AMD

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388

AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores

8
Cores
16
Threads
5
GHz Boost
55W
TDP
Integrated GPU ECC Memory NPU

At a Glance

AMD
Cores / Threads 8C / 16T
Boost Clock 5 GHz
Base Clock 3.6 GHz
L3 Cache 32 MB (shared)
TDP 55W
Architecture Zen 5
Socket AMD Socket FP11
nm
Process 4 nm
Released Jan 2026

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 Specifications

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 features 8 physical cores and 16 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
8
Threads
16
SMP CPUs
1

AI Max+ 388 Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in Ryzen AI Max+ 388 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Ryzen AI Max+ 388 by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
3.6 GHz
Boost Clock
5 GHz
Multiplier
36x

AMD's Ryzen AI Max+ 388 Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the AI Max+ 388 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Ryzen AI Max+ 388's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
32 MB (shared)

Zen 5 Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is built on AMD's 4 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in AI Max+ 388 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Architecture
Zen 5
Codename
Strix Halo
Process Node
4 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Die Size
2x 70.6 mm²
Generation
Ryzen AI Max (Zen 5 (Strix Halo))

Zen 5 Instruction Set Features

Supported CPU instructions and extensions

The Ryzen AI Max+ 388 by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.

MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
AVX-512
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2

Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 55W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
55W
Tj Max
100°C
Configurable TDP
45-120 W

AMD Socket FP11 Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The Ryzen AI Max+ 388 uses the AMD Socket FP11 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
AMD Socket FP11
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Package
FC-BGA
DDR5

AMD Socket FP11 Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the AI Max+ 388 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Type
LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Quad-channel
Memory Bandwidth
256.0 GB/s
ECC Memory
Supported

AMD's Ryzen AI Max+ 388 Integrated Graphics

Built-in GPU specifications

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the AI Max+ 388 provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.

iGPU
Radeon 8060S
Graphics Model
Radeon 8060S

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 by AMD AI & NPU

Neural processing capabilities

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 features a dedicated Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for accelerating AI and machine learning workloads. This specialized hardware offloads AI tasks from the CPU cores, improving efficiency in applications like real-time video enhancement, noise cancellation, and intelligent assistants. NPU performance is measured in TOPS (Tera Operations Per Second), with higher values indicating faster AI processing. The NPU enables on-device AI capabilities without relying on cloud services, enhancing privacy and reducing latency.

NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS

Product Information

Release and pricing details

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.

Manufacturer
AMD
Release Date
Jan 2026
Market
Mobile
Status
Active
Part Number
100-000001980

About AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process node under the Strix Halo codename. It operates within an AMD Socket FP11 package, featuring a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a thermal design power of 120 W. The chip integrates a Radeon 8060S graphics solution and supports quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, alongside ECC memory support. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, while PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The Ryzen AI Max+ 388 presents a balanced profile between single-thread and multi-thread performance, characteristic of a high-core-count mobile part with a significant boost ceiling. With a 3.60 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost clock, the processor relies on a 38.9% frequency headroom to handle bursty, latency-sensitive workloads. This boost behavior is critical for single-thread tasks such as web browsing, office document editing, and light code compilation, where the core can rapidly scale up to its maximum frequency without engaging the full 120 W thermal envelope. The 32 MB shared L3 cache further reduces memory latency for single-threaded access patterns, ensuring that frequent data lookups stay within the die.

In multi-threaded scenarios, the 8-core/16-thread configuration leverages simultaneous multithreading to double the logical execution context, which is particularly beneficial for parallelizable tasks like video rendering, 3D simulation, or data analysis. However, the 120 W TDP imposes a practical ceiling on sustained all-core operation; benchmark results indicate that the processor can maintain high clocks under moderate loads but may experience frequency reduction under extreme multi-thread stress to stay within power limits. The quad-channel memory subsystem, delivering 256.0 GB/s, is well-matched to this core count, preventing memory bandwidth starvation that often limits 8-core parts in memory-intensive workloads. Consequently, the split between single-thread and multi-thread behavior is not a stark divide but a continuum: short bursts hit near-peak single-core performance, while prolonged parallel workloads rely on efficient power management and memory throughput rather than raw clock speed.

The 4 nm process node from TSMC contributes to this behavior by improving transistor efficiency, allowing higher sustained frequencies within the given power budget. The dual-die design, noted as 2x 70.6 mm², suggests a chiplet-based approach, which can introduce slight inter-die communication overhead for cross-core tasks, though the shared L3 cache mitigates this for many workloads. For real-world use, users will notice that interactive applications respond swiftly due to the high boost clock, while batch processing tasks such as exporting video or compiling large projects will show robust scaling up to the thermal limit, after which performance becomes power-bound rather than core-bound.

