AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS and Intel Core 5 213PTE do not share a single common benchmark entry in the database. The Intel part has a full Cinebench and PassMark suite recorded, while the AMD part currently has no benchmark scores listed. This makes a direct score-by-score comparison impossible from the recorded data. What can be analyzed is the Intel Core 5 213PTE's absolute performance profile and how it positions against its nearest rivals, which provides context for the AMD part's expected standing given its specifications.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21751 and a single-core score of 3070. Its Cinebench R20 multi-core result is 9135, with a single-core score of 1289, and the older R15 test shows 2192 multi-core and 309 single-core. In PassMark testing, the part scores 25590 in multithread, 3718 in single-thread, 93109 in integer math, 71722 in floating point math, 261083 in data compression, and 14413 in data encryption. These figures place the Intel part at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 32924.

Against its nearest rivals, the Intel Core 5 213PTE is essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-12700, which scores 32942, a delta of -0.1%. It edges the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H by 0.3%, with that rival scoring 32812. The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33079, putting the Intel part 0.5% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G scores 33089, also 0.5% ahead of the Intel chip. The data indicates the Intel Core 5 213PTE sits in a tight performance cluster, within half a percent of several established mid-range and upper-mid-range desktop and mobile processors.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the AMD part, so its measured performance is unavailable. All comparative statements must rely on the Intel part's scores and the specification differences.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 213PTE compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D?

A: The Intel part scores 32924 on average, which is 0.5% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 33079. This places the two parts within a negligible margin of each other in overall benchmark performance.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core 5 213PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but with a lower recorded bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. Intel leads by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS and the Intel Core 5 213PTE have ECC memory support enabled in their specifications.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD part uses a denser manufacturing node.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core 5 213PTE?

A: The launch MSRP is $221. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS has no launch MSRP listed in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design lineages. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, part of the Ryzen Embedded 8000 series. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. No transistor count or die size data is recorded for the Intel part.

Cache layouts differ substantially. The AMD part allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part allocates 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel's larger per-core L1 and L2 allocations and its larger L3 pool give it a structural advantage in cache capacity, which can benefit workloads with repeated data access patterns.

The integrated graphics differ as well. AMD uses the Radeon 760M, while Intel uses the UHD Graphics 730. No benchmark scores are recorded for either iGPU, so a performance comparison cannot be made from the data. Both parts are locked, with multiplier unlocking disabled.

The AMD part is classified in the database as a mobile market segment product, despite its "Embedded" branding, and uses AMD Socket FP8. The Intel part is classified as a desktop market segment product and uses Intel Socket 1700. This socket and segment distinction matters for platform planning: the AMD part targets compact or embedded mobile-style systems, while the Intel part fits standard LGA1700 desktop boards.

Specification Differences

The most direct specification comparison shows clear divergences:

• Cores: AMD has 6, Intel has 8.
• Threads: AMD has 12, Intel has 16.
• Base clock: AMD runs at 4.30 GHz, Intel at 2.10 GHz.
• Boost clock: AMD reaches 5.00 GHz, Intel reaches 5.20 GHz.
• Process node: AMD uses 4 nm, Intel uses 10 nm.
• Foundry: AMD uses TSMC, Intel uses its own fabs.
• L1 cache per core: AMD has 64 KB, Intel has 80 KB.
• L2 cache per core: AMD has 1 MB, Intel has 2 MB.
• L3 cache shared: AMD has 16 MB, Intel has 24 MB.
• Memory support: AMD supports DDR5 only, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5.
• Memory bandwidth: AMD records 89.6 GB/s, Intel records 76.8 GB/s.
• PCIe: AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).
• Integrated graphics: AMD uses Radeon 760M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 730.
• Socket: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, Intel uses Intel Socket 1700.
• Market segment: AMD is listed as Mobile, Intel as Desktop.
• Release date: AMD released 2024-04-01, Intel released 2026-03-08.
• Transistors: AMD has 25,000 million, Intel has none listed.
• Die size: AMD is 178 mm², Intel has none listed.
• Part number: AMD is unknown, Intel is SA4QM.
• Launch MSRP: AMD has none listed, Intel is $221.

Both parts share a 45 W TDP, dual-channel memory bus, ECC support, and locked multipliers. The AMD part's higher base clock and faster memory bandwidth contrast with Intel's higher boost clock, larger cache, and PCIe Gen 5 support.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins on core count, thread count, boost clock, cache capacity at every level, PCIe generation, and memory flexibility with DDR4 and DDR5 support. Its recorded benchmark scores show it operating at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average score of 32924. This makes it a strong candidate for multi-threaded desktop workloads where the 8-core, 16-thread configuration and 24 MB L3 cache can be fully utilized. The data compression score of 261083 and integer math score of 93109 indicate solid throughput in data-heavy and computational tasks.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS wins on process node, base clock, memory bandwidth, and transistor density. Its 4 nm process and 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die represent a more modern manufacturing approach. The 4.30 GHz base clock is substantially higher than Intel's 2.10 GHz, which can benefit lightly threaded tasks that stay near base frequency. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth exceeds Intel's 76.8 GB/s, giving AMD an edge in memory-bound operations. The Radeon 760M integrated graphics are also a differentiator, though no iGPU benchmarks exist in the data.

The AMD part's lack of recorded benchmark scores means its wins are purely speculative based on specifications. The Intel part has measurable wins in every recorded benchmark category, but those are only measurable for Intel. For workloads that rely on single-thread frequency, Intel's 5.20 GHz boost clock is the highest recorded figure between the two, though AMD's 5.00 GHz boost is close. For workloads that rely on sustained multi-core throughput, Intel's extra 2 cores and 4 threads provide a structural advantage.

The Verdict

The data supports the Intel Core 5 213PTE as the more thoroughly measured and higher-performing part in the database. Its 83rd percentile ranking, average score of 32924, and near-tie with established processors like the Intel Core i7-12700, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G place it in a competitive performance tier. The Intel part has a clear edge in core count, cache, and PCIe generation, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, which broadens platform compatibility.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS cannot be evaluated on measured performance because the database contains no benchmark scores for it. Its specifications indicate a modern 4 nm design with higher base clock and memory bandwidth, but without recorded data, any performance claim would be unsubstantiated. The AMD part is also classified as mobile, suggesting its intended use case is compact embedded or laptop-style systems, while the Intel part targets desktop platforms.

For a builder selecting between these two, the Intel Core 5 213PTE offers verified performance with a full benchmark suite, a launch MSRP of $221, and a desktop socket that fits standard LGA1700 boards. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS offers a newer process node and faster memory bandwidth on paper, but no measured results exist to confirm its real-world behavior. The database's recorded data favors the Intel part for anyone who wants proven multi-threaded performance in a desktop context. The AMD part remains an unverified specification sheet entry, and the Intel part is the only one of the two with measurable evidence of its capabilities.