AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D vs Intel Core 7 240H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D contains no benchmark entries, while the Intel Core 7 240H has a full set of measured scores. This creates an asymmetric comparison: the Intel part can be evaluated directly against its nearest rivals, but the AMD processor's performance must be inferred from its architectural specifications and market positioning.

The Intel Core 7 240H achieves an average benchmark score of 31,483 across all recorded tests. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 3 205, posts an average score of 31,473, a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX matches at 31,495, also 0 percent delta. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H scores 31,508, which is 0.1 percent higher than the Core 7 240H, and the Intel Core i5-13500 likewise scores 31,510, a 0.1 percent advantage. These deltas indicate that the Core 7 240H sits in a tightly clustered performance band where the differences among these four rivals are negligible in real-world terms.

Looking at specific workload scores for the Core 7 240H, the Cinebench R23 multi-core test records 15,764 points, while the single-core test returns 1,719 points. The R20 multi-core result is 8,562, and the single-core result is 1,208. In R15, the multi-core score is 2,360 and the single-core score is 249. These results show a consistent scaling pattern across Cinebench versions, with the multi-core performance roughly nine times the single-core score in each iteration.

PassMark tests reveal more granular strengths. The data compression score is 271,774, which is the highest recorded figure among the PassMark tests for this processor. Integer math scores 80,396, while floating-point math reaches 58,905. Random string sorting returns 28,866, extended instructions score 16,897, and data encryption achieves 15,155. The prime number finding test records only 102, the lowest score in the set. The PassMark multithread score is 23,975, and the single-thread score is 3,782. The physics test returns 1,723.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its win count against the Intel part stands at zero. The Intel Core 7 240H also has zero recorded wins against the AMD part for the same reason. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, meaning no direct comparative tests have been logged. The percentile ranking tells a partial story: the AMD processor sits at the 50th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel processor ranks at the 82nd percentile. This percentile gap indicates that the Intel part outperforms a significantly larger share of the CPU population in the database, based on available measurements.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their underlying design. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D belongs to the 9000 series, uses the Granite Ridge codename, and is built on the Zen 5 architecture as part of the Ryzen Embedded generation. It is fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process node. The Intel Core 7 240H uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-H codename, belongs to the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, and is produced by Intel on a 10 nm process. The node difference is substantial: the AMD chip uses a more advanced lithography, which typically allows higher transistor density and improved power efficiency per unit of work.

In terms of core configuration, the AMD part offers 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel part provides 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD processor has a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The Intel processor has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The AMD part operates at a thermal design power of 170 watts, whereas the Intel part is rated at 45 watts. This power difference is expected given the socket and market positioning: the AMD chip uses AMD Socket AM5, a desktop-oriented socket, while the Intel chip uses Intel BGA 1744, a mobile-oriented socket.

Cache hierarchies differ notably. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the AMD side and 2 MB per core on the Intel side. The L3 cache presents a major divergence: the AMD processor has 128 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel processor has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part's cache structure suggests a design optimized for workloads that benefit from large on-die data retention, while the Intel part's smaller L3 cache is typical for mobile processors with lower power envelopes.

Memory support also differs. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory exclusively, with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. ECC memory support is present on the AMD processor but absent on the Intel processor. The PCIe capabilities differ as well: the AMD part provides Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part provides Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU.

Integrated graphics differ between the two. The AMD processor includes Radeon Graphics, while the Intel processor includes Iris Xe Graphics 64EU. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, meaning overclocking is possible, while the Intel part has a locked multiplier. The transistor count for the AMD processor is recorded as 16,630 million, and the die size is listed as 2x 70.6 mm². The Intel processor has no recorded transistor count or die size in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 240H delivers measurable wins across all recorded benchmarks simply because it has recorded data. Its 82nd percentile ranking relative to all CPUs indicates that it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D, with its 50th percentile ranking and no benchmark scores, cannot claim any measured wins. However, architectural specifications suggest where each part would excel based on design intent.

For multi-threaded workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computation, the AMD processor's 16 cores and 32 threads provide a structural advantage. The 128 MB of L3 cache is particularly suited for data-intensive tasks where repeated access to large datasets occurs. The higher base clock of 4.30 GHz and boost clock of 5.70 GHz, combined with the 4 nm process node, indicate strong single-thread and multi-thread potential. The 170 watt TDP reflects a design that prioritizes sustained performance over power efficiency.

For mobile and power-constrained environments, the Intel Core 7 240H holds the advantage. The 45 watt TDP makes it suitable for laptops and compact systems where thermal management is critical. The support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory provides flexibility in system design, which can be advantageous in cost-sensitive or legacy-compatible builds. The 10 cores and 16 threads are sufficient for mainstream productivity tasks, and the 82nd percentile ranking confirms that its measured performance is competitive with other high-end mobile processors.

In terms of single-thread performance, the Intel part's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,719 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,782 are solid figures. The AMD part's higher boost clock of 5.70 GHz suggests it would likely outperform the Intel part in single-threaded tests, but no data exists to confirm this. The unlocked multiplier on the AMD part also enables manual tuning, which could extend its performance advantage in controlled environments.

For workloads that rely heavily on cache, the AMD processor's 128 MB of L3 cache is a clear structural win. The Intel processor's 24 MB of shared L3 cache is comparatively modest. For workloads that require ECC memory, such as error-sensitive server or embedded applications, the AMD processor is the only option between the two, as the Intel part does not support ECC.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core 7 240H has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the benchmark percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D ranks at the 50th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core 7 240H ranks at the 82nd percentile.

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 240H support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core 7 240H does not support ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D does support ECC memory.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has 128 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core 7 240H has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D has a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core 7 240H's boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D supports DDR5 only, while the Intel Core 7 240H supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear split in intended use cases. The Intel Core 7 240H is the only processor with measured benchmark scores, and those scores place it at the 82nd percentile, with an average benchmark score of 31,483. Its nearest rivals all score within 0.1 percent, confirming that it performs in line with other high-end mobile and desktop parts from the same generation. For anyone selecting a processor for a mobile system, a compact form factor, or a power-constrained build, the Intel part's 45 watt TDP and recorded performance make it the only verified option in this comparison.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D, despite having no benchmark scores, offers structural advantages that the Intel part cannot match. Its 16 cores, 32 threads, 128 MB of L3 cache, and 5.70 GHz boost clock indicate a processor designed for heavy multi-threaded and cache-sensitive workloads. The 170 watt TDP and desktop socket suggest it belongs in a system with robust cooling and power delivery. The ECC memory support and 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes further position it for embedded or server-like applications where reliability and expansion are priorities.

The percentile gap, 50th versus 82nd, reflects the fact that the AMD part has no recorded performance data, so its percentile is based on unspecified criteria rather than measured scores. This means the percentile figures should not be read as a direct performance comparison. The architectural specifications, however, point to the AMD processor being the stronger choice for raw compute throughput, while the Intel processor is the stronger choice for verified, power-efficient performance in a mobile context. Neither part dominates the other across all dimensions; the correct selection depends entirely on the system's power budget, cooling capacity, and workload profile. The Intel part wins on measured data and efficiency, the AMD part wins on core count, cache size, and expandability.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X3D | Intel Core 7 240H |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 16 | 10 |

| Threads | 32 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 4.30 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.70 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 170 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel BGA 1744 |

| Codename | Granite Ridge | Raptor Lake-H |

| Generation | Zen 5 (Granite Ridge) | Raptor Lake Refresh |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 16,630 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 2x 70.6 mm² | Not recorded |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 128 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe Lanes | Gen 5, 24 Lanes | Gen 5, 8 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 64EU |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $502 |