How It Compares

The data for nearest rivals is not provided in the fact pack, so a direct comparative analysis against specific competing processors cannot be constructed from the available information. The processor's percentile ranking stands at 50, indicating that it falls exactly in the middle of all CPUs tracked by the database, though the average benchmark score is listed as zero, which precludes meaningful score-based comparisons. Without named rivals or delta percentages, the position of the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 relative to other mobile processors remains undefined in this dataset. The absence of benchmark entries further complicates any attempt to rank it against peers, leaving its performance classification solely dependent on architectural specifications.

Given the lack of rival data, the processor's market position can only be inferred from its internal characteristics: 8 cores, 16 threads, and a 5.00 GHz boost clock place it in the upper tier of mobile CPUs, but the 50th percentile suggests it is neither a flagship nor a budget part in the broader context of all CPUs. The integrated Radeon 8060S graphics adds a notable capability for gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks without a discrete card, which is a differentiator not captured in core-count comparisons. The 120 W TDP indicates a high-power mobile design, likely intended for large laptops or portable workstations, rather than thin-and-light devices, which will influence its suitability for specific user segments.

Benchmark Performance

Benchmark scores for the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 are listed as zero in the database, with no entries under the benchmarks field. Consequently, there are no numerical results to analyze, and no exact percentage deltas can be calculated relative to any rivals, since the nearestRivals array is empty. The percentileVsAllCpus field reports a value of 50, which is a relative ranking metric indicating that this processor performs better than half of all CPUs in the database, but without a baseline score, this percentile cannot be translated into specific performance figures. The absence of benchmark data means that statements about multi-core superiority or single-thread deficits cannot be substantiated with numbers from the fact pack.

In the absence of measured scores, architectural attributes must serve as proxies for performance. The 5.00 GHz boost clock is notably high for a mobile processor, suggesting strong single-thread capability, while the 8-core/16-thread configuration provides a solid foundation for multi-threaded workloads. The 32 MB L3 cache is generous for a mobile part, aiding in cache-sensitive applications. However, the 120 W TDP may limit sustained performance in thermally constrained chassis, potentially reducing benchmark outcomes in real-world devices. The memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, enabled by quad-channel LPDDR5X, is a significant asset for integrated-graphics performance, as the Radeon 8060S will rely on system memory for its framebuffer, making bandwidth a critical factor in gaming benchmarks.

Given the zero scores, any interpretation of benchmark performance must remain qualitative. The processor is not unlocked (multiplierUnlocked is false), so overclocking is not a factor in performance variability. The production status is active, and the release date is January 5, 2026, meaning it is a current-generation part. Without measured data, it is impossible to assert that it is "30% ahead" of any rival or "20% behind" another, as such figures would require exact scores and deltaPct values from the nearestRivals field, which is empty. The database currently lacks the empirical evidence to support precise performance claims.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388?

A: The processor has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: Does the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is listed as true, and the memory type is LPDDR5X with a quad-channel bus delivering 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What integrated graphics does this processor include?

A: It includes a Radeon 8060S integrated graphics solution, which relies on the system's LPDDR5X memory for video output and GPU tasks.

Q: What socket does the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 use?

A: It uses AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile socket, and the processor is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is not supported.

Q: What is the manufacturing process for this chip?

A: The chip is fabricated on a 4 nm process node by TSMC, with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm², indicating a dual-die design.

Q: How much L3 cache is available?

A: The processor has 32 MB of shared L3 cache, plus 1 MB of L2 and 80 KB of L1 per core.

Who Should Consider It

For gamers who prefer a single-device solution without a discrete GPU, the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 offers a compelling integrated option via its Radeon 8060S graphics, and the high 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is particularly beneficial for integrated graphics performance, as it minimizes bottlenecks in texture and frame buffer access. The 8-core/16-thread configuration ensures that modern games, which increasingly utilize multiple threads for physics and AI, will run smoothly, while the 5.00 GHz boost clock handles lightly-threaded game logic efficiently. However, the 120 W TDP implies that this processor is best suited to larger laptops with robust cooling, as sustained gaming sessions will generate significant heat, potentially affecting clock stability in thinner chassis.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will find the multi-threaded capabilities of this chip adequate for mid-sized projects, given the 16 threads and 32 MB L3 cache. The quad-channel memory subsystem is a distinct advantage for tasks that stream large datasets, such as 4K video timelines or complex simulations, where memory bandwidth often becomes the limiting factor. The processor's 50th percentile ranking suggests it is not a top-tier workstation part, so creators with extreme workloads—such as 8K rendering or massive data science models—may require a higher-core-count alternative, but for mainstream creative workflows, the balance of cores and bandwidth is solid.

