AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 compare to the Intel Core 3 201TE in terms of thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads. This gives the AMD processor twice the core and thread count of the Intel part.

Q: What is the performance percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the Intel Core 3 201TE is in the 50th percentile. This indicates the AMD part is positioned considerably higher in overall performance distribution.

Q: What integrated graphics do these processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 uses the Radeon 8060S integrated graphics, while the Intel Core 3 201TE uses UHD Graphics 730. Both are integrated solutions, but the AMD implementation is designed for higher graphics throughput.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 supports LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 3 201TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What process nodes are used for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core 3 201TE uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD processor also has a smaller die size of 2x 70.6 mm² compared to the Intel processor's 163 mm².

Q: What is the release date and market segment for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 was released on 2026-01-05 and targets the mobile market segment. The Intel Core 3 201TE was released on 2025-01-12 and targets the desktop market segment. Both are currently listed as active production parts.

Where Each One Wins

The data shows a clear division of strengths between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 dominates in multi-threaded workloads, as expected from its 8-core, 16-thread configuration. The recorded benchmark scores for the AMD part include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18759 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 33486. These figures place it far above what the Intel Core 3 201TE would be expected to achieve given its 4-core, 8-thread design, though no direct benchmark data exists for the Intel part in the database.

The Intel Core 3 201TE wins in the desktop segment positioning. It uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is a standard desktop platform, and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 uses AMD Socket FP11 and targets mobile devices. For desktop-oriented workloads that rely on established memory ecosystems, the Intel part offers dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 support.

The AMD processor wins in memory bandwidth. Its quad-channel LPDDR5X configuration delivers 256.0 GB/s, compared to the Intel processor's dual-channel 76.8 GB/s. This gives the AMD part a 3.3x bandwidth advantage, which benefits memory-intensive applications such as data compression and encryption workloads. The PassMark data compression score for AMD is 400887, and the data encryption score is 20092.

The Intel Core 3 201TE wins on PCIe generation. It supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. For systems using Gen 5 storage or expansion cards, the Intel platform provides a newer interconnect standard.

The AMD processor wins on clock speeds. Its base clock is 3.60 GHz and boost clock is 5.00 GHz, compared to the Intel processor's 2.90 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost. This translates to higher single-thread performance potential, reflected in the AMD Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1960 and PassMark single-thread score of 4185.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the Strix Halo codename, while the Intel Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename without a publicly listed architecture name in the database. The AMD generation is listed as "Ryzen AI Max (Zen 5 (Strix Halo))", and the Intel generation is listed as "Core 3 (Bartlett Lake)".

The process technology differs significantly. AMD uses a 4 nm node from TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm node from its own foundry. The die size also differs: AMD uses two chiplets at 2x 70.6 mm², while Intel uses a monolithic 163 mm² die.

Cache hierarchy shows structural differences. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache differs: AMD has 1 MB per core, while Intel has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is substantially different: AMD has 32 MB shared, while Intel has 12 MB shared. This gives AMD a 20 MB advantage in shared L3 cache.

The memory architecture is fundamentally different. AMD uses quad-channel LPDDR5X memory, while Intel uses dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5. The memory bandwidth figures reflect this: 256.0 GB/s for AMD versus 76.8 GB/s for Intel. Both processors support ECC memory.

The integrated graphics differ in naming and likely capability. AMD uses Radeon 8060S, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part is a mobile processor with integrated graphics designed for a laptop form factor, while the Intel part is a desktop processor with integrated graphics for standard desktop use.

The PCIe implementation differs by generation. AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Both are listed as CPU-only lane counts.

The socket types are incompatible. AMD uses AMD Socket FP11, while Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. This means the two processors cannot be used in the same motherboard platform.

Specification Differences

The core count differs: AMD has 8 cores, Intel has 4 cores. Thread count differs: AMD has 16 threads, Intel has 8 threads.

Base clock speeds differ: AMD runs at 3.60 GHz, Intel at 2.90 GHz. Boost clock speeds differ: AMD reaches 5.00 GHz, Intel reaches 4.60 GHz.

