AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 vs Intel Processor U302L Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 and the Intel Processor U302L occupy very different positions in the database. The AMD part holds a 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile. The recorded data shows a substantial performance gap between the two, driven primarily by core count, thread count, and clock behavior.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 delivers 10 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Processor U302L provides 5 cores and 6 threads, with a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 2.40 GHz. In single-threaded workload terms, the AMD processor records a PassMark single-thread score of 4168. The Intel part has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so direct head-to-head comparisons rely on the AMD processor’s absolute results and its relative standing against other CPUs in the same performance tier.

Looking at the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465’s benchmark suite, the multithread score reaches 31485. This figure reflects the combined output of 20 threads across the Zen 5 architecture. The integer math score is 107173, while floating-point math registers 66824. The extended instructions score is 26441, and data compression reaches 385174. Data encryption scores 19308. Random string sorting yields 40860. Physics simulation scores 1747, and the find prime numbers test returns 126.

The average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is 62498. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX with an average score of 62738, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 62839, 0.5% higher. The Intel Core i7-13790F scores 63080, 0.9% higher. The Intel Core i9-13900KF scores 61841, which is 1.1% lower than the Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465. These delta percentages indicate that the AMD processor sits within a narrow band of high-end desktop and mobile parts, slightly below three of them and slightly above one.

Because the Intel Processor U302L has no benchmark entries in the database, the head-to-head comparison is one-sided. The database records zero wins for the Intel part and zero wins for the AMD part in direct comparisons, since no paired benchmark results exist. However, the percentile difference tells the story: the AMD part ranks in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel part ranks in the 50th percentile. This places the AMD processor well above the median CPU, while the Intel processor sits exactly at the median.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465’s single-thread score of 4168 is notable for a mobile processor with a 28 W TDP. The boost clock of 5.00 GHz contributes directly to this result. The Intel Processor U302L, with a boost clock of 2.40 GHz and a 15 W TDP, would theoretically produce a much lower single-thread score, but no measurement exists in the database to confirm this.

For multi-threaded workloads, the AMD processor’s 20 threads versus the Intel part’s 6 threads creates a 3.33x thread-count advantage. The multithread score of 31485 for the AMD part reflects this wide thread disparity. The Intel part’s absence from the benchmarks means the database cannot quantify how the 6 threads perform in practice.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 wins in every measurable category in the database. Its strengths appear across the entire PassMark suite: integer math, floating-point math, extended instructions, data compression, data encryption, random string sorting, physics, prime number finding, single-thread, and multithread. The processor’s 10 cores and 20 threads make it suitable for heavily parallel workloads. The 5.00 GHz boost clock gives it a strong single-thread presence, evidenced by the 4168 single-thread score.

The Intel Processor U302L wins in the categories that the database cannot measure for it. With no benchmark scores recorded, the database shows no wins for the Intel part. However, the Intel part’s specifications suggest its intended role differs from the AMD processor. The Intel Processor U302L uses a 15 W TDP, which is 13 W lower than the AMD part’s 28 W TDP. The Intel part also supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD part supports only DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel part’s L2 cache is larger per core at 1.25 MB per core, compared to the AMD part’s 1 MB per core. The Intel part’s L3 cache is 10 MB shared, compared to the AMD part’s 16 MB.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel Processor U302L uses a 10 nm process node from Intel. The AMD part’s socket is AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part’s integrated graphics is the Radeon 890M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 80EU. The AMD part supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only).

The AMD part’s release date is 2026-01-04, while the Intel part’s release date is 2024-04-07. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $285, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. The AMD part’s part number is 100-000001862, and the Intel part’s part number is SRPKGQ5CX.

For users prioritizing raw compute throughput, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is the clear choice based on recorded data. For users prioritizing lower power draw, the Intel Processor U302L’s 15 W TDP offers a lower power envelope, though the database does not include any efficiency benchmarks to quantify this advantage.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has an average benchmark score of 62498. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX scores 62738, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 62839, 0.5% higher. The Intel Core i7-13790F scores 63080, 0.9% higher. The Intel Core i9-13900KF scores 61841, 1.1% lower.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 ranks in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Processor U302L ranks in the 50th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Processor U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Processor U302L has a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 2.40 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel Processor U302L have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel Processor U302L has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed. All benchmark data in this analysis comes from the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has a TDP of 28 W. The Intel Processor U302L has a TDP of 15 W.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 and Intel Processor U302L differ across nearly every specification field in the database. The core count differs: 10 cores for the AMD part versus 5 cores for the Intel part. The thread count differs: 20 threads for the AMD part versus 6 threads for the Intel part. The base clock differs: 2.00 GHz for the AMD part versus 1.20 GHz for the Intel part. The boost clock differs: 5.00 GHz for the AMD part versus 2.40 GHz for the Intel part.

