an extensive benchmark record, while the AMD chip has no entries in the database. This means direct performance conclusions cannot be drawn from measured data. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K holds a percentile rank of 91 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54053. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, which scores 54762 and is 1.3% faster, and the Intel Core i7-14700F, which scores 53620 and is 0.8% slower. The Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53701, 0.7% slower, and the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, 1.1% slower. For users prioritizing measured performance, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is the only option with data backing it. The AMD part, however, offers structural advantages in core count, cache size, and PCIe lane count, which may matter for specific workloads even without benchmark confirmation.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D belongs to the 9000 series and uses the Granite Ridge codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It houses 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The chip integrates 128 MB of L3 cache, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 per core. The transistor count is 16,630 million across a dual-die design, with each die measuring 70.6 mm². The processor uses the AMD Socket AM5 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, delivering a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, and the CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. Integrated graphics come in the form of Radeon Graphics.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2, uses the Arrow Lake-S codename, and is fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It has 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning no hyperthreading support. Base clock is 4.20 GHz, boost clock is 5.20 GHz. The L3 cache is 24 MB shared, with 192 KB of L1 per core and 3 MB of L2 per core. Transistors number 17,800 million on a 243 mm² die. The socket is Intel Socket 1851. Memory support includes DDR5 in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. Integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

The AMD chip is built on an older 4 nm node versus Intel's 3 nm, but the AMD part uses a dual-die approach with two 70.6 mm² chiplets, whereas Intel uses a single 243 mm² die. The AMD part has a larger L3 cache by 104 MB, a higher thread count by 18 threads, and four more PCIe Gen 5 lanes. Intel counters with a higher memory bandwidth, 12.8 GB/s more, and a larger L1 and L2 cache per core. Both processors have unlocked multipliers and active production status.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K demonstrates clear strengths in measured benchmarks. In Cinebench R23, it scores 25066 in multicore and 2132 in single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 15368 multicore and 2169 single-core. Cinebench R15 delivers 3850 multicore and 322 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 43047, a single-thread score of 4714, and a physics score of 3081. Data compression reaches 458817, data encryption 33286, extended instructions 37617, floating-point math 130678, integer math 98524, random string sorting 55098, and prime number finding 414.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has no benchmark scores in the database, so no measured wins can be attributed to it. However, structural specifications indicate potential advantages in heavily threaded workloads. With 16 cores and 32 threads, the AMD part doubles the thread count of the Intel chip. The 128 MB L3 cache is over five times larger than Intel's 24 MB, which could benefit workloads with large working sets. The 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide more expansion headroom than Intel's 20. The AMD chip has a higher boost clock, 5.70 GHz versus 5.20 GHz, and a higher base clock, 4.30 GHz versus 4.20 GHz. The Intel part has a lower TDP, 125 watts versus 170 watts, and a higher memory bandwidth, 102.4 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K has 14 cores and 14 threads.

Q: What is the L3 cache size difference?

A: The AMD chip has 128 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D boosts to 5.70 GHz. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K boosts to 5.20 GHz.

Q: What are the benchmark scores for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel chip scores 25066 in multicore and 2132 in single-core in Cinebench R23.

Q: Does the AMD processor have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database shows no benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Both processors support ECC memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth for each processor?

A: The AMD chip has 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip has 102.4 GB/s.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head comparison is impossible because the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has no benchmark records. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K's performance can be contextualized through its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, which shares the X3D branding and likely similar architectural traits, scores 54762 on average, which is 1.3% faster than the Intel chip. This indicates that within the same product family, the X3D variant holds a slight edge in measured average performance. The Intel Core i7-14700F scores 53620, 0.8% slower, while the Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53701, 0.7% slower, and the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, 1.1% slower.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K's average benchmark score of 54053 places it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its single-thread PassMark score of 4714 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2132 indicate strong per-core performance. Multicore results, such as the Cinebench R23 score of 25066 and PassMark multithread score of 43047, show the chip handles parallel workloads effectively despite lacking hyperthreading. The data compression score of 458817 is particularly high, suggesting strong integer throughput in data-heavy tasks.

Without AMD benchmark data, the only structural comparison available is through specifications. The AMD chip's 32 threads versus Intel's 14 threads suggests a theoretical advantage in heavily threaded scenarios, but no measured confirmation exists. The Intel chip's higher memory bandwidth, 102.4 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s, indicates faster memory access for bandwidth-sensitive applications. The Intel chip also has a lower TDP, 125 watts versus 170 watts, which may affect thermal and power characteristics in sustained workloads.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K has 14 cores and 14 threads. Base clocks are 4.30 GHz for AMD and 4.20 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 5.70 GHz for AMD and 5.20 GHz for Intel. TDP ratings are 170 watts for AMD and 125 watts for Intel. Sockets differ: AMD uses Socket AM5, Intel uses Socket 1851.

Cache layouts diverge significantly. The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 128 MB of L3. The Intel chip has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. Process nodes differ: AMD uses 4 nm, Intel uses 3 nm, both at TSMC. Transistor counts are 16,630 million for AMD and 17,800 million for Intel. Die sizes are 2x 70.6 mm² for AMD and 243 mm² for Intel.

Memory capabilities are similar in type and channel configuration, both supporting DDR5 in dual-channel mode. Bandwidth differs: AMD has 89.6 GB/s, Intel has 102.4 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. PCIe lane counts differ: AMD provides 24 Gen 5 lanes, Intel provides 20 Gen 5 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: AMD uses Radeon Graphics, Intel uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. Both have unlocked multipliers, active production status, and support desktop market segments. Release dates differ: AMD was released on 2025-10-06, Intel on 2024-10-23. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $319; the AMD part has no listed launch MSRP.