TDP differs: AMD is rated at 55 W, Intel at 45 W. This indicates the AMD part draws more power under load, which is consistent with its higher core count and clock speeds.

Socket types differ: AMD uses AMD Socket FP11, Intel uses Intel Socket 1700.

Process node differs: AMD uses 4 nm, Intel uses 10 nm. Foundry differs: AMD uses TSMC, Intel uses its own foundry.

Die size differs: AMD uses 2x 70.6 mm², Intel uses 163 mm².

L2 cache per core differs: AMD has 1 MB, Intel has 1.25 MB. L3 cache differs: AMD has 32 MB shared, Intel has 12 MB shared.

Memory support differs: AMD supports LPDDR5X, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bus differs: AMD uses quad-channel, Intel uses dual-channel. Memory bandwidth differs: AMD has 256.0 GB/s, Intel has 76.8 GB/s.

PCIe generation differs: AMD uses Gen 4, Intel uses Gen 5. Both have 16 lanes.

Integrated graphics differ: AMD uses Radeon 8060S, Intel uses UHD Graphics 730.

Market segment differs: AMD targets mobile, Intel targets desktop.

Release dates differ: AMD released on 2026-01-05, Intel released on 2025-01-12.

The AMD processor has a part number of 100-000001980, while the Intel processor has a part number of SRPKDQ5CK. The Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $134. The AMD processor has no launch MSRP listed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and the Intel Core 3 201TE. The Intel Core 3 201TE has no benchmark scores recorded in the database, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the wins counters for both processors are 0.

However, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has a substantial set of recorded benchmark scores. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 18759, and its single-core score is 1960. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 2872, and the single-core score is 298.

The PassMark suite shows the AMD processor's strengths. Its multi-thread score is 33486, and its single-thread score is 4185. The integer math score is 109588, and the floating-point math score is 72722. The data compression score is 400887, and the data encryption score is 20092. The extended instructions score is 32719, and the find prime numbers score is 145. The random string sorting score is 43196, and the physics score is 1843.

The AMD processor's average benchmark score is 49796. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core 9 273PE with an average score of 49845 and a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Core i5-14600KF with an average score of 49394 and a delta of 0.8%, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 with an average score of 49228 and a delta of 1.2%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G with an average score of 49196 and a delta of 1.2%.

The percentile ranking of the AMD processor is 90, meaning it outperforms 90% of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core 3 201TE has a percentile ranking of 50, placing it at the median. Since the Intel part has no benchmark scores recorded, its performance must be inferred from its specifications: 4 cores, 8 threads, 2.90 GHz base clock, and 4.60 GHz boost clock.

Given the significant core count advantage and higher clock speeds, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 would be expected to outperform the Intel Core 3 201TE in multi-threaded workloads by a substantial margin. The AMD processor's 16 threads versus 8 threads, combined with its 32 MB L3 cache versus 12 MB, indicate a clear performance advantage in parallel processing tasks.

The memory bandwidth difference also favors AMD. The 256.0 GB/s quad-channel LPDDR5X configuration versus the 76.8 GB/s dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 configuration means AMD has more than three times the memory bandwidth available. This affects workloads that are memory-bound, such as large data processing or compression tasks.

The Intel Core 3 201TE does have advantages in certain areas. Its PCIe Gen 5 support is newer than AMD's Gen 4, and its 45 W TDP is lower than AMD's 55 W TDP. The desktop socket and DDR4 compatibility may make it easier to integrate into existing desktop systems. The launch MSRP of $134 provides a cost reference point, though the AMD part has no listed launch MSRP.

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is positioned as a high-performance mobile processor, while the Intel Core 3 201TE is a mid-range desktop processor. The performance gap in multi-threaded workloads is expected to be large based on core count, clock speed, cache size, and memory bandwidth differences. The Intel processor's advantage lies in platform compatibility and newer PCIe generation, while the AMD processor leads in raw computational throughput.