The TDP differs: 28 W for the AMD part versus 15 W for the Intel part. The socket differs: AMD Socket FP8 for the AMD part versus Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel part. The architecture differs: Zen 5 for the AMD part versus Raptor Lake for the Intel part. The codename differs: Gorgon Point for the AMD part versus Raptor Lake-PS for the Intel part.

The generation differs: Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) for the AMD part versus Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) for the Intel part. The process node differs: 4 nm for the AMD part versus 10 nm for the Intel part. The foundry differs: TSMC for the AMD part versus Intel for the Intel part. The die size differs: 233 mm² for the AMD part, with no recorded die size for the Intel part.

The L2 cache differs: 1 MB per core for the AMD part versus 1.25 MB per core for the Intel part. The L3 cache differs: 16 MB for the AMD part versus 10 MB shared for the Intel part. The L1 cache is the same at 80 KB per core for both.

Memory support differs: the AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. The memory bus is dual-channel for both. Memory bandwidth is recorded only for the AMD part at 89.6 GB/s; the Intel part has no recorded memory bandwidth. ECC memory support is false for both.

PCIe support differs: the AMD part has Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part has Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses Radeon 890M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 80EU. The market segment is Mobile for both. Production status is Active for both.

Release dates differ: 2026-01-04 for the AMD part versus 2024-04-07 for the Intel part. Launch MSRP is recorded only for the Intel part at $285; the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. Multiplier unlocked is false for both. Part numbers differ: 100-000001862 for the AMD part versus SRPKGQ5CX for the Intel part.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Gorgon Point. The Intel Processor U302L is built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-PS. The AMD part uses a 4 nm process node manufactured by TSMC. The Intel part uses a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel.

The AMD part’s generation is listed as “Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c),” indicating a hybrid core arrangement that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores within the same package. The Intel part’s generation is listed as “Intel Processor (Raptor Lake),” indicating a traditional Raptor Lake design without a hybrid core notation in the database.

The cache hierarchy differs between the two. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 10 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part’s larger L3 cache provides more shared memory for its 10 cores. The Intel part’s larger per-core L2 cache provides more dedicated memory for each of its 5 cores.

The die size is recorded only for the AMD part at 233 mm². The Intel part has no recorded die size. The AMD part’s die size reflects its 10-core Zen 5 configuration with integrated Radeon 890M graphics. The Intel part’s die size is not available in the database, so no comparison can be made on that front.

The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth is recorded. This means the Intel part can use older DDR4 memory, while the AMD part is restricted to newer DDR5 and LPDDR5X modules.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). This gives the AMD part twice the CPU-attached PCIe lane count, which can affect expandability for discrete GPUs or NVMe storage.

Integrated graphics differ in naming: the AMD part uses Radeon 890M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 80EU. The database does not include graphics benchmark scores for either part, so the performance difference between these integrated solutions cannot be quantified.

The AMD part has a TDP of 28 W, while the Intel part has a TDP of 15 W. The AMD part’s higher TDP allows for higher sustained clock speeds, as reflected in its 5.00 GHz boost clock versus the Intel part’s 2.40 GHz boost clock. The Intel part’s lower TDP suggests a focus on power efficiency, though the database does not include any power efficiency metrics.

The release timeline shows the Intel part launched on 2024-04-07, while the AMD part launched on 2026-01-04. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $285, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. Both parts are in Active production status and target the Mobile market segment. Neither part has an unlocked multiplier.

The AMD part’s average benchmark score of 62498 places it among high-end CPUs, as indicated by its 93rd percentile ranking. The Intel part’s average benchmark score is 0 due to missing benchmark data, and its 50th percentile ranking places it at the median of all CPUs. The architecture differences described here explain why the AMD part achieves its performance tier: more cores, more threads, higher clocks, larger L3 cache, newer process node, and higher TDP.