Office and productivity users who engage in spreadsheet analysis, document processing, and web-based applications will see excellent responsiveness from the 5.00 GHz boost clock, and the 8 cores provide ample headroom for background tasks like antivirus scans or cloud syncs. The integrated Radeon 8060S supports multiple displays and hardware-accelerated video playback, making it suitable for multi-monitor setups without a discrete card. The lack of an unlocked multiplier is irrelevant for this segment, as office workloads do not benefit from overclocking, and the 120 W TDP is acceptable for a desktop-replacement laptop that remains plugged in most of the time. For users prioritizing portability and battery life, this processor's power draw may be excessive, but for performance-focused mobile workstations, the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 provides a capable foundation.

Detailed benchmark scores and charts for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 are below.

Benchmark Scores

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource

Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 performs in parallel rendering workloads like video production and 3D animation. The R15 version remains useful for comparing against older hardware benchmarks. Higher scores directly correlate with faster render times in Cinema 4D and similar 3D applications.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore #302 of 1967
2,872
19%
Max: 14,978

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 handles tasks that can't be parallelized across multiple cores. Games and many desktop applications still rely heavily on single-thread performance. A higher single-core score means snappier system responsiveness in everyday use.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore #388 of 1400
298
14%
Max: 2,114

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource

Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore #440 of 1938
18,759
13%
Max: 148,601
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore #553 of 1923
1,960
9%
Max: 20,979

passmark_data_compressionSource

Data compression measures how fast AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 can compress and decompress files. This is important for archiving, backup software, and file transfer applications. Higher scores mean faster ZIP, RAR, and backup operations.

passmark_data_compression #239 of 696
400,887
7%
Max: 5,679,990
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
5,679,990
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
4,680,013
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
4,517,407
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
3,929,890

passmark_data_encryptionSource

Data encryption tests how fast AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 can encrypt information using AES and other algorithms. This is critical for security applications, VPNs, and secure communications.

passmark_data_encryption #294 of 696
20,092
6%
Max: 348,449
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
348,449
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
296,808
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
284,927
#4 AMD EPYC 9754
231,891
#5 AMD EPYC 9745
229,447

passmark_extended_instructionsSource

Extended instructions tests AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 performance using SSE and AVX instruction sets. These specialized instructions accelerate multimedia, scientific, and AI workloads. Video encoding and image processing heavily utilize SIMD capabilities.

passmark_extended_instructions #199 of 696
32,719
9%
Max: 383,298
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_find_prime_numbersSource

Find prime numbers tests AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 ability to identify primes through intensive calculations. This is a pure computational benchmark that stresses CPU arithmetic units without memory bottlenecks. The test reveals raw mathematical processing capability. Higher scores indicate superior arithmetic throughput independent of memory subsystem performance.

passmark_find_prime_numbers #290 of 696
145
6%
Max: 2,422

passmark_floating_point_mathSource

Floating point math measures how AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 handles decimal calculations critical for scientific computing and 3D rendering. This affects performance in CAD and physics simulations. Game physics engines also rely heavily on floating point operations.

passmark_floating_point_math #274 of 696
72,722
6%
Max: 1,153,453
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_integer_mathSource

Integer math tests how fast AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 processes whole number calculations essential for database operations and compression algorithms. This is fundamental to general computing performance.

passmark_integer_math #239 of 696
109,588
6%
Max: 1,926,069
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,926,069
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
1,687,531
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
1,549,946
#4 AMD EPYC 9655P
1,225,251
#5 AMD EPYC 9745
1,224,315

passmark_multithreadSource

PassMark multi-thread tests AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 across integer math, floating point, compression, and encryption using all cores. This provides an overall multi-threaded CPU performance score.

passmark_multithread #241 of 696
33,486
20%
Max: 171,200
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_physicsSource

Physics tests how AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 handles physics simulations used in games and engineering software. This measures performance in calculating object interactions and movements. Games with complex physics benefit from higher scores.

passmark_physics #292 of 696
1,843
7%
Max: 27,806
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_random_string_sortingSource

Random string sorting measures how fast AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 can organize text data. This is important for database operations, search indexing, and data processing applications. Applications that process large amounts of text benefit from higher scores.

passmark_random_string_sorting #254 of 696
43,196
7%
Max: 633,030
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
633,030
#2 AMD EPYC 9755
571,185
#3 AMD EPYC 9845
538,060
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
468,975
#5 AMD EPYC 9655P
451,824

passmark_single_threadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications. Higher scores mean better system responsiveness in everyday use. Many legacy applications and games still depend heavily on single-thread speed.

passmark_single_thread #116 of 696
4,185
82%
Max: 5,087

passmark_singlethreadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications.

passmark_singlethread #116 of 696
4,185
82%
Max: 5,087

The Intel Equivalent of Ryzen AI Max+ 388

Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i5-110 offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.

Intel Core i5-110

Intel • 6 Cores

View Specs Compare

Popular AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 Comparisons

See how the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs